Dear [ ]
Yesterday I started reading two books – Pale Rider : The Spanish Flu of 1918 and How it Changed the World (Laura Spinney) and The Plague (Albert Camus). I started watching videos late into the night – drones over deserted Wuhan, microscopic exposure plates of COVID-19, a solar corona in eclipse… bats…how bats immune systems are so powerful they don’t suffer from the phlegm drowning humans do. Conspiracies of the plague, locusts in east Africa, biowarfare, strange closures of labs, U..S. China… SARS 2004… poor practice this is how a disease works, we live in a systemic world, who would have guessed the next global financial crisis would come from a bat in Wuhan… then again habitat loss has been linked to increases in virus secretion in some forms of bat. Does it all connect? What would Slothrop the war paranoiac say?
I found the YouTube channel of Dr. John Campbell, and started watching, 26 January, it opens with John top right, a camera peering down on an electron micrograph of a coronavirus, John with red pen begins to circle the edge of one. According to Dennis Gabor, the British-Hungarian inventor of holography, Leo Szilard tried in 1928 to convince him to build an electron microscope. I remember the name Szilard, like blizzard, from Spinney page 8, November 1918: r 1918:
“Strangely, the flu saved at least one life that autumn–that of a young Hungarian physicist named Leo Szilard. He fell sick while training with his regiment at Kufstein in Austria, and was granted leave to return home to Budapest. There he was wheeled into a hospital ward that ‘resembled a laundry’, with wet sheets draped between the beds.13 This humidity cure is unlikely to have contributed to his eventual recovery, but he was still in the hospital when he received a letter from his captain, informing him that the rest of his regiment had been killed at the Battle of Vittorio Veneto, on the Italian front. Szilard later moved to America and worked on the problem of nuclear fission. He would become known as one of the men behind the atom bomb. On 9 November, the kaiser abdicated. On the 11th, the armistice was signed and celebrations broke out across the world, creating close to ideal conditions for a crowd disease. Thousands poured into the streets of Lima, Peru, triggering an explosion of flu in the days that followed. An armistice ball organised by the Red Cross in Nairobi had a similar effect in Kenya, while in London, the poet Ezra Pound wandered through the rainy streets ‘to observe the effect of armistice on the populace’ and came down with what he thought, at first, was a cold.
The name coronavirus is derived from the Latin corona, meaning “crown” or “halo”, which refers to the characteristic appearance reminiscent of a crown or a solar corona around the virions (virus particles) when viewed under two-dimensional transmission electron microscopy, due to the surface covering in club-shaped protein spikes. The Sun’s corona extends millions of kilometres into outer space and is most easily seen during a total solar eclipse, but it is also observable with a coronagraph.
This virus, the hemispherics, the heliotic sunspot activity of a collapsing wall. a City Petri in an old chaos of the sun. I read how virus secretion may increase in bat species undergoing habitat loss while imaging the high-rise apartments go up aside Wuhan seafood market in 09. Attaching a solar eclipse I found for you, Australia Nov 13 2012, a total one in a narrow corridor in the southern hemisphere. The corridor lay mostly over the ocean but also cut across the northern tip of Australia where we all gathered to watch. We wore goggles to protect our eyes, gazing at the dim structures around the edges of the sun. They are the sun’s atmosphere, the corona, which extends beyond the more easily seen surface, known as the photosphere. In modern times, we know that the corona is constantly on the move. Made of electrified gas, called plasma, the solar material dances in response to huge magnetic fields on the sun. Structural changes in these magnetic fields can also give rise to giant explosions of radiation called solar flares, or expulsions of solar material called coronal mass ejections, CMEs that make the corona a particularly interesting area to study.
Here are some other things I started reading, swept up in the virus multiplier:
A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019 (Na Zhu et. al, 2019, The New England Journal of Medicine)
From the NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafe- ty, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (N.Z., W.W., J.S., X.Z., B.H., R.L., P.N., X.M., D.W., W.X., G.W., G.F.G., W.T.), and the Department of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University (X.L.) — both in Beijing; Wu- han Jinyintan Hospital (D.Z.), the Divi- sion for Viral Disease Detection, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (B.Y., F.Z.), and the Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Acade- my of Sciences (W.T.) — all in Wuhan; and the Shandong First Medical Univer- sity and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China (W.S.). Address reprint requests to Dr. Tan at the NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National In- stitute for Viral Disease Control and Pre- vention, China CDC, 155 Changbai Road, Changping District, Beijing 102206, Chi- na; or at tanwj@ivdc.chinacdc.cn, Dr. Gao at the National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, China CDC, Beijing 102206, China, or at gaof@ im.ac.cn, or Dr. Wu at the NHC Key Labo- ratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, China CDC, Beijing 102206, China, or at wugz@ivdc.chinacdc.cn.
CT Imaging Features of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCov) (Chung et. al, 2020)
From the Department of Diagnostic, Molecular, and Interventional Radiology (M.C., A.B., M.H., Z.A.F., A.J.) and BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute (X.M., Y.Y., Z.A.F.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China (N.Z., X.Z.); Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China (J.C., W.X.); and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 52 East Meihua Rd, New Xiangzhou, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, China, 519000 (K.L., S.L., H.S.). Received January 28, 2020; revision requested and received January 31; accepted February 3. Address correspondence to H.S. (e-mail:Shanhong@mail.sysu.edu.cn).
I kept coming across the descriptor – ground glass opacities – had to look it up, it refers to an area of increased attenuation in the lung on computed tomography (CT) with preserved bronchial and vascular markings. It is a non-specific sign with a wide aetiology including infection, chronic interstitial disease and acute alveolar disease. GGO is also used in chest radiography to refer to a region of hazy lung radiopacity often fairly diffuse, in which the edges of the pulmonary vessels may be difficult to appreciate. Ground-glass opacities have a broad aetiology: normal expiration; partial filling of air spaces; partial collapse of alveoli; interstitial thickening; inflammation; oedema; fibrosis; lepidic proliferation of neoplasm Morphological forms: focal ground-glass opacification; diffuse ground-glass opacification; isolated diffuse ground-glass opacification
A couple days later I will see the lungs of the two Wuhan residents holidaying in Italy 2019-novel Coronavirus severe adult respiratory distress syndrome in two cases in Italy: An uncommon radiological presentation – the blue here dark retinal, Jarman’s, is also an ocean torrent, of a lung drowning in its own fluid – blue torrent – a deep unconscious wave of sentiment rushing through, refracting off of the GGOs in the plummet, the pulmonary into red, extremophilial heat, depth, debt vents, a NY-LON lung dyad crashing in slow motion against its own chest and in the hidden passages, the smaller alveoli uninsured passing first.
I I had a little bird, its name was Enza. I opened the window, and in flew Enza.
Pretty haunting with the kids voices. I found this University of Cambridge cartridge today, Spanish Flu, 1918 the forgotten pandemic, 50-100 million people died, some people drowned in their own phlegm – people spurting blood from their ears and noses. Descriptions of people turning blue, purple and dropping dead in the streets. Dr. AJ de Velthuis says in it, ‘what is particular about avian and epidemic viruses is that they replicate deep inside the lungs. When our cells detect the virus they trigger a very strong immune response that leads to an influx of white blood cells and fluids into our lungs that restricts the amount of air space that we have to breathe. Imagine that, drowning in your own rescue attempt – is it a suicide? or death carried through by an immune-blind inertia?
I’m reminded of the pawnbroker in Dostoevsky’s short story ‘Krotkaja’ – his wife having just leapt out of their window, clutching in her arms an icon of the Mother of God and he narrates the version of the events leading up to her death with her corpse now lying on the table before him – why did gloomy inertia smash that which was dearest of all? Inertia! O, nature! People on earth are alone, that’s what’s wrong […] everything is dead and there are corpses everywhere. People, alone, and around them, silence – such is the earth! He goes on, ‘they say that people standing on an altitude somehow gravitate of their own accord downwards, into the abyss. I think that many suicides and murders have been committed simply because the revolver had already been taken in hand. That is also an abyss, it’s a forty-five degree inclined plane which one has no choice but to slide down, and something invincibly causes you to pull the trigger. […] What’s most offensive is the fact that all this is an accident – a simple, barbarous, inertial accident! This is the offence! Five minutes, only five minutes late! Had I come five minutes sooner – then the moment would have flown by like a cloud, and it would never again have come into her head.
I know I’ve gone far off topic but inertia seems to be at the heart of things here, inertia and timing – they had the first announcement today, London is well ahead of the curve, they expect cases to multiply rapidly in the next few days, we should self isolate, or if a member of the family has the symptoms, household isolate. And it’s inertia, in the lack of ventilators and ICU nurses that the black swan has thrown up, I have become hyper-perceptive to the cleanliness of my hands and where I am in a space, I walked in the woods earlier up towards Burgh Heath, passed an elderly man twice head down balding past without word, two elderly dog walkers – you’re dog is very strong, low centre of gravity – low centre of gravity like the old bald machine man whirring past in the canopy that was fallen only weeks past by the storms here – washing the hands after every touch of a major surface, after I purchased the two boxes of Krave, a new obsession the Co-op on a tip off that they were re-stocking, I knelt to place them in a rucksack save the stockpiler’s shame, and placed my phone temporarily in my mouth, I spent the journey angling to spit my stupidity, fearing the virus, the social distancing mirror neural divorce from one own hands and face. The loo roll chase, the inertial subconscious thrum of fear into traffic lines into bowls of hot future shit. Another UC, unintended consequence of this all might be the birth of the bidet in UK waters.
they think Edvard Munch’s Scream may have sprung from flu-darkened thoughts. ‘One evening I was walking along a path, the city was on one side and the fjord below, I felt tired and ill. I stopped and looked out over the fjord – the sun was setting, and the clouds turning blood red. I sensed a scream passing through nature; it seemed to me that I heard the scream.’ I found the most terrifying passages in Pale Rider on how influenza draining the world of colour to its victims. The clerk who worked in the City of London and didn’t turn up for work one day, taking a train instead to Weymouth and throwing himself in the sea. People reported dizziness, insomnia, loss of hearing or smell, blurred vision. Flu can cause inflammation of the optic nerve, and one well-documented effect of that is impaired colour vision. Many patients remarked, on regaining consciousness, how washed out and dull the world appeared to them–as if those cyanosed faces had drained all the colour from it. ‘Sitting in a long chair, near a window, it was in itself a melancholy wonder to see the colourless sunlight slanting on the snow, under a sky drained of its blue,’ wrote American survivor Katherine Anne Porter, in her autobiographical short story Pale Horse, Pale Rider.
And again on page 56: in the hospitals, it was said, at the same hour every night, ‘midnight tea’ was served to those who were beyond help, to speed them on their way to the ‘holy house’ – as coffin sellers euphemistically referred to the cemeteries. [those mass graveyards north of Qom, Iran just popped into my mind, dilating a hundred years] Were the rumours true, or were they some kind of collective hallucination, one city’s imagination let loose by fear? In the end, Nava concluded, it didn’t matter, because the impact was the same. Terror transformed the city, which took on a post-apocalyptic aspect. Footballers played to empty stadia. The Avenida Rio Branco was deserted, and all nightlife ceased. If you caught a glimpse of a human being in the streets, it was fleeting. They were always running, black silhouettes against a blood-red sky, their faces contorted in a Munch-like scream. ‘It just so happens that the memories of those who lived through those ‘days are colourless,’ wrote Nava, who may have experienced that strange distortion of colour perception reported by other patients too. ‘No trace of early morning tints, shades of blue in the sky, twilight hues or moonlight silver. Everything appears covered in an ashen grey or a rotten red and brings back memories of rain and funeral rites, slime and catarrh.”
I’ll write again tomorrow and start including more scientific papers / links – I feel the virus has opened a remarkable zone where the real has come home to roost – it’s like a curtain has been dropped from the eyelid, maybe another UC after all this will be Londoners shirking the pointless rat race, though I think this 16 mile slight elevation staring across at the square mile from Epsom golf course has given me a slight Messianic complex that I worry in reality as equally inertial as the principles ruling the lives of the active city folk – it might like F.D. again says be a more conscious inertia, sitting with arms at rest, not moving at all on a story you have had in your mind forever, but it is still governed by the blind continuance of a mindless motion over which I / they have no control. I guess in a sense the virus opens up a bit of space for thought, for once – fuck I’m there again stuck in the actionless fort.
I called [ ] at 5:30, again after [ ] wanted to check up on cough, [ ] said its allergies from the dog – schools staying open, again timings and curves.
[
I watched 1917 on the weekend, I remembered just now because those times are on my mind 1917 1918 2019 2020 – the pandemic arc, remember the final scene, in surreal white chalk and then I watched back this morning what Mark Kermode had to say about the film, and I got the strange sense that he was prophecying on the storm to come with the virus. Here it is verbatim, I’ve attached the cartridge to the right – again get the sense that reality and fiction are running ever closer, and in the cinema right now Pale Rider, Clint Eastwood’s 1985 western is playing at the BFI Southbank as the pale rider sweeps through the coffee holders outside – the irony is not lost, nor the strange sense that either I am going mad or I am in the final throes of a Truman show – everything connects:
“When we talk about this continuous shot as he said there, it is a 10 minute sequence but a series of continuous shots put together to give the impression of a single continuous image, albeit with certain ellipses as well because there are moments when things happen. But the film basically plays out as a single continuous experience and the story is very simple – you need to get from here to there to stop this thing happening.”
So that setup is really simple – what that continuous single shot thing does is it puts you in the position of the two main characters because you discover the world as they discover it, the cinematography is extraordinary – it follows, it overtakes, sometimes you get a god’s eye view, but generally you see the world of these different landscapes as they find it out [it’s not dissimilar here right now with the virus, one continuous single image discovering its world as it comes] …it was very interesting that Sam Mendes invoked horror films there – you don’t want to know what is around the corner but you have to go, because it is also significant that although as he says the film is not a film with bloodshed in it, it is a film with the horror of violence writ large, there is going through those wastelands that are almost like underworld it’s you know the carnage and violence of war I think is very very well portrayed and done in a way which really makes you think this is dangerous, also in terms of the theatrical experience of seeing the film, there were 3 moments where I nearly jumped out of my skin, and you would know because you were sitting next to me, there’s one, there’s two particular sequences in which I gasped and there’s one which I thought was brilliantly done in which something appears to be happening a long way away and then almost unnoticed is happening very very close and that really did give me, I mean I thought it was really beautifully orchestrated because it was a thing about something in the distance seemed strange and then something up close seems really really horrifying. [the way we watched the virus in China, it only took 2 weeks to arrive here, like a fighter plane slowly entering the frame] And I did feel all the way through that those characters were in peril, and I didn’t know how the story was going to play out, and I really liked the fact that the film basically told you the information as the characters found it out.
I think the other thing that’s really important about it is that it does have, for all of its reality, for all its feet in the mud, in the trenches, and the actual physicality of what they have to do, there are some strange surreal sequences, there’s a sequences in which everything appears to be illuminated in a yellow phosphorescent haze, there is very clear religious analogy built into the fabric of the story, there are moments when it appears to be a kind of Homeric Odyssey and I think that was a phrase that Sam used himself. There are times when the journey that they’re having to do through these different landscapes appears to be like an underworld, overworld exploration, is it daytime, is it nighttime, also the fact that the way the film is constructed, without giving anything away about this, it is bookended with scenes which mirror each other, which mirror the entirety of the narrative – it begins in a certain way and it ends in a certain way that almost lends a dream like quality to everything that has happened, I thought the performances were terrific, the music is great, it is significant that one of the most important scenes in the film is a scene that uses song and uses the power of music, because in a film in which the evocation of the violence of war and the tragedy of war which I think are brilliantly captured in George Mackie’s eyes, the youth and the old before their time and lost before their time [when Boris first made that statement about loved ones being lost before their time]
It was interesting Sam Mendes said that thing where he said people thought that they were going to win, and I was thinking about Peter Jackson’s they shall not grow old in which we heard the voices of people saying, yeah we know we thought it was going to be an adventure almost, and it was interesting that Jackson The way in which the film is choreographed it is significant that there are moments in it in whih music is very important, and there is this moment in which the film stops, is stopped by a moment of song which brings everyone together in this kind of quasi-religious silence I found very very moving and affecting [I sense we’re still waiting for this moment, but the Italians, singing, singing on their balconies in isolation reminded me a little], so as a piece of direction, it uses that one shot in inverted commas format very well, and I thought that as a simple story of going from here to here is actually became metaphysical as it was doing it.
A female and male couple in their 60 s both residents of the city of Wuhan, China, travelled to Italy for holidays. The 66-year-old female patient was under oral hypertension treatment, and the 67-year-old male patient was apparently healthy. On January 28, whilst in Rome, they simultaneously fell ill with respiratory symptoms and fever and were admitted the following day, on January 29, to the high level isolation unit at the Lazzaro Spallanzani National Institute of Infectious Diseases, in Rome, Italy. nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs from both patients were positive for SARS-COV2 infection when tested using the SARS-COV2 Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase (RT)-PCR (Corman et al., 2020). Both patients developed progressive respiratory failure on day 4 and clinical evidence of ARDS with mechanical ventilation support in intensive care unit was reported on day 6 in the male patient, and, after 12 h on day 7, in the female patient. At the time of submission on February 9 (day 12 since symptom onset), both patients are still mechanically ventilated in Intensive Care Unit in critical but stable clinical conditions.
Several recent studies (Chan et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2020; Chung et al., 2020; Kanne, 2020; Koo et al., 2018; Lei et al., 2020; Liu and Tan, 2020; Pan and Guan, 2020; Song et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020) have described common chest imaging findings of lung pathology caused by SARS-COV2. The imaging findings recently reported in patients with COVID-19 appear similar to those reported with SARS-CoV (Ooi et al., 2004, Nestor et al., 2004, Nicolaou et al., 2003) and MERS-CoV (Das et al., 2015a, Das et al., 2015b) infection. Our patients showed some new and remarkable imaging findings seen in follow-up chest X-Rays and CT scans of these 2 cases who progressed to develop adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Lung patterns in both patients were characterized by hypertrophy of the pulmonary vessels, which are increased in size, particularly in areas with more pronounced interstitial impairment. This new radiological evidence suggests a different pattern of lung involvement compared to those observed in the other known severe coronavirus infections (SARS and MERS) (Ooi et al., 2004, Nicolaou et al., 2003) where pulmonary vessel vasoconstriction was possibly related to the presence of vasoactive substance within the lesions (Wenhui Li et al., 2003).
In these two cases, the increased diameter of the perilesional pulmonary vessels grew by extending the pulmonary alterations. During the follow-up examinations, a tubular and enlarged appearance of pulmonary vessels with a sudden caliber reduction was reported. They were mainly found in the dichotomic tracts, where the center of a new insurgent pulmonary lesion was seen (Figure 6a, b).
This sign is likely to be related to the hyperemia induced by the viral infection, and if consistent and validated by further observations, could be described as an early alert radiological sign to predict initial lung deterioration. Other findings of interest reported previously (Chung et al., 2020) were the presence in all scan examinations of mediastinal lymphadenopathy with short-axis oval nodes up to 1 cm and the presence of pleural effusion, first as unilateral and then subsequently bilateral; as it increased with the worsening of the symptoms.
I found this live streamed video, 02 March 2020 – how China is now using 5G technology to undertake remote CT scans on COVID-19 cases from Hubei, the epicentre of the outbreak. Over 100 patients in West China Hospital, Sichuan Province are queuing up to get diagnosed.””There are people having close contact with COVID-19 patients in Hubei,” Li Zhenlin, deputy director of the radiology department at West China Hospital of Sichuan University, told CGTN. “We need to help screen them via CT scans. They’ve got CT equipment there, but a lack of experts makes it difficult to handle the demand,” Li said, adding that remote scanning can help relieve the pressure.
Daily press briefings – 16.03 flattening the curve / other countries are in different stages in their movement up the curve, our intervention should be timely – foreshadowing the curve. Another UC of the virus seems to be a sightline into Italy, Spain, Germany – feels a bit strange all moving up these forecast curves, the wave is coming, Italy deaths have surpassed 2500 – China has agreed to send more ventilators and masks – read an article https://www.cfr.org/blog/what-covid-19-pandemic-may-mean-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative ” CCP officials are working to shift the global narrative surrounding their delayed and often-harsh response to the outbreak by championing its eventual (and tenuous) success. China is even beginning to provide material aid to BRI countries afflicted by the pandemic, including to Italy where in a recent call between foreign ministers China announced plans to sell Italy ventilators, masks, protective gear, and test kits. This week China made a similar pledge of medical support to Spain. If Beijing is remembered not primarily for its initial cover-up and harsh containment tactics, but as a source of eventual pandemic support, this will surely change the way that BRI countries see the wisdom of working closely with and relying on China. | London is ahead on the inflection point of proliferation, measures trying to flatten that out – epidemic expect to double every five days so we expect many more cases from last week – the absolutely key thing is ramping up our ability to test – who had had the disease rather than who has just got it now – how many have had it and been asymptomatic? That is a huge unknown worldwide that is we could get a handle on it would really change things
17.03 If yesterday framed on flattening the virus’s curve, today seems to be about the economic virus Boris: the Italian health system is excellent, the problem is not with the numbers of sufferers all requiring the same services at once….we may have to go further and faster in the coming days to protect lives… all we can and as quickly as we can to… more beds, more ventilators more staff… feels strange this being said when the Blue camp and austerity has woven into the NHS cuts in the last decade, another UC of the virus, the long term deep limbic opening in the nation’s neural wiring… War redistributes not only lateral wealth, ties, promises, but vertical functions, functions of the executive, priorities… the virus is everything ever written on 21st Century systemic risk, cascades – everything connects in a paranoiac way, I have started washing my hands in overdrive, refraining from touching my face, walking at a distance, the Guardian published how Coronavirus deals China’s economy ‘a bigger blow than global financial crisis’ – https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/16/coronavirus-deals-chinas-economy-a-bigger-blow-than-gfc–
China has suffered even deeper economic damage from the coronavirus pandemic than predicted, with figures released by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) on Monday showing factory production inside the country dropped at the fastest pace seen in three decades. Financial analysts have said the economic impact of the pandemic may have cut China’s growth in half during the first quarter. Industrial output fell 13.5% in January-February, compared with 2019, which ING economist Iris Pang told AFP was the first contraction since January 1990, when industrial production shrank 21.1%.. And in DW https://www.dw.com/en/coronavirus-shock-vs-global-financial-crisis-the-worse-economic-disaster/a-52802211 The economic upheaval caused by the COVID-19 outbreak has revived memories of the 2008-09 global financial crisis (GFC): recession chatter, bloodbath on global stock markets, governments and central banks loosening the purse strings. The pandemic, which has claimed thousands of lives across continents, has virtually brought the world economy to a standstill with millions of people placed under lockdown and global supply chains thrown into disarray due to the virus wreaking maximum havoc in China — the world’s factory. Going to look for videos, maybe a webcam from a port, reports
2230 BBC London News segment, light blue viral studio background, Public Health England graphic with London in a bold red background reminded of Forensic A logo, London hockeysticking, ahead of the curve – key element working out who has had the virus and recovered from it asymptomatically, that would bring down the overall mortality rate, more questions around testing regime, looking at China as people return to work there whether the virus will make a resurgence, reports in Japan of someone getting COVID-19 a second time. 0:29, with a London sunset in the backing, London eye is pinkluminescent, as is the horizon line, the rest a deep blue “either way the Prime Minister said he wanted Londoners especially to take limited social contact and working from home where possible seriously – if the trains and tubes are anything to go by… 0:50 the Day The Capital Split between those who can work from home and those who can’t, deserted stations, blue seats 1:15 stretching eternal downcarriage – eerie 08:35 service Maidenhead in Berkshire to Paddington a ghost ship…Victoria line, nova city vessel empty, sole train attendant, orange jacket signalling, switching to a weekend service. 01:58: Kings Cross at 8am from a circling drone, escalator surreal empty…then I got up and started walking, out the living room, through the kitchen, sound of silence’, hallway, open front door, 2230dark, 02:45 empty street, crossing lights alternating, sole plane overhead, lights stretching down the alternating road, 3:32 back in, dog, blonde mop, follow, sound of silence ending in kitchen.
Coronavirus latest, Financial Times, RED, deep red, searched for oil, take you through a flash crash of oil slump
Saudi Arabia initiating a price war with Russia, the war within a war, I wander what’s happening in Idlib, in the Turkey-Syria standoff, the refugee crisis has also been lost to the onshore virus.
Brent crude falls to near $26 per barrel Oil prices tumbled to a near 17-year low, falling close to 10 per cent on the likelihood of significantly lower demand and Saudi Arabia’s decision to increase supply. Kremlin says it would like to see higher oil prices. David Sheppard in London and Henry Foy in Moscow report: Russia has said it would like to see higher oil prices in the first acknowledgement that the crash in crude to near $25 a barrel is proving painful for its economy. | Oil prices have roughly halved this month since Saudi Arabia launched an oil price war following Russia’s refusal to join the kingdom in making deeper production cuts to respond to the demand-sapping effects of the coronavirus pandemic. Of course this is a low price, I would like it to be higher,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Wednesday. In response to a question regarding the potential of Russia re-engaging with Opec and Saudi Arabia, Mr Peskov said:
We monitor the situation on the international oil markets very carefully, we analyze this situation and try to make short-term forecasts and medium-term forecasts. A position will be formulated, depending on these. Russia has previously said it can withstand lower oil prices for years due to having built up its financial reserves. The country requires a lower price — around $45 a barrel — to balance its budget than Saudi Arabia. The kingdom is raising supply to the market by almost a quarter next month, to near 12.3m barrels a day, discounting its crude to try win customers. Saudi Arabia and Russia have cancelled technical meetings of the Opec+ alliance, which was previously restricting output in a bid to prop up prices. But some analysts believe Saudi Arabia wants to push Russia back to the table by crashing the price as quickly as possible. The coronavirus pandemic has slashed demand as travel slows and airlines are grounded.
2020-03-18 17:59:40 Hastings Pier Wide View | 19:07:30 Bojano, Italy
Dr John Campbell – 12:30 “no new cases of domestic spread in China, 39 cases from abroad back flow cases, Hong Kong – dropping defences and community clusters of virus developing in HK, – evidence that if you just take away social distancing the spread will come back – this is long haul fight. In US, 14,250 cases, young people behaving as if we are not in a pandemic, congregating as are are condemning other people to death by doing this – young people appear to have gotten quite ill with the virus – affecting different populations with different lifestyles differently, not a genetic factor but the diet in U.S. may not be as good as the diet in Germany. U.S. no overseas travel, the importance of the delay is going to be measured in human lives unfortunately. California state expect 25 million infections over next 8 weeks – defeatist – do the sums if 12% quite ill, 4% critically ill, huge numbers – [16:45] Italy, heartbreaking scenes – open modern country, good healthcare infrastructure but death rate climbed by 427, 3405 deaths by Thursday. Italy’s curve is ahead – let’s learn from it and follow the South Korean and Chinese approach.
Germany – deaths quite low 15320 confirmed, 20 deaths – hard to say why it has been so low in Germany, there has been a lot of testing so it means they are aware of more cases, and we know that 80% of cases are probably going to be mild so the more you test the lower your fatality rate will generally be – of course health services are very good in Germany and as of a few days ago weren’t overwhelmed which makes a huge difference to your case fatality rate UK panic buying is pathetic – key workers being looked after, Spain 18,077 cases, hotels being used as hospitals.
[18:33] this idea of the curve is just so important. The curve in Europe is going to go hugely higher if we don’t take levelling measures to lower the curve – without this the curve is going to go way way higher. 19:55 what we need to realise is that the curves in different countries are in different places – Italy – red curve | Spain – blue curve | France – green curve | UK – grey curve These curves are all going up but without interventions these curves are going to look much the same shape, so unfortunately where Italy is now other European countries might be in a few weeks – hence the seriousness – bottom line today is life has to change from now on for the next weeks and months, if we are to prevent these disastrous increases in cases.
20.03 2140 watched The Place Beyond the Pines on BBC Iplayer – surreal a lot of mirroring layers to it, not expecting the 15 year jump forward – mirroring elements also in COVID-19, waiting for a wave to come looking across the Channel at Italy, Spain – curves mirroring – difficulty thinking the wave.
2330 – read an interview of a UK A&E Consultant with Sky News – the UK’s coronavirus outbreak could be worse than Italy’s and hospitals may be ‘completely swamped’ – the Italian system is ‘in advance of us in terms of resources and intensive care beds’, he said, and it could be days until some hospitals reach capacity and patients begin spilling out into corridors.
The medic who works on the front line at a south London hospital and wanted to stay anonymous, said COVID-19 had been ‘described as the flu’ but ‘really isn’t – not the way we are seeing it.’ He said people were coming in with ‘full-blown, really nasty pneumonia.’ The only way to get control of the outbreak is through a ‘fairly strict lockdown’, he said, warning that ‘somebody you know’ is likely to be affected. ‘We know what’s coming and we know what’s coming is extremely big’. He and his colleagues will have to make life and death decisions, allocating resources ‘only to those deemed most likely to survive.’ (https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-whats-coming-is-extremely-big-uk-consultant-says-outbreak-could-be-worse-than-in-italy-11960994
2340 – onset of shooting pains in legs, and high temperature in night next to, strange dream of something crawling out of ear beside pillow come back after that spider bit 2 weeks ago, also fever-like, L said he had during week off from work – waked across the downs at 2000, field smelt chemical, light high up in clouds, sky looked big, filmed for 4 minutes – was moving strangely, not usual plane lights, hovering more – imagined covid19 sent by extraterrestrials, watching the ants dance before arrival. – have the video on phone
Lightening news – saw video out of Israel of man walking dog on lead by drone, a Day 5 Adele concert with Haribos – received from riqs WhatsApp “‘don’t curve the coronavirus, message from an ex-MP from Egypt: Don’t curve the coronavirus, it’s brought back humanity, Brought back people to their Creator and to their morals It closed down bars, night clubs, brothels, casinos It brought down interest rates, Brought families together, Stopped lewd behaviour, It has stopped people eating dead and forbidden animals, So far it has moved one third of military expenditure to healthcare, Arab Countries have banned shisha, Coronavirus is pushing people to make duals, It undermines dictators and their powers, Humans are worshipping God rather than progress and technology, It Is forcing authorities to look at its prisons and prisoners, It has taught humans how to sneeze, yawn and cough as was taught by our Prophet (sallallaahu alaihe wa sallaam) over 1400 years ago, Coronavirus is now making us stay at home, living simple lives and we make chukar to Allah swt for waking us up to reality and to giving us an opportunity to ask Him for His forgiveness and His help. There is a great lesson in this for those who are wise. “
On Channel Blue 2020-03-18 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr5UHP9lDcU&t=163s) I wrote
off-screen and out of lens, there is also a growing sense in the colour blue – the blue that surrounds us as an island, that makes this room an isolated tower, that yawns open in the sudden loss of friction and traction and touch in the closure.
But Channel Blue is also the wars or crises off-lens that cool while the mainlines focalise on COVID-19 – there’s a dual movement at play – the cameras come onshore, focalise on the UK, and a simultaneous movement out onto the mirror curves in Europe – but have seen less on how COVID-19 is unfolding in the refugee camps, the heating up war between Turkey and Syria, the war in Yemen – did a quick google of each, in Yemen Alex Emmons in The Intercept:
Yemen’s health sector is far beyod its limits. He notes a report, produced jointly by Physicians for Human Rights and the Yemen-based human rights organization Mwatana for Human Rights, documents four years of attacks against health care facilities in the country, part of a global trend that has led to a record rise in attacks on health care workers and facilities in war zones.
Based on nearly 200 interviews, cross-checked with witness statements, photographs, and media and NGO reports, the report documents 120 attacks against medical facilities across 20 of Yemen’s 22 governorates between March 2015, when Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates started a war there with U.S. backing, and the end of 2018.
During the war, the health care system has been strained by preventable diseases, and the breakdown in sanitation led to the largest cholera outbreak in modern history, reaching more than a million cases. Before the war, Yemen was heavily dependent on foreign medical workers — many of whom have returned home — and imported virtually all of its pharmaceuticals and medical equipment.
Import and access restrictions from a Saudi and Emirati naval blockade, fighting, and siege-like conditions across swaths of the country have led to shortages in medicine and equipment. And while comprehensive data on the number of health facilities in Yemen is not public, the U.N. Office of for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs has said that only 51 percent of the country’s health centers “remain fully functional.
Co-morbidities that have emerged in Yemen’s siege environment intersecting with covid-19 could create a humanitarian disaster of huge dimension. in another strand of reality Saudi Arabia have stepped up the price war with Russia,
“On the other hand, I revised many passages and tried to do something about the amnesic defects of the original—blank spots, blurry areas, domains of dimness. I discovered that sometimes, by means of intense concentration, the neutral smudge might be forced to come into beautiful focus so that the sudden view could be identified, and the anonymous servant named.”
Excerpt From: Vladimir Nabokov. “Speak, Memory”.
Thermonuclear Monarchy: Choosing Between Democracy and Doom (Elaine Scarry)
Habit is never seen as something that makes a slight adjustment in the character of sensory perception, dulling perception (if one judges habit to be a negative) or enhancing it (if one judges it as positive). It is instead understood to cut to the heart of sensation, closing it down entirely or building up perception at its own interior and even bringing it into being. If these two views are taken together, they do not balance one another or cancel one another out. Remarkably, they together work to validate the positive view. They together show that habit is an immensely powerful agent for regulating, even creating, the acuity of sentience. Just as one may regulate the amount of light by opening and closing one’s eyelids or by turning and tilting one’s head through hundreds of angles and planes, so habit acts to set in place countless gateways that either open and allow the world to rush toward one or instead close it to keep it wholly at bay. ” “Samuel Beckett called habit “a great deadener” (despite the fact that throughout his plays, lifesaving rules of survival always entail elaborate repertoires of habit).” […] “Any theorist who holds that sensory acuity is achieved by habit will also be a theorist committed to education. So William James writes, “Could the young but realize how soon they will become mere walking bundles of habits, they would give more heed to their conduct while in the plastic state. We are spinning our own fates. . . . Every smallest stroke of virtue or of vice leaves its never so little scar.”205 Aristotle’s formulation is even stronger: “It makes no small difference then, whether we form habits of one kind or another from our youth; it makes a very great difference, or rather all the difference.
“[D]istinct and independent sensory qualities, far from being original elements, are the products of a highly skilled analysis which disposes of immense technical scientific resources. To be able to single out a definitive sensory element in any field is evidence of a high degree of previous training, that is, of well-formed habits. A moderate amount of observation of a child will suffice to reveal that even such gross discriminations as black, white, red, green, are the result of some years of active dealings with things in the course of which habits have been set up. It is not such a simple matter to have a clear-cut sensation. The latter is a sign of training, skill, habit.
If, as Dewey argues, it takes “some years of active dealing with things” to reliably discriminate green, blue, or red, how many years of practice are required to reach the adult state in which the average human being is capable of distinguishing 26,000 colors, or over 2.3 million if “gray value” (or lightness) is included?208 In turn, what ardor and practice are required to move beyond these “average” capacities to become an exquisite colorist like the Venetians (with their habits of optical mixing), or like Matisse (whose paintings induce retinal arabesques), or like the virtuoso landscape gardeners Gertrude Jekyll or Claude Monet? In addition to habits of sensation, Dewey frequently speaks of habits of acute observation and inference,209 habits of thought and active inquiry.210 But the acuity of sensory perception remains key. It allows us “to respond freshly and generously to each incident in life.” The fact that habit is held responsible for both insensitivity and supersensitivity works to credit the positive place of habit in sensory cognition. (It means that through habit we can affect our perceptual acuity, dampening down aversive or distracting sensations while magnifying the acuity of desirable sensations. The neurological basis of this two-directional plasticity has been worked out with extraordinary clarity in one particular realm of sensory perception, not color or odor or sound or taste but that of touch, specifically physical pain. The revolutionary but widely accepted “gate control theory of pain”—developed “by neuroscientist Ronald Melzack and biologist Patrick Wall—rejects the Cartesian picture of an external pain stimulus acting on the surface of the body and ringing a bell cord that proceeds in a linear fashion to the brain. It posits instead a gate on the spinal cord where—even before we begin to feel the pain or identify the part of the body where it is taking place—cultural habits, familial habits, and individual habits are brought to bear on the apprehension of the pain, either closing down the gate so that we do not feel the sensation as acutely as the stimulus itself would warrant or opening the gate more widely so that its aversive affects are felt in full force.213 The complex neurobiology at work in the brain’s gate control structure may one day help us come to understand the neural structures that clarify the way habit and learning work in wholly pain-free forms of sensory perception, whether seeing color or hearing a bird’s song. It will help to explain why learning, and self-directed habits of attention, can vastly magnify our sensory powers.”
John Dewey, Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology (New York: Henry Holt, 1922), p. 31. In How We Think, Dewey suggests that what makes color particularly hard for a child is that unlike many other sensory events, it does not elicit from him a specific response or adjustment: “By rolling an object, the child makes its roundness appreciable; by bouncing it, he singles out its elasticity; by throwing it, he makes weight its conspicuous distinctive factor. . . . The redness or greenness or blueness of the object [in contrast] does not tend to call out a reaction that is sufficiently peculiar to give prominence or distinction to the color trait” (The Middle Works of John Dewey 1899–1924, vol. 6, ed. Jo Ann Boydston [Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1985], pp. 275–76).”
Beckett’s conception of time can be seen reflected in his own works: for example, the nameless characters of ‘Imagination Dead Imagine’ and ‘The Lost Ones’ are both subject and victim of time. The changes of light and heat in both stories communicate the viscerality of time. Time is not, for Beckett, something that facilitates the progression of a narrative, but a concept that is in itself violent. We can see this reiterated later in Proust when Beckett constructs time as subjective to each character. Beckett writes
But the poisonous ingenuity of Time in the science of affliction is not limited to its own action on the subject, that action as has been shown, resulting in an unceasing modification of his personality, whose permanent reality, if any, can only be apprehended as a retrospective hypothesis. The individual is the seat of a constant process of decantations from the vessel containing the fluid of future time, sluggish, pale and monochrome, to the vessel containing the fluid of past time, agitated and multicoloured by the phenomena of its hours
At the best, all that is realized in Time (all Time produce), whether in Art or Life, can only be possessed successively, by a series of partial annexations—and never integrally and at once.
Every time she saw a videotape of the planes she moved a finger toward the power button on the remote. Then she kept on watching. The second plane coming out of that ice blue sky, this was the footage that entered the body, that seemed to run beneath her skin, the fleeting spirit that carried lives and histories, theirs and hers, everyone’s, into some other distance, out beyond the towers. … a concept of memory that is universal rather than individual
The skies she retained in her memory were dramas of cloud and sea storm, or the electric sheen before summer thunder in the city, always belonging to the energies of sheer weather, of what was out there, air masses, water vapor, westerlies. This was different, a clear sky that carried human terror in those streaking aircraft, first one, then the other, the force of men’s intent. He watched with her. Every helpless desperation set against the sky, human voices crying to God and how awful to imagine this, God’s name on the tongue of killers and victims both, first one place and then the other, the one that was nearly cartoon human, with flashing eyes and teeth, the second plane, the south tower. (Source: “The Pure Event”—Terrorism and Temporality in the Works of Thomas Pynchon and Don DeLillo, Gourley 2014 and Waiting for Godot)
I have journeyed back in thought—with “thought hopelessly tapering off as I went—to remote regions where I groped for some secret outlet only to discover that the prison of time is spherical and without exits.”
Rapid growth, quantum-quick thought, the roller coaster of the circulatory system—all forms of vitality are forms of velocity, and no wonder a growing child desires to out-Nature Nature by filling a minimum stretch of time with a maximum of spatial enjoyment. Innermost in man is the spiritual pleasure derivable from the possibilities of outtugging and outrunning gravity, of overcoming or re-enacting the earth’s pull. The miraculous paradox of smooth round objects conquering space by simply tumbling over and over, instead of laboriously lifting heavy limbs in order to progress, must have given young mankind a most salutary shock. The bonfire into which the dreamy little savage peered as he squatted on naked haunches, or the unswerving advance of a forest fire—these have also affected, I suppose, a chromosome or two behind Lamarck’s back, in the mysterious way which Western geneticists are as disinclined to elucidate as are professional physicists to discuss the outside of the inside, the whereabouts of the curvature; for every dimension presupposes a medium within which it can act, and if, in the spiral unwinding of things, space warps into something akin to time, and time, in its turn, warps into something akin to thought, then, surely, another dimension follows—a special Space maybe, not the old one, we trust, unless spirals become vicious circles again.
The above database is from Johns Hopkins Center for Systems Science and Engineering. The data sources include the World Health Organization, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, local media reports, local health departments, and the DXY, one of the world’s largest online communities for physicians, health care professionals, pharmacies and facilities.
Just came across the videos of Neil Halloran – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIAF7kBbGKk searching on YouTube that Stalin quote, a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic. In the second – Nuclear Threat – The Shadow Peace, there are some remarkable visuals from 04:33, red dots proliferating across the United States in a simulated nuclear war scenario study of 2000 strikes from FEMA and NADC and the sound like nuclear decay rain patter on an aluminum Point Break beach hut roof, sweeping the American frontier to California, 05:02 the camera pans to “probable targets” in UK and France from a UK declassified 2014 document, an arc sweeping into northern and central France, new red dots then spwan across Central Europe, Bremen, Dortmund, Frankfurt Mannheim – Central European Targets, map leaked to CIA in 1970s… the United Stated Target List, 1956, declassified in 2015 shows red dots stretching throughout the eastern bloc, Budapest, Warsaw, on deeper into Kiev, Minsk, Odessa, Saint Persburg, 05:29, Moscow, Novogorod, Tbilisi, Baku, Tashkent, Novosibirsk – while Neil reads ‘the death count in the first three weeks of a nuclear war would depend on how many warheads launched and how many successfully hit their targets’ as the dots less dense now across Mongolia, barren eastern Russia [much of the sub Indian continent untouched] reaching Harbin, Chonqing, Shanghai, Beijing.
Something clicked gestalt between the coronavirus pandemic map from the Johns Hopkins Center, and that of the red dots in the nuclear simulation video – maybe it was the speed in which the world map rotated, chasing the tail of the proliferating madness – a nuclear mushroom cloud V pitted against the future-present respiratory wave – but there is also the sense that both belong firmly to different worlds – the first birthed in the Manhattan project, a war theatre – Oppenheimer’s I am become death, destroyer of worlds. But the red dots of covid-19 sight a little differently on the speciation chain – in the world of the accident, zoogenetic singularity, the cellular breakthrough of V to Patient 1 of a new weak host species to grow at V-speed across a cellular blob universe [would be interesting to imagine how V sees the world, V does not see with light like a human does, V is a name we have given V]. Then the surreal dimension: that the nucelar war dots never played out during a war that stayed cold. That now the red COVID dots are realising the very simulation – and complacency is a world locked into the brightness of the bomb flash, while V hammers off-lens in a border-between-world wet market.
The bomb is spherical, containable to sight, V has no dimensions, no shape – then what is V-speed to the Belt and Road? V-speed feels like so many multiples of ’08.
V’s arrival is history distilled to an intensive nuclear flash – time’s line distends in the barometric pulse – the way the windows blow out and the body becomes a photograph on a wall, and all time to now – spent focalising on the slow moving cogs of easternisation, world shifts, longue durees – is now just metabolic refuse of a fever overnight and Oppenheimer’s lament suffers over, we are become bereft, restarter of worlds.
Color-Shifting Stars: The Radial-Velocity Method
The radial-velocity method, also known as Doppler spectroscopy, was originally the most effective method for locating extrasolar planets from the ground. Since the launch of the Kepler space telescope in 2009, transit photometry has dominated exoplanet discoveries. The radial-velocity method relies on the fact that a star does not remain completely stationary when it is orbited by a planet. The star moves, ever so slightly, in a small circle or ellipse, responding to the gravitational tug of its smaller companion. When viewed from a distance, these slight movements affect the star’s normal light spectrum, or color signature. The spectrum of a star that is moving towards the observer appears slightly shifted toward bluer (shorter) wavelengths. If the star is moving away, then its spectrum will be shifted toward redder (longer) wavelengths.
Japanese artist Isao Hashimoto has created a beautiful, undeniably scary time-lapse map of the 2053 nuclear explosions which have taken place between 1945 and 1998, beginning with the Manhattan Project’s “Trinity” test near Los Alamos and concluding with Pakistan’s nuclear tests in May of 1998. This leaves out North Korea’s two alleged nuclear tests in this past decade (the legitimacy of both of which is not 100% clear). “2053” – This is the number of nuclear explosions conducted in various parts of the globe. Profile of the artist: Isao HASHIMOTO Born in Kumamoto prefecture, Japan in 1959. Worked for 17 years in financial industry as a foreign exchange dealer. Studied at Department of Arts, Policy and Management of Musashino Art University, Tokyo.
Dubai: Two million surgical masks, more than 200,000 advanced masks, 500,000 coronavirus testing kits and 17 tonnes of medical supplies. That’s the kind of massive support that’s heading for Europe as it battles the worst pandemic in recent history — with the global death toll soaring past 13,500 on Sunday
But this groundswell of supplies for Europe is not from the World Health Organisation or aid agencies, but from China — which until a few weeks back was overwhelmed by the coronavirus epidemic that began in the central Chinese city of Wuhan, accepting donations of masks and other medical aid from nearly 80 nations and 10 international organisations. Now, with new daily domestic cases dwindling into zero or single digits, China is mounting a diplomatic charm offensive to help shape the global response to the pandemic, even as the rest of the world struggles to get the virus under control. Last week, Chinese President Xi Jinping vowed to send more medical experts to Italy — the current epicentre of the global outbreak, where the total number of cases have crossed 53,000. That the same day, China sent 100,000 rapid diagnostic tests to the Philippines. It flew gloves and protective clothing to Liberia and more than 10 flights carrying millions of masks and other supplies to the Czech Republic. In Serbia, its president pleaded for assistance not from the country’s neighbours in Europe — which restricted the export of needed medical equipment — but from China.And in Sri Lanka, China extended a $500 million loan to help Sri Lanka combat the virus. From Japan to Iraq and Spain to Peru, China has stepped in with pledges of humanitarian assistance in the form of supplies or medical expertise — and the result is an aid blitz that has provided China the opportunity to reposition itself as a responsible global leader at a moment of unprecedented crisis. “We’re grateful for China’s support … We need each other’s support in times of need,” Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, tweeted in response to Beijing’s initiatives for Europe.
Building global cooperation
China has scrambled experts and equipment to Italy, and Xi was quoted as telling Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte in a phone call last week that Beijing is ready to work with Rome to contribute to international cooperation on epidemic control and to the building of a “Health Silk Road”. That latter concept is familiar to Italy, which last year became the first western European country to join China’s Belt and Road Initiative. The massive programme seeks to expand trade by building ports, roads and other transportation projects in a 21st century version of the fabled Silk Road. Chu Yin, a professor of public administration at the University of International Relations in Beijing, told the New York Times that this was not merely about China’s burgeoning influence in global geopolitics. “If people really expect a big boost of China’s influence through the aid, it will be difficult,” he said. “Let’s just take the aid as doing a good deed, and it would help China’s economy if the epidemic situation in these countries is contained.” “The underlying message is very clear: world leaders have to put petty political differences aside and work together on this one. This requires leadership but also from an understanding that we are all in this together. Put people before politics or profits,” Dr Unni Karunakara, Assistant Professor at Yale School of Public Health and former International President of Medicine Sans Frontiers, told Gulf News on Sunday.
Filling the void for Europe
As Europe becomes the epicentre of coronavirus, the US — and in some cases the EU — seem be turning away from helping individual states. Serbia and Estonia are cases in point, where the apparent EU indifference has coincided with Beijing stepping up its outreach to individual governments there. “It’s great that China has this availability and that it is currently in a position to offer this kind of help,” said Lucrezia Poggetti, an analyst at the Mercator Institute for China Studies in Berlin. Aid is much needed, she said, but in supplying it, China is also exercising its soft power. In doing so, China has stepped into a role that the West once dominated in times of natural disaster or public health emergency, and one that US President Donald Trump has increasingly given up in his “America First” retreat from global engagement. “The West is definitely more weak at this point in time, especially with the more isolationist strategy which the US has embarked on. If the global economy takes a huge hit due to coronavirus, the story might look different. The one who has the muscles will have the right to show leadership and will be asked to do so. This might be provide a historic opportunity for China. At this stage even the West might be willing to cede some historic positions to save the stability of the global economy,” Tomas Brunegard, Executive Chairman at the Gothenburg-based EuroAcademy and President of World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers, told Gulf News on Sunday.
Using deep pockets
As it has done in the past, the Chinese state is using its extensive tools and deep pockets to build partnerships around the world, relying on trade, investments and, in this case, an advantageous position as the world’s largest maker of medicines and protective masks. “This could be the first major global crisis in decades without meaningful US leadership and with significant Chinese leadership,” Rush Doshi, director of the China Strategy Initiative at the Brookings Institution in Washington, told news agencies. He noted that only a few years ago the US led the fight against Ebola. Now, the global failures in confronting the pandemic from Europe to the US have given the Chinese leadership a platform to prove that its model works — and potentially gain some lasting geopolitical currency. “I don’t know and now I don’t care,” Michele Geraci, a former undersecretary in the Italian economic development ministry, said when asked by reporters if the assistance reflected China’s geopolitical ambitions as much as humanitarian concerns. He said the urgent issue was to provide aid to save lives, something that Italy’s allies in the European Union had been unable or unwilling to do. “If somebody is worried China is doing too much, the gap is open to other countries,” he said. “This is what other countries should do.”
Help for WHO
Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic blasted the European Union and praised China for offering help when he announced a state of emergency to combat the outbreak. His country wants to join the EU, but his government has moved closer to Russia and China in a see-saw battle for influence. “I believe in my brother and friend Xi Jinping and I believe in China’s help,” Vucic said. “European solidarity,” he said, was just a fairy tale. China has given $20 million to the World Health Organisation for COVID-19 efforts. While the EU and the US have made larger pledges to combat the disease, they are now preoccupied by the crisis at home. The Chinese “are winning points,” said Theresa Fallon, the founder of the Centre for Russia Europe Asia Studies in Brussels. “Serbia thinks that China is their saviour.”
Reciprocating assistance
Six weeks ago, Chinese authorities were trying to quell anger at home. Now the criticism is raining down on governments from Tehran to Washington, DC. A visiting Chinese Red Cross official chastised Italy for letting so many people stroll the streets of Milan. “Right now we need to stop all economic activity, and we need to stop the mobility of people,’’ said Executive Chairman Sun Shuopeng. At one level, China is also reciprocating assistance it received. Nearly 80 countries sent supplies to China, some on charter flights they sent to evacuate their citizens from Wuhan. “It is China’s traditional virtue to repay goodwill with greater kindness,” Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said, citing an ancient Confucian saying: “You throw a peach to me, and I give you a white jade for friendship.”
the blue here dark retinal, Jarman’s, is also an ocean torrent, of a lung drowning in its own fluid – blue torrent – a deep unconscious wave of sentiment rushing through, refracting off of the GGOs in the plummet, the pulmonary into red, extremophilial heat, depth, debt vents, a NY-LON lung dyad crashing in slow motion against its own chest and in the hidden passages, the smaller alveoli uninsured passing first.
23.03.2020 London eastern Shard 06:15& how the sun looks like a nuclear explosion above Canary Wharf, and the metaphor is airborne for all that is imploding underneath.
https://covid19syllabus.substack.com | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLxpNiF0YKs
https://archive.org/details/borders/talking-border-kuril-islands-kimie-hara.mp3. – Talking Borders series
We need immediately to begin large-scale serological surveys — antibody testing — to assess what stage of the epidemic we are in now,” she said. The modelling by Oxford’s Evolutionary Ecology of Infectious Disease group indicates that Covid-19 reached the UK by mid-January at the latest. Like many emerging infections, it spread invisibly for more than a month before the first transmissions within the UK were officially recorded at the end of February. The research presents a very different view of the epidemic to the modelling at Imperial College London, which has strongly influenced government policy. “I am surprised that there has been such unqualified acceptance of the Imperial model,” said Prof Gupta. However, she was reluctant to criticise the government for shutting down the country to suppress viral spread, because the accuracy of the Oxford model has not yet been confirmed and, even if it is correct, social distancing will reduce the number of people becoming seriously ill and relieve severe pressure on the NHS during the peak of the epidemic. The Oxford study is based on a what is known as a “susceptibility-infected-recovered model” of Covid-19, built up from case and death reports from the UK and Italy. The researchers made what they regard as the most plausible assumptions about the behaviour of the virus. The modelling brings back into focus “herd immunity”, the idea that the virus will stop spreading when enough people have become resistant to it because they have already been infected. The government abandoned its unofficial herd immunity strategy — allowing controlled spread of infection — after its scientific advisers said this would swamp the National Health Service with critically ill patients.
Interesting argument emerging around whether economic virus to come could be greater than the biological virus at present – was thinking after 08 crash in the U.S. / mass foreclosures and the ensuing years of opioid addiction, overdoses and deaths, whether the economic fallout death rate of V could be worse than its respiratory toll in the coming months / years.
Another UC of V… perspective… the most microscopic and the largest are suddenly imploding, sky seems blue (25.03.2020 recording on dip in downs) – solar corona
https://chinaus-icas.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Indo-Pacific-Strategy-and-Chinas-Response.pdf | https://kr.usembassy.gov/110219-joint-fact-sheet-by-the-united-states-and-the-republic-of-korea-on-cooperation-between-the-new-southern-policy-and-the-indo-pacific-strategy/ || https://warontherocks.com/2019/12/japans-indo-pacific-strategy-shaping-a-hybrid-regional-order/
As the Royal Navy prepares to help the NHS and other government departments deal with the response to the coronavirus outbreak, nine British ships have been shadowing seven Russian vessels in waters around the UK. The Navy has completed a concentrated operation to shadow the Russian warships after unusually high levels of activity in the English Channel and North Sea. Type 23 frigates HMS Kent, HMS Sutherland, HMS Argyll and HMS Richmond joined Offshore Patrol Vessels HMS Tyne and HMS Mersey along with RFA Tideforce, RFA Tidespring and HMS Echo for the large-scale operation with support from NATO allies. Lieutenant Nick Ward, HMS Tyne’s Executive Officer, said: “As the Armed Forces are helping the NHS save lives in the UK, it’s essential the Navy continues to deliver the tasks we have always performed to help keep Britain safe. “This is very much part of routine business for HMS Tyne and represents one of the many roles our patrol vessels perform in support of the Royal Navy’s commitments.
“This is our core business and represents an enduring commitment to uphold the security of the UK.” As the Navy’s logistics specialists and military planners work with the wider Armed Forces to help the coronavirus response effort, Royal Navy sailors and aircrew were monitoring every movement of the Russian ships using state-of-the-art radar, surveillance cameras and sensors, allowing them to track their course and speed as they passed the British Isles. They were supported by Merlin and Wildcat helicopters of 814 and 815 Naval Air Squadrons. Portsmouth-based HMS Tyne spent more than a week working in the English Channel, in often challenging seas, keeping a close eye on the Russian vessels as they pass the south coast. Three Steregushchiy-class corvettes, two Ropucha-class landing ships and two Admiral Grigorovich-class frigates were observed during the operations, plus their supporting auxiliary ships and tugs. HMS Sutherland, fresh from a demanding period of Arctic training on Exercise Cold Response, watched over the Russian presence as part of her duties with NATO’s Standing NATO Maritime Group One – a very high readiness task group made up of frigates and destroyers which patrols northern European waters to provide a reassuring presence.
https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/node/4370 || Okolynaya Bay north of Severomorsk
why would Russian Navy be interested in these waters – https://www.railfreight.com/beltandroad/2018/05/01/china-eyes-polar-silk-road/?gdpr=accept
https://www.asiapacific.ca/blog/chinas-belt-and-road-strides-arctic-few-notice
big ideas – post BREXIT UK should rediscover its naval ocean expansive mind | rapidly losing space to Russia/China with outdates models of how world is shaped || perhaps fallout of V will not only be reinvigorated interest in manufacturing / engineering base of society (the ventilator creators) but also into the ventilative of the oceans, new corridors opening up about our peripheries in Channel Blue, but the financial vortex that is London sucks all in – London under the weight of its own financialised soul needs to re-orient, reconfigure into the real economy of the ocean corridors.
21.04.2020] Bruce Cumings – The Korean War: A History | also author of Parallax Visions: Making Sense of American–East Asian Relations at the End of the Century
McNamara derived these lessons from losing the Vietnam War: we did not know the enemy, we lacked “empathy” (we should have “put ourselves inside their skin and look[ed] at us through their eyes,” but we did not); we were blind prisoners of our own assumptions. In Korea we still are.
Korea is an ancient nation, and one of the very few places in the world where territorial boundaries, ethnicity, and language have been consistent for well over a millennium. It sits next to China and was deeply influ- enced by the Middle Kingdom, but it has al- ways had an independent civilization. Few understand this, but the most observant journalist in the war, Reginald Thompson, put the point exactly: “the thought and law of China is woven into the very texture of Korea … as the law of Rome is woven into Britain.” The distinction is between the ste- reotypical judgment that Korea is just “Little China,” or nothing more than a transmission belt for Buddhist and Confucian culture flowing into Japan, and a nation and culture as different from Japan or China as Italy or France is from Germany.
An underground factory in North Korea. | U.S. National Archives
The United States intervened first for the defense, and then for the offense: the worst happened, their territory was occupied by an American army. But China determined to de- fend its borders and support its comrades in arms. Soon the battle devolved into incon- clusive warfare along the central front, nego- tiations opened, and two years later an armistice was signed—except that the un- hindered machinery of incendiary bombing was visited on the North for three years, yielding a wasteland and a surviving mole people who had learned to love the shelter of caves, mountains, tunnels, and redoubts, a subterranean world that became the basis for reconstructing the country and a memento for building a fierce hatred through the ranks of the population. The leaders who survived draw a straight line from 1932, when their struggle began, through this terrible war, down to the present. Their truth is not cold, antiquarian, ineffectual knowledge, but “a regulating and punishing judge,”a burned- in conviction that their overriding goal is to persist until victory is finally won, and if the whole of the state needs to be subordinated to this task, so be it.
A BURNED-IN CONVICTION ON THE RETINA | A SOLARINE LESION
Thus we arrive at our absurd predicament, where the party of memory remains concen- trated on its main task, perfecting a world- historical garrison state that will do its bid- ding and hold off the enemy, and the party of forgetting and never-knowing pays sporadic attention only when it must, when the North seizes a spy ship or cuts down a poplar tree or blows off an A-bomb or sends a rocket in- to the heavens. Then the media waters part, we behold the evil enemy in Pyongy- ang—drums beat, sabers rattle—but nothing really happens, and the waters close over until the next time. We don’t approve of them but pay little attention and pat ourselves on the back, while they mimic Plato’s Republic or monolithic Catholicism or Stalin’s cadres: they engineer the souls of their people from on high, starting at the be- ginning just as their neo-Confucian forebears did, when a human being is all innocence and wonder, and continuing until they have at least the image if not the reality of perfect agreement and coherence, a “monolithicism” (their term) seeking a one-for-all great integ- ral that will smite the enemy. They think they know good and evil in their bones, but we aren’t so sure.
Notice how the inertia of deterrence (all sides are thoroughly deterred in Korea and have been since 1953) yields an ever-increas- ing capability for mayhem not just on one side, but on all sides. A new Korean War could break out tomorrow morning, and Americans would still be in their original state of overwhelming might and unfathomable cluelessness; armies ignorant of each other would clash again, and the outcome would again yield its central truth: there is no military solution in Korea (and there never was).
In 2009 the North Korean government was run by a National Defense Commission whose twelve members could constitute a short list of honored Korean War veterans. They are the keepers of the past, and the prisoners of it. This party of memory has braced itself against the pressures of past, present, and future since 1945, up against the greatest military power in world history.Americans think they know this story, of a vain, feckless, profligate, cruel, and dangerous leadership, symbolized by Kim Jong Il, but they are very wide of the mark. As for the leaders of that “indispensable power,” they know not the nature of this war nor the qualities of their enemy. This is not a matter of forgetting; it is a never-knowing, a species of unwilled ignorance and willed incuriosity, which causes them time and again to under- estimate the adversary—and thereby confer priceless advantage upon him. Finally, there is the evil, grinning image of the war itself, reaper of millions of lives and all for naught, because it continues, it is the odds-on survivor, it never ends. It returns in myriad forms—memory, trauma, ghosts, repression, the quotidian coiled tensions along the DMZ—to taunt the living, as the only “perfect tense” to survive Korea’s tragedies since the national division. was run by a National Defense Commission whose twelve members could constitute a short list of honored Korean War veterans. They are the keepers of the past, and the prisoners of it. This party of memory has braced itself against the pressures of past, present, and future since 1945, up against the greatest military power in world history.
The Pacific War began in 1931 and ended in 1945, just as the Korean War began in 1945 and has never ended, even if the fight- ing stopped in 1953. Nor has the North Korean–Japanese war that began in 1931–32 ever ended; South Korea normalized its rela- tions with Japan in 1965, but through many failed negotiations Pyongyang and Tokyo have never normalized or reconciled—and thus there has been no “closure” to either war from the North Korean standpoint; neither has come to an appropriate resolu- tion. These are not the American demarca- tions for these wars, of course, but many his- tories in Japan and Korea conventionally be- gin these two conflicts in 1931 and 1945, and the history-obsessed North Koreans trace a straight line from the present back to that long-lost first day of March in 1932. Those who suffer terrible wars have a finer sense of when they begin and when they end. If Americans have trouble reflecting on this “forgotten war” as a conflict primarily fought among Koreans, for Korean goals, they should hearken to the great chroniclers of their own civil war. International involve- ment was important—and particularly U.S. involvement—but the essential dynamic was internal to the peninsula, to this ancient na- tion that has known a continuous existence within well-recognized boundaries since the time of Mohammed. Korea remains divided so long after the Berlin Wall fell because this war cut so deeply into the body politic and the Korean soul.
The Greek word asu and the Latin word oriens connoted “rising sun” or “the east,” and for centuries everything east of Istanbul signified “lands of the rising sun,” just as occidens conjured the territory of the setting sun; Martin Luther identified Europe with the Abend (or evening) land, the Orient with the Morgen (morning) land.1 Now only Japan claims to be a land of the rising sun, and only anxious Americans identify their country with the setting sun. The world that has given us rises and falls and periodic eclipses is not that of Greece and Rome, however, but the industrial epoch, with its relative handful of advanced industrial states and their incessant competition. It is that solar system that Korea has now joined (and that is all I mean by the title).”
The twentieth century began with Japan’s defeat of Russia and its slow rise toward global stature, which also drew Japan toward disaster like a moth toward a flame. England and America were the Pacific powers of the first half of this century, and they welcomed Japan as a junior partner but not as a hegemon. In the new century Japan has lingering apprehensions about its ability to live comfortably with the rest of the world, and those apprehensions are nowhere greater than among its near neighbors. Japan is Icarus, flying toward the sun.
Korea was Oedipus, blinded by Japan’s swiftly rising glitter. Gazing for centuries toward the pleasant, benign sun that had always set over the Middle Kingdom, over the yellow tiles of the Forbidden City and the golden tints of Beijing’s loess foothills, Koreans turned around to face an ascendant country strong and determined enough to take its measure, for the first time in recorded history. Their subsequent aversion is perhaps explained by Nietzsche’s comment “When after a forceful attempt to gaze on the sun we turn away blinded, we see dark-colored spots before our eyes, as a cure.”
At the beginning of another century we can say that Koreans have by no means gotten over this experience. Japanese imperialism stuck a knife in old Korea and twisted it, and that wound has gnawed at the Korean national identity ever since. That is the fundamental reason why so little modern history “is written: and that is what so dignifies those few Koreans and Japanese who have stood outside this death urge toward silence and written good history anyway.
Why should Japan and Korea have a shared modern history so daunting and unnerving? It is because their relationship is more akin to that between Germany and France or England and Ireland than to that between Belgium and Zaire or Portugal and Mozambique. Colonialism is often thought to have created new nations where none existed before, drawn new boundaries and brought diverse tribes and peoples together, out of a welter of geographic units divided along ethnic, racial, religious, or tribal lines. But, as we have seen, all of this existed in Korea for centuries before 1910. Korea had ethnic and linguistic unity and long-recognized national boundaries well before the peoples of Europe attained them. Furthermore, by virtue of their relative proximity to China, Koreans had always felt superior to Japan at best, or equal at worst.” Excerpt From: Bruce Cumings. “Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History |
The Solar System. A more gravitational sense of things in East Asia | birthplace of the three body problem | the psyche is orbitalised | like how Indonesia is an oblitera of cosmic islands
A BATTLE OF THE MIND || Monica Kim writes of how brainwashing was invented during the Korean War | Brainwashing is Solar
Excerpt From: Bruce Cumings. “Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History
It’s very probable that 40,000 Bergamaschi in the stands of San Siro, all together, exchanged the virus between them. As is possible that so many Bergamaschi that night got together in houses, bars to watch the match and did the same. I’m sure that 40,000 people hugging and kissing each other while standing a centimeter apart — four times, because Atalanta scored four goals (the final result was 4-1) — was definitely a huge accelerator for contagion,” said Luca Lorini, the head of the intensive care unit at the Pope John XXIII hospital in Bergamo.
four goals silently sweeping stands
cheltenham our bomb?
Russian ships tracking in North Sea and English Channel yesterday, part of wider Arctic/Barents strategy – look at the Russian flag planted on the Arctic sea floor – red base, red as the Eurasian continent, blue, the frozen ocean above the Russian heartland, white, the melting caps, the opening – UK is a former maritime power fixated on a mental map of itself in relation to Europe, the downward view – channel blue – after V it should re-focus on what’s unfolding in its northern penumbral, the Northern Corridor opening, new maritime oceanic links, London (remember the rotating webcam of, needs to re-ventilate, away from its financialised, de-realised life support towards real economy – re-emergence of geography, engineering, maritime manufacturing – Arctic think tank that wants the Arctic Ocean renamed the Russian Ocean, the way analysts think of the South China Sea as a Chinese lake, new ice curtain – would be interesting to explore dyad between the Arctic cold blue and the cold blue satellite space – this vertical dyad is significant… think of a video of Mahan… against Mackinder… ocean thesis…heartland thesis… new space race intersects an Arctic race… how will dominance in new technologies of 4th industrial revolution interlace these two fates breathing about the northern edges of London dreams. In a way that the call for movement away from financialised model to real economy model (see G Blakeley et al) redevelopment of northern powerhouse must go further, into the penumbral blue oceans above United Kingdom, we vacated geography a long time ago, with our empire, no one goes into geographical IR jobs anymore majority is creamed off into city… but ned new engine, new impetus to the maritime game, the northern chessboard of meltice afoot. In a way all coming into consciousness at times of V, how the dyads grow more intimate, between places, with isolation, with the slowdown, the expanse doesn’t shrink, counter-intuitively the world becoming larger as it grows more intimate…the way a relationship evolves… the Northern Powerhouse must fold out into the ocean… reminded finally of the two colours of blue that the Russian language delineates between a light blue and a dark blue… the latter is oceanic, a freight liner, the slow build up of military naval assets, the former is the sky bound, aerial dimension, a fighter jet… jointedness in naval and aerial operations in the North Sea and Barents… return to Mahan and Mackinder dyad idea, interlink it with webcam video of rotating London, Channel blue is the hour when things delaminate after work, but also the ignorance to the world changing about the penumbral regions of your skull, after Suez, after Big Bang, vacating the oceanic for the silicate high towers of finance, but Canary Wharf is an island, we forget, all islands and forces aglance closing in on the horizon.
In Deep Freeze: The Arctic’s Role on The Asia Chessboard (https://www.csis.org/analysis/deep-freeze-arctics-role-asia-chessboard-heather-conley), Conley:
Russia is an Arctic superpower and we have documented this in an earlier report, which we called the new ice curtain. To think about it really, Russia’s survival is now based on the Arctic, its future economic survival of energy resources. Over 22% of current Russian GDP originates from the Arctic. They have a more broadly defined geographical-spanse that we would consider sub-Arctic as well. And clearly Russia, about a decade, 13 years ago, made a significant change and began to rebuild their military posture in the Arctic. Now understanding it had collapsed at the end of the Cold War, but they began to reconstitute it. […] the Russian air force is causing the Japanese air force to scramble more. Yes, they’re spoilers in the Korea peninsula, but they’re not a major power in the great game in the Pacific. […] Now that China is sending more significant surface vessels, now there are LNG carriers, there are icebreakers, there are scientific container ships. This is going to be increasingly needs to be a focus of INDOPACOM because we’re going to see Chinese maritime traffic, potentially with escorts going through the narrow Bering Straits to the Russian Arctic, because the Chinese are investing a great deal in the Yamal, liquefied natural gas plants.
Land Power v Sea Power. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0007kk3
What if we look at this from a different angle? What if we look at it from the moon? Imagine for a moment that it’s the dead of winter and you’re standing in your spacesuit and your weighted boots in the lunar dust looking out through your visor at the earth. From up here a Victorian geographer has something to show you: “at mid-winter as seen from the moon, a vast white shield would reveal the heartland in its widest meaning” [Phil Tinline: so the heartland as defined by Halford Mackinder is broadly what we see as Central Asia, Mongolia and Russia on today’s map, that part of Europe and Asia that is inaccessible to attack from naval power […] 02:08 [Charles Kupchan]: during the 1990s and the war on terror there was little emphasis in the U.S. on geopolitics but now that is changing – if you read the Trump administration’s national security strategy it essentially says we are going to demote counter-terrorism in the Middle East, in the grand strategy playbook and we are elevating great power rivalry in particular vs China and Russia, which sets a stage for a world in which land power vs sea power, Heartland vs Rimland is coming back.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxzvNYT-17mjYJMuDzGx7AA – Australian National University
– https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/medcalf-r
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zoBOsQtCBo – Australian Indo-Pacific horizon very prominent
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD506yORW2voSanqEgLOUIQ/videos\
https://www.csis.org/analysis/great-power-competition
THE FADING OF THE UNIPOLAR MOMENT
x POLAR INERTIA
“Many observers have concluded that the post-Cold War era of international relations – which began in the early 1990s and is sometimes referred to as the unipolar moment (with the United States as the unipolar power) – began to fade in 2006 – 2008, and that by 2014, the international environment has shifted to a fundamentally different situation of renewed great power competition with China and Russia and challenges by these two countries and others to elements of the U.S.-led International order that has operated since World War II. “
The fading of the unipolar moment. A major depressive episode is characterized by the presence of a severely depressed mood that persists for at least two weeks.[23] Episodes may be isolated or recurrent and are categorized as mild (few symptoms in excess of minimum criteria), moderate, or severe (marked impact on social or occupational functioning). An episode with psychotic features—commonly referred to as psychotic depression—is automatically rated as severe.[115] If the patient has had an episode of mania or markedly elevated mood, a diagnosis of bipolar disorder is made instead. Depression without mania is sometimes referred to as unipolar because the mood remains at one emotional state or “pole”.[116]
DSM-IV-TR excludes cases where the symptoms are a result of bereavement, although it is possible for normal bereavement to evolve into a depressive episode if the mood persists and the characteristic features of a major depressive episode develop.[117] The criteria were criticized because they do not take into account any other aspects of the personal and social context in which depression can occur.[118] In addition, some studies have found little empirical support for the DSM-IV cut-off criteria, indicating they are a diagnostic convention imposed on a continuum of depressive symptoms of varying severity and duration.[119]Bereavement is no longer an exclusion criterion in DSM-5, and it is now up to the clinician to distinguish between normal reactions to a loss and MDD. Excluded are a range of related diagnoses, including dysthymia, which involves a chronic but milder mood disturbance;[120] recurrent brief depression, consisting of briefer depressive episodes;[121][122] minor depressive disorder, whereby only some symptoms of major depression are present;[123] and adjustment disorder with depressed mood, which denotes low mood resulting from a psychological response to an identifiable event or stressor.[124] Three new depressive disorders were added to the DSM-5: disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, classified by significant childhood irritability and tantrums,[125] premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), causing periods of anxiety, depression, or irritability in the week or two before a woman’s menstruation,[126] and persistent depressive disorder.[115]
Lithium appears effective at lowering the risk of suicide in those with bipolar disorder and unipolar depression to nearly the same levels as the general population.[212]There is a narrow range of effective and safe dosages of lithium thus close monitoring may be needed.[213] Low-dose thyroid hormone may be added to existing antidepressants to treat persistent depression symptoms in people who have tried multiple courses of medication.[214] Limited evidence suggests stimulants, such as amphetamine and modafinil, may be effective in the short term, or as adjuvant therapy.[215][216] Also, it is suggested that folate supplements may have a role in depression management.
Polarity in international relations is any of the various ways in which power is distributed within the international system. It describes the nature of the international system at any given period of time. One generally distinguishes three types of systems: unipolarity, bipolarity, and multipolarity for four or more centers of power.[1] The type of system is completely dependent on the distribution of power and influence of states in a region or globally.
It is widely believed amongst theorists in international relations that the post-Cold War international system is unipolar: The United States’ defense spending is “close to half of global military expenditures; a blue-water navy superior to all others combined; a chance at a powerful nuclear first strike over its erstwhile foe, Russia; a defense research and development budget that is 80 percent of the total defense expenditures of its most obvious future competitor, China; and unmatched global power-projection capabilities.”
an opioid rustbelt in lithium blue sunset
boris + matt have it
Copyright claim over: Title: O Ignis Spiritus Artist: Hildegard von Bingen, David James, Jan Garbarek, Rogers Covey-Crump, John Potter, Gordon Jones Source: Mnemosyne, Jan Garbarek, The Hilliard Ensemble (Release date: 12.04.1999) License: © UMG on Behalf of EMC Records ECM 1700/01 Disclaimer: All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them. Use is strictly intended for non-commercial educational purposes. Corrected since. 01.04
25 March 2020, London || “With the crowds gone the city is abandoned to its images, empty, lonely and beautiful in a way, beautifully forlorn. Words dangling in the sky, words as images, a fragmented language that’s totally familiar to everyone, that doesn’t need translating into Japanese or Spanish, brand names, jingles, slogans, news flashes, every kind of message to gather against the fear and loneliness of city life. It’s all language (Mao II, Don Delillo)
15 July 2011, New York || Underworld by Delillo, “whose original cover, unnervingly, features an image of the World Trade Center towers surrounded by fog and looming over a small church, focuses on the cold war years. But its portrait of life under the shadow of the atomic bomb — this thing “they had brought” into the world that “out-imagined the mind” — is immediately recognizable. DeLillo depicts an America in thrall to celebrity, technology and the mass media, a country afflicted with paranoia and confusion, a country in which there are no limits to the power of money, and “violence is easier now, it’s uprooted, out of control, it has no measure anymore.” Though “Underworld” pivots around the experiences of one Nick Shay, it unfolds into a panoramic portrait of America, charting the intersecting lives of dozens of characters. The novel moves from the streets of New York to the suburbs to the New Mexico desert, cutting back and forth from the 1950s to the 1990s, and in doing so gives us a visceral sense of how private lives and public events, the personal and the collective, can converge, with explosive force – https://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/15/books/don-delillos-underworld-still-holds-power.html
1944, London, Slothrop’s || Ruins he goes daily to look in are each a sermon on vanity. That he finds, as weeks wear on, no least fragment of any rocket, preaches how indivisible is the act of death . . . Slothrop’s Progress: London the secular city instructs him: turn any corner and he can find himself inside a parable. [ ] are leaning on their roof-ledge, a magnificent sunset across and up the winding river, the imperial serpent, crowds of factories, flats, parks, smoky spires and gables, incandescent sky casting downward across the miles of deep streets and roofs cluttering and sinuous river Thames a drastic stain of burnt orange to remind a visitor of his mortal transience here, to seal or empty all the doors and windows in sight to his eyes that look only for a bit of company, a word or two in the street before he goes up to the soap-heavy smell of the rented room and the squares of coral sunset on the floorboards—an antique light, self-absorbed, fuel consumed in the metered winter holocaust, the more distant shapes among the threads or sheets of smoke now perfect ash ruins of themselves, nearer windows, struck a moment by the sun, not reflecting at all but containing the same destroying light, this intense fading in which there is no promise of return, light that rusts the government cars at the curbsides, varnishes the last faces hurrying past the shops in the cold as if a vast siren had finally sounded, light that makes chilled untraveled canals of many streets, and that fills with the starlings of London, converging by millions to hazy stone pedestals, to emptying squares and a great collective sleep. They flow in rings, concentric rings, on the radar screens. The operators call them “angels.” p 29 & 167 (Gravity’s Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon)
25 March 2020 18:43:07 || the spire beneath the canary. “whose [ ] unnervingly, features an image of the [ ] towers surrounded by fog and looming over a small church, focuses on the [ V ] years. But its portrait of life under the shadow of the virus — this thing “they had brought” into the world that “out-imagined the mind” — is immediately — is immediately — is immediately __ Video Credits London Live City Tour New: London Live London Panoramic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH-O4gTnsqs Coronavirus Data Live: Real Time Updates, Counter Time Trends, Map, Latest Coverage (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e51j0vKKpkw&feature=emb_title) LCY – LIN – Alitalia Embraer e190 Arrival – Full HD (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxY5wmp-aRI) The View from the Shard – East (https://www.theviewfromtheshard.com/east-view/) 25-02-2019 KL990 Takeoff from London City Airport (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIPFIjJuNlo) Excerpt from Don DeLillo: The Word, The Image, The Gun, Produced by BBC, 1991
___
He is inside the control room staring out at a city that is diaphanous, vague, contoured outside the plane, with sunrise coming up over the north sea, folding in over the docklands and the canary, passing into a strange shadowland
___
He’s sat staring at nothing – four screens – tracking charts, prices, yields – his skin mildly cooled against the redness of midday meetings burning out into blue evening. He watches the city passing in a dysplasia of lights, absenting from the market numbers dropping red in contagion, on work colleague dreams – against the desk – hard. – when he leaves One Canada Square passing down into the DLR rail lines, noticing the catheter of a small old man carried on a neck of tarpaulin staring at the tracks – and he sees the impulse, the impulse –
__
What kind of world do you want – after this?
After this?
After the divorce?
After the divorce – the divorce of the sky from the ground, the social amnesia, the distancing – maybe we won’t know how to touch after this. It’s the commencement
The commencement?
the commencement of social death
in the thrall of life
She prescribes a repeat of lithium pills to calm the tension in her brain,
outside the room, peering in, another sunset commences, plunging out of one hemisphere – a cascade of
nuclear explosions in its corona that register here in the small drab office aside the river, on the carpet as mute, minute slits, she’s crying again – only wants to feel, to feel.
___
Drafted in to the Excel Centre – in a wedge aside Canary Wharf and London City Airport – 4,000 patients in two wards of 2,000 beds each, he’s drilling the side panels – stop the spread of the virus between beds – doing his part for the nurses – at lunch, hi-vis jackets stretch across the dock-edge – you know it’s where they film Eastenders – Opening credits here, this curve of the river.
19.01.1917 | 18:52
A fire breaks out in the melt-pot room of Silvertown munitions factory and they’re sprinting, sprinting into oblivion, racing buckets of holy thames water like monks in the night into the ember zone – when 50 tonnes ignite across their eyeballs – in a gods flash, and Jackie will be widowed, of 50 long tons (50 t) of TNT igniting at 6:52 pm, 8 minutes short of the church bells, lighting in an instant a line of TNT in railway goods wagons, strafing the docks with red-hot chunks of rubble, into secondary fires, becoming fire – the gasometer, the gasholder in Greenwich Peninsula screaming out a fireball of 200,000cubic metres of gas into the sky. The explosion blows the glass out of windows in the Savoy Hotel, leading a lady to spill a cup of tea upon her thigh, half overturns a taxi in Pall Mall, London. And they gather to watch the fires from Maidstone and Guildford, a fisherman hearing the blast 100 miles (160 km) away in Norfolk. Although the blast is heard at a great distance, it is not heard uniformly across the whole intermediate distance owing to atmospheric effects caused by refraction of the sound waves.
Jackie carries the faint record of those sound waves to her grave in 1936 – 3 years shy of the war that clears out the neighbourhood. And this – all before the atom, when the two blues split. Years later some time in the 1980s, Tilda Swinton cuts up a wedding dress in the asbestos-ridden mill-room of Millenium Mills, recorded on a handheld camea, Jackie’s own loss had she known, in 2001, Mark Knopfler writes Silvertown Blues,
On Silvertown Way, the cranes stand high Quiet and gray against the still of the sky They won’t quit and lay down though the action has died They watch the new game in town on the Blackwall side From the poisonous drains a vision appears New circle of cranes, a new reason to be here A big silver dome rising up into the dawn Above the church and the homes were all the silver is gone If I’d a bucket of gold, what would I do I’d leave the story untold Silvertown blues Going down Silvertown Down in Silverdown Going down Silvertown Down in Silverdown A silver dawn steals over the docks A truck with no weels up on cinderblocks Men with no dreams around a fire in a drum Scrap metal schemes are rusted over and done If I’d a bucket of gold, silver would do I’d leave the story untold Silvertown blues Going down Silvertown Down in Silverdown Going down Silvertown Down in Silverdown When you’re standing on thin and dangerous ice You can knock and walk in for citizens’ advice They’ll tell you the where you can turn, where you can go There’s nothing they can tell me I don’t already know If I’d a bucket of gold, silver would do I’d leave the story untold Silvertown blues Going down Silvertown Down in Silverdown Going down Silvertown Down in Silverdown From the Caning Town train I see a billboard high There’s a big silverplane raising up into the sky And I can make out the words ‘seven flights every day’ Says six of those birds are bound for JFK If I’d a bucket of gold, silver would do I’d leave the story untold Silvertown blues And I’m going down in Silvertown Down in Silverdown Going down Silvertown Down in Silverdown
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), which measures the functioning of major body systems, including the heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, blood and neurological system. Patients with high SOFA scores would be less likely to qualify.In a nuclear explosion there are 2 explosions, the first flash, and the deeper longer resonance. In Russian there are two colours for the colour blue, volubly and siniy, dark and light, the darks like that ocean naval operation, the lights that fighter jet, a sonic boom over Surrey… the long duration of a split second, in a sense with V, we are in the flash stage…and trying to discern the longer deeper resonance primed Shock and awe operates by this nuclear logic, 9/11 that birthed the war on terror by the logic too, all content primed in the flash, time is not a line but an intensive nuclear flash…a material resonance chroma, chroma, chrona, corona channel blue is complacency, ignorance but also fear, anxiety channel blue in South China Sea is fear of being locked in…hence the want for deep sea channel to breathe to let the submarines out. Nuclear subs in the arctic…the rotating ball…a continuity from Semey’s blast, from Kola…nuclear children of the atom…exaflop black racks in U.S. modelling an explosion, modelling time, modelling the degradation of arsenals, the change through time, the chromosoma, modelling the future as freight of I.
the two blip episode – the double flash – recorded by a satellite, the vela incident in Indian Ocean…chorioretinal burns of the V… liquidity haemmorhages…SOFA…sequential organ failure, film the sky above London again, SOFA… he watched webcams channel blue and imagined the flash of an atomic bomb, the way the sky lit up over North Korea…from Omsk, the distant rumble, the seismographs bending, the two colours blue, the deep rumble And on ventilators east in the docks of the munchen scream sets of lungs heaved…a mile away black data racks heaved…two traffics two data streams passing over…transmuting the sky under the river, tollhouse north two…excel centre nightingale. He thinks the world is speaking to him, the munchen docklands scream… the barrier… the contagion through the wormhole…then V arrived… he reads Libra…Oswald made ventilators… the thin barrier between paranoiac and delusion.. “[ ] used to believe that he could look at a plane in flight and make it explode in midair by simply thinking it. He believed, at thirteen, that the border between himself and the world was thin and porous enough to allow him to affect the course of events. An aircraft in flight was a provocation too strong to ignore. He’d watch a plane gaining altitude after taking off from Sky Harbor and he’d sense an element of catastrophe tacit in the very fact of a flying object filled with people. He was sensitive to the most incidental stimulus and he thought he could feel the object itself yearning to burst. All he had to do was wish the fiery image into his mind and the plane would ignite and shatter. His sister used to tell him, Go ahead, blow it up, let me see you take that plane out of the sky with all two hundred people aboard, and it scared him to hear someone talk this way and it scared her too because she wasn’t completely convinced he could not do it. It’s the special skill of an adolescent to imagine the end of the world as an adjunct to his own discontent. But Jeff got older and lost interest and conviction. He lost the paradoxical gift for being separate and alone and yet intimately connected, mind-wired to distant things.” (Delillo) What is etymology of blueprint? Huxley’s Brave New World, Orwell’s 1984 both on dawn of WWII – both preemptions, stacks of thousands of urns outside funeral homes in Hubei province. What is etymology of blueprint? Elements of Chinese political culture exiting traditional bounds – Gove’s ‘reckoning’ – jury by international in wake of V-stream || physical borders closed, dilation – but the mental borders have all converged into the slipstream of the V-rocket. || sequential Kessler, Rashomon effects taking hold.
Colin Beattie S5M-02976 | Industrial Strategy for a More Prosperous, Fairer Britain
That the Parliament notes the publication of the report, Industrial Strategy for a more prosperous, fairer Britain, in August 2016 by the Industrial Communities Alliance; considers that the strategy is a significant step forward in providing a context for debate that acknowledges the demise of Scotland’s industrial base where whole sectors, including coal, steel, textiles, shipbuilding and heavy engineering, have disappeared entirely or have been reduced to a shadow of their former selves; regrets the impact on communities in Midlothian and across Scotland, which it considers have been left behind and now often have to get by on low-paid work in call centres or warehousing, or on benefits as a main source to top up income; considers that a revival of British industry would be especially beneficial to the economies of the Midlands, the north of England, Wales and Scotland; believes that the adoption of an effective industrial strategy would enhance competitiveness and help deliver a high-wage, high-employment economy, and notes the views that the industrial strategy document, with its focus on the economy, manufacturing, trade, procurement, finance, business support, skills, infrastructure, energy costs and research and development, would benefit from a Scottish dimension, with the aim of finding a consensus on how to best address what it considers are significant issues within communities and agreeing on a progressive and sustainable way forward.
The Northern Powerhouse: One Agenda, One Economy, One North (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/427339/the-northern-powerhouse-tagged.pdf) The phrase ‘The Northern Powerhouse’ has seen off three chancellors and two prime ministers, but still doubts remain about the sincerity of the government’s intention to redress the imbalances between London and the north of England. Initiatives have had mixed success, but with the Conservative Party’s victory in the north at the last election and increased investment promises within chancellor Rishi Sunak’s first budget, is now the time to invest in the region? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFWHnw6MDtw – Maritime Nation is a campaign to raise awareness of the vital contribution of the UK marine and maritime sector. The campaign builds on three key principles:
Revitalize The Old Northeast Industrial Bases (simplified Chinese: 振兴东北老工业基地; traditional Chinese: 振興東北老工業基地; pinyin: Zhènxīng Dōngběi Lǎo Gōngyè Jīdì), also Revitalize Northeast China or Northeast China Revitalization, is a policy adopted by the People’s Republic of China to rejuvenate industrial bases in Northeast China. The areas targeted once functioned as the center of heavy industry in China, first under Japanese-occupation and then under the state-led development of the People’s Republic of China. Since the 1980s, the region has been heavily affected by the restructuring of the Chinese economy and the closing and consolidation of many heavy industry State-owned enterprises (SOEs).[1] It covers three provinces: Heilongjiang, Jilin, and Liaoning, collectively referred to as Dongbei, as well as the five eastern prefectures of Inner Mongolia: Xilin Gol, Chifeng, Tongliao, Hinggan and Hulunbuir.[2]
Premier Wen Jiabao held a State Council meeting on 10 September 2003 regarding the issue of reviving northeast China. The meeting saw the drafting of the document “Certain Opinions Regarding Implementing the Strategies of Reviving the Old Industrial Bases Including the Northeast”, which would be jointly disseminated by the Central Committee of the CCP and the State Council in October 2003.[3] The State Council established a special Leading Group to define and adopt related strategies, which held its first meeting in August 2009 and the second in August 2010. The Chairman of the Leading Group is Premier Wen Jiabao.
Following the first meeting of the Leading Group, the revitalization strategy was affirmed and extended in a document of September 9, 2009. The State Council asked the Northeastern provinces to better coordinate their economic development strategies.[4] As a result, the top party and government leaders of Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang and Inner Mongolia met in Shenyang, capital of Liaoning for the first Northeast Summit in April 2010, and signed a framework agreement of 25 articles for cooperation and integrated regional development The core of the program is to revitalize the region’s traditional industry, while speeding up development in aspects of structural regulation, regional cooperation, economic reform, the construction of an environment-friendly economy, and increased efforts in education, healthcare, and cultural projects. In 2016, it was announced that 1.6 trillion RMB would be used to continue to revitalize the economy. Cooperation with Russia, the two Koreas and Mongolia, as well as securing natural gas supplies will become important factors in this revitalisation program.
Background Video: RR7235B NORTH SEA OIL BONANZA FOR BRITAIN In 1972 Britain was on the brink of an oil bonanza that could halve her dependence on foreign supplies by 1980. This was the implication behind the discovery in the North Sea of a second major oilfield, Brent, 100 miles north-east of the Shetland Islands. Getting the oil out will be difficult and costly. Huge new production rigs, standing 700 feet from the sea-bed, will have to be used to pump the oil along a pipeline that will cost up to a million pounds a mile to build. The new strike will also ensure that Aberdeen, a modest fishing town on Scotland’s north-east coast, will now become the oil capital of Britain. The town’s character is already visibly changing as the oil men and a host of ancilliary industries move in.
The Novaya Zemlya effect is a polar mirage caused by high refraction of sunlight between atmospheric thermal layers. The effect will give the impression that the sun is rising earlier than it actually should, and depending on the meteorological situation, the effect will present the Sun as a line or a square—sometimes referred to as the rectangular sun—made up of flattened hourglass shapes. The mirage requires rays of sunlight to travel through an inversion layer for hundreds of kilometres, and depends on the inversion layer’s temperature gradient. The sunlight must bend to the Earth’s curvature at least 400 kilometres (250 mi) to allow an elevation rise of 5° for sight of the solar disk. The first person to record the phenomenon was Gerrit de Veer, a member of Willem Barentsz‘s ill-fated third expedition into the north polar region in 1596–1597. Trapped by the ice, the party was forced to stay for the winter in a makeshift lodge on the archipelago of Novaya Zemlya and endure the polar night. Apart from the image of the Sun, the effect can also elevate the image of other objects above the horizon, such as coastlines which are normally invisible due to their distance. After studying the Saga of Erik the Red, Waldemar Lehn concluded that the effect may have aided the Vikings in their discovery of Iceland and Greenland, which are not visible from the mainland under normal atmospheric conditions.[4]
In 1943, during the Second World War, Novaya Zemlya briefly served as a secret seaplane base for Nazi Germany‘s Kriegsmarine, to provide German surveillance of Allied shipping en route to Siberia. The seaplane base was established by U-255 and U-711, which were operating along the northern coast of Soviet Russia as part of 13th U-boat Flotilla. Seaplane sorties were flown in August and September 1943. 1963 saw the implementation of the Limited Test Ban Treaty which banned most atmospheric nuclear tests.[27] The largest underground test in Novaya Zemlya took place on September 12, 1973, involving four nuclear devices of 4.2 megatons total yield. Although far smaller in blast power than the Tsar Bomba and other atmospheric tests, the confinement of the blasts underground led to pressures rivaling natural earthquakes. In the case of the September 12, 1973 test, a seismic magnitude of 6.97 on the Richter Scale was reached, setting off an 80 million ton avalanche that blocked two glacial streams and created a lake 2 kilometres (1.2 mi) in length.[27] Over its history as a nuclear test site, Novaya Zemlya hosted 224 nuclear detonations with a total explosive energy equivalent to 265 megatons of TNT.[25] For comparison, all explosives used in World War II, including the detonations of two US nuclear bombs, amounted to only two megatons.[27] In 1988–1989, glasnost helped make the Novaya Zemlya testing activities public knowledge,[25] and in 1990 Greenpeace activists staged a protest at the site.[28] The last nuclear test explosion was in 1990 (also the last for the entire Soviet Union and Russia). The Ministry for Atomic Energy has performed a series of subcritical underwater nuclear experiments near Matochkin Shar each autumn since 1998.[29] These tests reportedly involve up to 100 grams (3.5 oz) of weapons-grade plutonium.[30] In October 2012, it was reported that Russia would resume subcritical nuclear testing at “Zone B”. In Spring 2013, construction of what would become a new tunnel and four buildings[31] was initiated near the Severny settlement, 3 km west-northwest to the Mount Lazarev.[32][33]
The Soviet RDS-202 hydrogen bomb (code name Ivan[3] or Vanya), known by Western nations as Tsar Bomba (Russian: Царь-бо́мба, tr. Tsar’-bómba, IPA: [t͡sarʲ ˈbombə], lit. ‘Tsar bomb’), was the most powerful nuclear weapon ever created. Tested on 30 October 1961 as an experimental verification of calculation principles and multi-stage thermonuclear weapon designs, it also remains the most powerful human-made explosive ever detonated.
The bomb was detonated at the Sukhoy Nos (“Dry Nose”) cape of Severny Island, Novaya Zemlya, 15 km (9.3 mi) from Mityushikha Bay, north of Matochkin Strait.[4][5][6] The detonation was secret but was detected by US Intelligence agencies. The US apparently had an instrumented KC-135R aircraft (Operation SpeedLight[7]) in the area of the test – close enough to have been scorched by the blast. The bomb was attached to an 800-kilogram.
Taking off from the Olenya airfield in the Kola Peninsula, the release plane was accompanied by a Tu-16 observer plane that took air samples and filmed the test. Both aircraft were painted with the special reflective paint to minimize heat damage. Despite this effort, Durnovtsev and his crew were given only a 50% chance of surviving the test.[10] The bomb, weighing 27 metric tons, was so large (8 metres [26 ft] long by 2.1 metres [6 ft 11 in] in diameter) that the Tu-95V had to have its bomb bay doors and fuselage fuel tanks removed[1] (it is also larger than what the original layouts would suggest). The bomb was attached to an 800-kilogram (1,800 lb), 1,600-square-metre (17,000 sq ft) parachute, which gave the release and observer planes time to fly about 45 kilometres (28 mi) away from ground zero, giving them a 50 percent chance of survival.[23] The bomb was released two hours after takeoff from a height of 10,500 m (34,500 ft) on a test target within Sukhoy Nos. The Tsar Bomba detonated at 11:32 (or 11:33) Moscow Time on 30 October 1961, over the Mityushikha Bay nuclear testing range (Sukhoy Nos Zone C), north of the Arctic Circle over the Novaya Zemlya archipelago in the Arctic Ocean, at a height of 4,200 m ASL (4000 m above the target)[4][22][25] (some sources suggest 3,900 m ASL and 3,700 m above target, or 4,500 m). By this time the Tu-95V had already escaped to 39 km (24 mi) away, and the Tu-16 53.5 km (33.2 mi) away. When detonation occurred, the shock wave caught up with the Tu-95V at a distance of 115 km (71 mi) and the Tu-16 at 205 km (127 mi). The Tu-95V dropped 1 kilometre (0.62 mi) in the air because of the shock wave but was able to recover and land safely.[10] According to initial data, the Tsar Bomba had a nuclear yield of 58.6 Mt (245 PJ) (significantly exceeding what the design itself would suggest) and was overestimated at values all the way up to 75 Mt (310 PJ). || about the penumbral, Dziadek in Bristol after the war but how Norway operations in WWII, heavy water, heavy sunset all tie it in to Novaya Zemlya, to Verbork – atomic children. His mother died in Biala Rawska in 1942.
Today’s NC3 system is a legacy of the Cold War, last comprehensively updated almost three decades ago. It includes interconnected elements composed of warning satellites and radars; communications satellites, aircraft, and ground stations; fixed and mobile command posts; and the control centers for nuclear systems.
YOU ARE WRITING UNDERWORLD II
Starting with Dziadek in the North Sea theatre…Norway…atom bomb…. Biala rawska…
The yinyang of the bomb, of the atom
Two complementary principles of Chinese philosophy:Yin is negative, dark, and feminine.Yang is positive, bright, and masculine. Their interaction is thought to maintain the harmony of the universe and to inluence everything within it. “Yin and Yang (in Chinese philosophy and religion): two principles, one negative, dark, and feminine (Yin), and one positive, bright, and masculine (Yang), whose interaction inluences the destinies of creatures and things.”As we see in these dictionary entries, things like the earth, the moon, water, the night, the feminine, softness, passivity, and darkness all accord with yin, whereas heaven, the sun, ire, day, masculinity, hardness, activity, and brightness can all be attributed to yang.
Why are we building railways through Eurasia? What about a hyperloop? Or Space X / Blue Origin craft pods taking off and landing a landscape dotted with 3D Printers, Digital codes for Build beamed down from the space dimension Blip.land the ephemerality of a recording… in a simulation of a nuclear explosion…. Rashomon – Kessler …. Then there is a colour schematic…. Blue … red… green … the bomb explodes in four dimensions…. But we see it in three…. Maybe you need to have a character who is watching a bomb explode…. And he is a synesthete…. He is feeling the pressure effects on the atmosphere etc. etc. as colours….
Where to extract, one needs to go up into space, and in order to go up, one must go down to build more satellite apparatuses out from extraction. Sean Cubitt refers to “geomedia” as an assemblage of earth-mediating operations that place time and value on a relational axis.13 Geomedia not only draws representations of moving lands and atmospheres, but predisposes certain ways of environments to form, and others to dissipate. Here, rare earth elements shift from solid mineral into liquid, digital circuits. Satellite images of territories feedback into their own transformation, with its cyclical loop perpetuated from the laborers who mine the minerals to the machines which transmit its reflective signature. The visualizing of land and air coincides with broader geopolitical events, where together they can be seen as redrawing much of the world’s organizational logics. By the early 1990s, with the immense production and export of China’s minerals, the price of rare earths on the global market had dropped to nearly one-quarter. Japan, France, and other nation states who previously held monopolies on the market were forced to implement production cuts, some even falling into bankruptcy.14 With europium (铕) emitting intense beams of red light from TV screens, yttrium (钇) being used in camera lenses, and mobile phones containing neodymium (钕), contemporary geopolitics are still defined by rare earth elements. Yet, following Jennifer Gabrys, “sensor-based technologies are not only environmentally located; they also inform and ‘program’ environments, have environmental impacts, and take hold in particular environments, whether for managing or monitoring processes.”15 The Digital Belt and Road is no exception, acting as enablers of grand infrastructural projects, through and from within geomedia, with “data-poor” countries as prime frontiers.
https://thediplomat.com/2020/04/blue-dot-network-the-belt-and-road-alternative/ – ‘the three governments have been at pains to say that the Blue Dot Network is not a response to China’s Belt and Road Initiative. However, cynics have argued that the choice of ‘blue’ in the initiative’s name was not an accident: a clear contrast to the “red” of BRI. As we said in our recent CSIS commentary, the United States and its allies cannot and should not try to compete with China over every infrastructure project in the world. Washington will never spend the kind of money that Beijing says it intends to through BRI. But the United States also has a commercial and strategic interest in promoting infrastructure around the world, and it brings unique assets to this effort. These include innovative companies, technical expertise, rule of law and trillions of dollars of pension and insurance funds looking for long term returns.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/why-china-ill-equipped-great-power-rivalry/609364/ – Why the U.S. will outcompete China: the faith in autocratic ascendance and democratic decline is contrary to historical fact.
https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opinion/article/3078018/coronavirus-has-lit-fuse-time-bomb-chinas-economy-debt – Coronavirus has lit the fuse of a bomb in China’s economy: debt. (Cary Huang) – Beijing has a tough choice to make: tolerate an unprecedented hit to the economy or go to massive stimulus and risk explosive consequences. It should beware, a financial virus can be every bit as toxic as a biological one.
He loves the bomb.
Dreaming the nuclear explosion in the lung…
The Radical decoupling of the atom….
The Radical decoupling of the Sino-American dyad…
Nuclear inertia
V
We like stories, we like to summarize, and we like to simplify, i.e., to reduce the dimension of matters. The narrative fallacy addresses our limited ability to look at sequences of facts without weaving an explanation into them, or, equivalently, forcing a logical link, an arrow of relationship, upon them. Explanations bind facts together. They make them all the more easily remembered; they help them make more sense. Where this propensity can go wrong is when it increases our impression of understanding. Our tendency to perceive—to impose—narrativity and causality are symptoms of the same disease—dimension reduction. Moreover, like causality, narrativity has a chronological dimension and leads to the perception of the flow of time. Causality makes time flow in a single direction, and so does narrativity.
They discussed the discovery of fission in the student union restaurant, the Heartland Page 168 Oppenheimer.
Expand the Golden triangle of biotech, after all this…why shouldn’t the UK become a pandemic specialist / life science export hub… Two outcomes of WWII…radar and the atom bomb… Oppenheimer was the Coordinator of Rapid Rupture
There is another atomic pulse in society – systemically important financial institutions – SIFI – the oligopoly at the heartland of it all. The bomb is trying to call out to histor…trying to momentalise something…radicalisation always from rich boys finding god….the bomb that intensive involution… The number of numbers is infinite…she replies that so is the number of revolutions, there can be no final revolution, one imagines how sweetly this fell upon the ear of the Bolshevics was to root out and destory the slightest suspicion of a second…
The handle turns..
Nothing is final, the only reality is change…The point of time wrought only by ambient years…the odyssey
They’re converging – events, dates, times – Bill Gates, we all look back now, at the prophecy – the nuclear mushroom cloud transforming to a subatomic virus, a solar corona in the blood vessel, in the lungs.
Nuclear inertia.
Bill wheels out a large barrel. April 03 2015.
“When I was a kid the disaster we worried about most was a nuclear war. That’s why we had a barrel like this [he points to the barrel, scrawled in yellow: “Survival Supplies Furnished by Office of Civil Defense Department of Defense 17 1/2 gallons] filled with cans of food and water. When the nuclear attack came we were supposed to go downstairs, hunker down, and eat out of that barrel. Today the greatest risk of global catastrophe doesn’t look like this, instead it looks like this. If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s most likely to be a highly infectious virus, rather than a war, not missiles but microbes. Now part of the reason for this is we have invested a huge amount in nuclear deterrence, but we’ve actually invested very little in a system to stop an epidemic. We are not ready for the next epidemic.”
I was at the same time enthralled to the bomb. I’m researching why the Belt and Road is a child of the atom. Long stretch, will take time, when I came across this, from Trinity, the first atomic explosion:
The bomb explodes in four dimensions.
September 2020 06:58am
Radical decoupling.
Trump confront Xi Jinping in an incendiary.
How the coronavirus outbreak is like a nuclear attack: an interview with Jeffrey Lewis (Jeffrey Lewis, John Krzyzaniak, March 20, 2020)
In 2018, arms control expert Jeffrey Lewis published a book titled The 2020 Commission Report on the North Korean Nuclear Attacks Against the United States: A Speculative Novel. As the title suggests, it’s a fictitious account, written in the style of a retrospective government report, of a nuclear attack on the continental United States.
Lewis describes the pandemic as a “nuclear war in slow motion” and says that effectively managing both types of crises requires a cooperative, internationalist approach.
a pandemic is just a kind of nuclear war in slow motion. Preventing nuclear war and managing a pandemic require the same conceptual approach.
JK: We will probably have many weeks and months ahead, while we’re all trapped in our homes, to dwell on the lessons learned, and whether certain lessons could be applied to nuclear command and control. But from an academic perspective, have you learned any lessons for your work in the nuclear field?
JL: One thing about nuclear command and control, which the virus outbreak underscores, is that it is so hard to get good information in a crisis. The epidemic spiraled out of control so quickly in certain countries that even the best experts were rushing to figure out what was going on. To me the danger of a nuclear war is not that somebody’s going to get up one morning and say, “Ah, fuck it,” and push the button. It’s that we’re deeply flawed as human beings, and we have imperfect information, and we’re always trying to make decisions under complexity. And I think you saw the same things here. There was enough uncertainty early on that people could argue about how contagious the virus is, or how deadly it is. That uncertainty hampered the response at a critical moment.
The Archbishop of Canterbury has likened the coronavirus pandemic to a nuclear explosion, the fallout of which will last for years and shape the nation’s future in unforeseeable ways. Speaking at Westminster, the Most Rev Justin Welby welcomed the “war budget commitment” made by the Government to shore up the struggling economy. But the top Anglican cleric stressed the need for the “enormous and unprecedented” financial support to benefit the entire country and not just the big cities. “The crisis through which we are passing will change this nation in deep and unpredictable ways. “Like a nuclear explosion, the initial impact is colossal but the fallout last for years and will shape us in ways we can’t even begin to predict at the moment.”
January 14 2020 \ Lords Chamber (https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-01-14/debates/0A20EC42-B032-4D6F-8597-F32367AD73C6/NuclearWeapons) 3:01pm Asked by Lord Tunnicliffe
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the (1) management of, and (2) overspend on, the United Kingdom’s nuclear weapons programme.
July 16, 2019 || Nuclear Weapons (International Relations Committee Report) (Source)
That this House takes note of the Report from the International Relations Committee Rising nuclear risk, disarmament and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (7th Report, HL Paper 338)
There used to be a time when it was assumed that the international containment of nuclear weapons was in good hands, so that we could all confidently leave these matters to experts and diplomats, while getting on with more exciting and seemingly urgent matters such as Brexit, climate change or whatever Donald Trump is going to do next—but not any longer. The safe world, if one can call it that, of balanced nuclear deterrence where two sides are in mutual understanding about the catastrophic outcome of nuclear deployment has crumbled away, almost unnoticed by the world or by media busy on other issues. What seemed balanced has now become highly precarious; where there seemed progress, there is now stalemate. Some of the reasons for this are obvious and some much more obscure and complex: they lie in the deepest reaches of very advanced technology, with which Governments have barely caught up.
In this report, we have tried to throw light on some of the main influences changing the situation, including in particular the exponential growth of digital technological power. Meanwhile at the forefront, anyone who wishes to can see that at the international level rising tensions, ill will in place of goodwill and distrust in place of trust have grown, duly souring and paralysing the arms control dialogue. US-Russian contacts on these matters are now said to be less than they were even at the height of the Cold War; those two countries are still by far the biggest holders of nuclear warheads, by a factor of at least 10. The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty has been dropped by both sides, starting with outright Russian violation and, incidentally, ensuring that all Europe is now moving back into the missiles’ line of fire. The START I treaty is about to run out and there is no sign at all of renewal. Other treaties concerning fissile materials and the comprehensive test ban are stuck and still await entry into force. Both Russia and America are developing new missile vehicles and inflammatory rhetoric is flying around on all sides. The scene is complicated compared with the past, in that a third nuclear great-power force is now on the scene, namely China—officially and, to my mind, foolishly declared by America to be its enemy. Wisely, we do not see it that way ourselves.
Outside the big players, Iran is, predictably, ignoring the 2015 nuclear deal or Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as it is called, and speeding up uranium enrichment thanks to American rejection, while tensions now rise daily in the Arabian Gulf. We wait to see whether the European powers, including the UK, can rescue the Iran nuclear deal at this stage and whether the offered release of the Iranian oil tanker at Gibraltar will in any way ease the situation. Meanwhile Kim Jong-un carries on with his missile and nuclear programme, despite Mr Trump’s wooing efforts. Then there are the unofficial nuclear states, notably India and Pakistan, which carry on their bitter 70 year-old hostility.
However, the enormous technological impact on the nuclear scene is perhaps the newest and most unnerving danger. The committee was warned clearly about the vulnerabilities to nuclear command and control systems from cyberattacks. If cyberattacks can now knock out early warnings, simulate fake attacks or compromise delivery systems, the entire doctrine of nuclear deterrence is undermined. The Government’s response to our concerns on this was:
“We will work with Allies to review the implications”,
of “these new technologies”. Is that really enough? I am told that microchip processing speeds are now more than 240 million times—I repeat: 240 million—faster than they were in the Apollo 11 moon shot computer 50 years ago, which I think your Lordships will discuss later. We are now living in a completely different world from the one in which thinking on arms control was first developed.
At the core of the existing nuclear regime is the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, which is coming up to 50 years old and due for review next year. It has certainly done its work in containing the number of nuclear states, but it is not in good shape today. Some even fear that it is becoming obsolete. Trust is the key in keeping this treaty alive and effective: trust between the five nuclear powers it legitimises—the so-called P5—and trust between these five and all the non-nuclear signatories, in whose strong interest it is to stop further proliferation or, worse still, nuclear weapons getting to non-state and terrorist actors. The deal at the heart of the NPT is that the non-nuclear signatories will accept the disparity, provided that the five nuclear powers show a sustained path towards having fewer warheads, dismantling systems and having better verification methods to show that promises are being kept. Is this happening?
The non-nuclears think not, or not fast enough, and are getting impatient. As we report, many have banded together to agree to a straightforward ban or prohibition on all nuclear weapons—just like that. This so-called ban treaty has been endorsed by 122 countries but has not yet entered into force. It sounds splendid, of course, but the reasons why it will not work are equally obvious. Just wishing will not make it so. The tensions that keep nuclear weapons in place need to be wound down first; this can be done only step by patient step, and with the most advanced verification methods possible. The ban treaty will not help and may even hinder. On this latter point, our witnesses strongly disagreed with each other. The United Kingdom, along with the rest of the P5, definitely does not support a ban. We do not believe it is helpful.
In the meantime, we can do our best here in the UK by going for minimal critical deterrence, minimising warheads, keeping systems safe and, with the most modern controls, improving verification systems all the time and grinding away at the underlying antagonisms. This is broadly what the United Kingdom, for one, is doing. Our operational number of warheads is, I understand, now no more than 120.
This step-by-step approach necessitates unending attempts at engagement in dialogue, including with Russia despite its other hostile and unhelpful attitudes and actions. This also means having a lot of patience rather than just passing hopeful treaties that get us nowhere. Nevertheless, the ban treaty’s supporters have a point, or so the committee heard in evidence. We believe that exchange and discussion between the P5 and the non-nuclear signatories to the NPT should be intense, continuous and understanding. Meanwhile, the dangers remain and grow. In this report we have urged the Government, as they currently chair the nuclear powers’ P5, to put all possible energies into making a success of the NPT and consolidating the trust essential to hold it together
The wrong things will be learned. The wrong things will be learned. The wrong things will be learned.
he watches London
nuclear
and under:
the loss in the monitor
blue aprons
turning over
The strategy of hitting the epidemic hard and fast, then seeking to curtail further outbreaks over the longer term – ‘the hammer and the dance’, it has been called – is what has actually been achieved so far in China, South Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore. …He oscillates between draconian threats to cordon off New York State, New Jersey and Connecticut, and impatient demands that America ‘open up’ as soon as possible. Once again his inadequacies have been exposed. But deeper forces are at work. Heavy-hitting conservative voices and leading businessmen have pushed the president in this direction. The issue isn’t whether or not to pursue ‘herd immunity’. What prompts all the talk of alternative strategies is the sheer difficulty of imagining how the US can make a lockdown work, either economically or politically. Trying to fight the virus with lockdowns and social distancing painfully exposes America’s weaknesses [2019 White House Paper: Mitigating the Impact of Pandemic Influenza through Vaccine Innovation:https://www.whitehouse.gov./wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Mitigating-the-Impact-of-Pandemic-Influenza-through-Vaccine-Innovation.pdf – unheeded]
As with climate change, we are left praying for a deus ex machina in the form of a scientific breakthrough. And once the crisis is over? What then? How do we imagine the restart? Before he was forced to retreat, Trump evoked the image of churches filling at Easter. Will the world economy rise from the dead? Are we going to rely once more on the genius of modern logistics and the techniques of dollar-finance to stitch the world economy back together again? It will be harder than before. Any fantasy of convergence that we might have entertained after the ‘fall of communism’ has surely by now been dispelled. We will somehow have to patch together China’s one-party authoritarianism, Europe’s national welfarism and whatever it is the United States will be in the wake of this disaster. But in any case, for those of us in Europe and America these questions are premature. The worst is just beginning.
He loves the bomb. Goluboy, Siniy – the two Russian blues. what is to be done scrawled across his Leninine night, walls tinged with the interminable years, the double flash
In the first cry of a new born world. And he has the words on the tip of his tonguemorselled face, staring at blank Shard-east canvas London, memories listing from some eminence downlight: NI. NI. NI. Chantsmen, circling the primal sphere of nuclear inertia – eyeballing out of northsea. Solarine heartland thrown into schizoidenetic blues and reds and greys – inertia in receipt, inertia in deceit, inertia in lives lived dead as god bled behind the eyes – we live [sic] are dying in an old chaos of the sun. Sensing that they are all part of the same resonance pattern: A man leaving Canary under glimmer of dusklight, baton thrown to U.S. prime equity, hurled out of redmonitor into some ethereal light, tokyo television sky melding in prayer-blue dock water. And What would He Looking at Us glance in the flash before the roar, lisp the R get war, get information get machine, get third get fourth get fifth industrials, get heat circles dancing around the retina, get chorioretinal burns, get carbon, get heat, get communism, get red, get moon, get death. He would see children dancing, minute flecks on the retinal gauge of a whitelit world, arrestments against the general wave of spilt atomlight and deaf rate dissipating in the canvas, His One Immutable Secret leaving tremors in the soul register – Splitting Is Eternis; Fissionable Are You – commencing the infernal return to the cranial-uranial dance in the nuclear brainheart, light plunging out of one hemisphere, flooding the dark, primal regions of the other. So they danced in the midday sun, and cried as the rainlight fell out of Tokyo.
A modern brain and a primal brain. Your modern brain (frontal cortex) is responsible for problem solving, memory, language, judgement, impulse control, and reasoning. Your primal brain (hindbrain and medulla) is responsible for survival, drive, and instinct. When your primal brain is engaged (sympathetic response), your modern brain is not working much. When the primal brain turns off and the modern brain kicks into gear (parasympathetic response) rationality returns, bringing back clearer thinking.
Patient W.J. Patient W.J.[30] was the first patient to undergo a full corpus callosotomy in 1962, after experiencing fifteen years of convulsions resulting from grand mal seizures. In 1962 Bombs blew over Pacific Ocean. He was a World War II paratrooper who was injured at 30 years old during a bombing raid jump over the Netherlands, and again in a prison camp following his first injury. After returning home, he began to suffer from blackouts in which he would not remember what he was doing or where, and how or when he got there. At age 37, he suffered his first generalised convulsion. One of his worst episodes occurred in 1953, when he suffered a series of convulsions lasting for many days. During these convulsions, his left side would go numb and he would recover quickly, but after the series of convulsions, he never regained complete feeling on his left side. Before his surgery, both hemispheres functioned and interacted normally, his sensory and motor functions were normal aside from slight hypoesthesia, and he could correctly identify and understand visual stimuli presented to both sides of his visual field. During his surgery in 1962, his surgeons determined that no massa intermedia had developed, and he had undergone atrophy in the part of the right frontal lobe exposed during the procedure. His operation was a success, in that it led to decreases in the frequency and intensity of his seizures.
Splitting Is Eternis; Fissionable Are You.
It’s why you need this. Why you want this. Why you want to see the atmosphere come fire. Why you love the bomb. Because it is not between them and us but the two hemispheres of your soul born-over white-lit godly in the flash.
_____
People with failing eyesight, paradoxically, may become immersed in a hallucinatory visual world. Hallucinations can be brought on by a simple fever or even the act of waking or falling asleep, when people have visions ranging from luminous blobs of color to beautifully detailed faces or terrifying ogres. Those who are bereaved may receive comforting “visits” from the departed. In some conditions, hallucinations can lead to religious epiphanies or even the feeling of leaving one’s own body.
THE CHARACTER IN THE SHARD TOWER… RETINAL LESIONS FROM STARING INTO THE SUN… but he becomes a SEER, seeing London for what it is in diaphonous colours….
A washing machine…. The sky falling in…
The Paradoxical Brain focuses on the phenomenon whereby damage to the brain can actually result in enhancement of function, questioning the traditional belief that lesions or other negative effects on the brain will result in loss of function.
.
An unmanned aircraft that can patrol the top of the world for four days leads a growing list of Arctic-themed drone-engineering projects either planned or underway by Russian defense labs and aircraft manufacturers, state media reports.A recent report by TASS says the Advanced Research Foundation — essentially, Russia’s six-year-old counterpart to the Pentagon’s DARPA — is working to create materials, electronic components, engines, payloads, and efficient information collection and processing algorithms for use in the Arctic zone. The report also noted work on a drone that can fly for four straight days, as well as demonstrators for technologies that allow vertical and ultrashort takeoff and landing. The Russian government is also funding university-level research into UAVs that can operate in the harsh Arctic climate. Moscow’s growing interest in cold-weather drones reflects its strategic interest in an Arctic region that climate change is making more accessible but which remains a remote and harsh operating environment. (The challenges were underlined in the deadly January crash of a Tu-22M3 bomber near Murmansk.) Russia is hardly alone in this: as the region becomes more contested, many nations are seeking to beef up their existing militaries for its unique weather conditions. But it does appear to be taking the lead in efforts to develop ways to monitor and observe vast northern reaches via unmanned technologies. In December, the Kalashnikov Design Bureau announced the ZALA 421-08M and ZALA 421-16E drones for Arctic surveillance. Built to fly for up to 250 minutes in sub-zero temperatures, the drones carry a navigation system specially designed to work without GPS or its Russian equivalent GLONASS. Soon, this growing family of Arctic-proof UAVs will add another member. The Russian Helicopters Holding is currently conducting tests of the VRT300, a helicopter-style UAV intended to do reconnaissance or haul small cargo loads for either military or civil fleets in new northern sea routes. To provide stability in strong Arctic winds, the VRT300’s coaxial rotors rotate in opposite directions. Other drones may eventually be modified for Arctic service. A January test flight of the 20-ton Ohotnik long-range combat UAVnear Novosibirsk raised eyebrows because it took place in 10-degree Fahrenheit (-12° C) weather. The military-affiliated ZvezdaWeekly speculated that more Arctic testing may be on the way. Another potential Arctic UAV is the Triada tiltrotor, a vertical-takeoff, horizontal-landing aircraft that can fly from 80 to 160 kilometers in temperatures down to -58 Fahrenheit and observe and film objects out to five kilometers, ZvezdaWeekly wrote. Meanwhile, the Russian military is already practicing to use drones in Arctic conditions. Last month, the Guards Tank Army of the Western Military District trained with Eleron-3 and Orlan-10 UAVs at low winter temperatures. In December 2018, soldiers in the Central Military District used the Granat-4 UAV while training near Novosibirsk. Other regiments near Tuva, also in southern Siberia, were training with the Orlan-10 around the same time. https://teknologiradet.no/en/drones-in-the-arctic/ https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2019/01/photo-shows-venting-radioactivity-nuclear-bomb-tests-novaya-zemlya
Hot Drones of Middle East, Negarestani’s telluric grounds , fading out to Cold Drones of Arctic, shift afoot. || “they believe Mesopotamia and the whole Middle East is overclouded by some kind of fog of war which is peculiar to the near and Middle Eastern regions of Asia. That you must practice blindness, must dry out your lungs and return to dust in order to coalesce the reeking pit of the Middle East. The inhabitants of a village near Tell-Kuyunjik, which is believed to be the ancient site of Nineveh, told us that this arid foris the haze of Pazuzu, the searing mushroom cloud of Middle East. Schizophrenia comes with delirium (Jnun), the passion for terminal disease (which presupposes health), war-torn realms of organic survival, attacks, and increasing counter-attacks diagrammatically narrating their tireless, attritional engagement on a Draco-spiral which sometimes melts, sometimes evaporates, burns incompletely and blurs into particles instead of dissolving into nothingness…the Arctic melting about the cool long region of his mind… drawing out from the Middle Eastern heat into a new theatre of cold blue oesophagi lurched over the controls of some freeze-air drone, thinking: if Reza were to write this ocean dyad corridor astretch from the Korean peninsular to northsea, what would be its name, and what would be its telluros, LNG – a colourless, odourless liquid is natural gas that has been cooled to around -259 Fahrenheit, it occupies approximately 1/600th of the volume of natural gas at a temperature of 60 Fahrenheit. LNG may be transported, regasified, and then used as natural gas. The cold, or cryogenic, component of LNG can be sold or utilised separately from the regasified LNG. || The searing mushroom cloud of Middle East… and its Novaya Zemlyan equivalent… http://savepechora.ru/page.php?p=259 – “EDEY YA – THE EARTH OF OUR ANXIETY” 1 part, 2009.
50 five years ago the Soviet government decided to establish the main landfill in the Arctic archipelago of Novaya Zemlya for testing nuclear weapons. And up to now Edey Ya as the Nenets call Novaya Zemlya remains the most closed and secret object on the territory of our state. The brainchild of “the cold war”, “object-700”, “archipelago NZ” being today’s area of death still continues to frighten people. The nuclear shield of the country was “forged” on the Arctic lands for 40 years. For those purposes 3 underwater, 43 underground and 86 atmospheric explosions were set off on the lands of the Northern archipelago. And although there were two nuclear test sites in the USSR – Semipalatinsk (in Kazakhstan) and the “object-700” (just a step away from the Nenets district) – Novaya Zemlya took up 94% of the total power of all nuclear explosions on the territory of the Soviet Union during the “the cold war”. Such an enormous load was not known by any of the former and existing polygons of the world. There were 132 explosions during 40 years of the history of nuclear tests on Novaya Zemlya. Former beautiful cultural and historical monument was turned into an archipelago of death. DUTCHMEN CALLED IT THE LAND GIVING LIFE Many years ago the very name of this island meant life; it was that saving continent where tired travelers could find shelter from storms and ice hummocks of the Arctic. It was an island of salvation for many ships: Russian, Dutch, Norwegian, Danish, and English ones shipwrecked in the “severe milky ocean”. And every time Europeans, who came to this mysterious, majestic island, admired its beauty and wealth. There in those old times, according to the memoirs of Protopriest Peter Smirnov, there was the main Samoyed idol, called Vesako. It stood nobly surrounded by 20 stone statues being a keeper of these mysterious places. Nobody can say exactly for how many centuries this stone statue protected the island but in the XVIII century this sanctuary of the ancient Samoyeds was completely destroyed by the mission of Benjamin. Nevertheless the stone guri in human growth serving as a kind of beacons-landmarks for our distant ancestors, returning or leaving Novaya Zemlya remained the monuments of the first settlers of Edey Ya. The mysterious island sung in the works of Pisahov, in the canvases of the artist Borisov, Tyko Wylka, in the research manuscripts of Sedov and Rusanov, preserved monuments of later eras on its land for many decades. One of such an example is a memorial plate installed on the Oranskiye Islands of Novaya Zemlya in honor of the arrival of the Dutch expedition of Willem Barents in 1594. Probably no one will answer what its fate is today as well as the question where now the memorial cross and the astronomical point of the Sedov’s expedition are located. Novaya Zemlya was the homeland for many Nenets. Till now grandchildren and great-grandchildren of the compelled immigrants still consider this to be their native land. 104 families were removed from the island after making a decision to open a landfill. They were forever deprived of their homeland but even now living on Kolguyev, in Naryan-Mar or Krasny, the former newcomers yearn for their forever-lost Edey Ya. Eastern proverb says: “What trouble if you have lost freedom and honor! But there is nothing worse than a loss of Motherland!”. And as the Nenets poet Yuri Vella wrote about this: “To whom shall I, survived today, address my misfortune? Rivers, lakes and seas have been tortured.”
The Highway of the Atom subarctic mine on the far eastern shores of Great Bear Lake provided Canadian uranium for the bombs detonated over Japan in August 1945. However, a complete history of Canada’s involvement in the Manhattan Project and the development of the atomic bomb has been thwarted by restrictions on classified documents. The Highway of the Atom overcomes these restrictions in an innovative and unconventional history that assembles a narrative from fragments – interviews, indigenous stories, archives, and physical remains – while questioning whether it is possible to grasp the past by sifting through what remains. Uncovering the story of the radioactive ore’s route from mine to weapon of mass destruction, Peter van Wyck considers the legacy of this history for the Dene community and inquires into trauma, landscape, disaster, and memory. From the fur trade routes of the far North, to the deserts of New Mexico and wartime Japan, The Highway of the Atom weaves together crucial missing pieces about the beginning of the Atomic Age in startling and unexpected ways. Toronto filmmaker and director Peter Blow’s remarkable documentary, Village of Widows, tracks an instance of escape and confession. This extremely power- ful short film follows an ethical line of implication or flight from the Déné of Great Bear Lake, through Port Hope, Ontario, the Manhattan Project, to Hiroshima. The Déné continue to endure the loss of many to radiation-related sickness—attributable to their employ- ment (between 1932 and 1960) transporting radioactive ore (radium and uranium) from a mine site at Port Radium, Northwest Territories. This material was moved over a 2,500 km water route to the railhead in northern Alberta, where it was transported south to the refinery in Port Hope, Ontario, and then taken to the United States where it (together with ore from the Bel- gian Congo and Colorado) was made into the bombs (the Manhattan Project) that were detonated over Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In the wake of their history of traumatic loss, and within their ongoing suffering, the Déné reached the remarkable conclusion that they too were complicit in the bombing of Japan. Their ethical obliga- tion was to make an extraordinary visit to Hiroshima to tell the Japanese survivors that they were sorry, that they didn’t know, and that they too would commemorate the stunning loss of life. This history is set out as a problem of and for memory and landscape in my “The Highway of the Atom: Recollections along a Route,” Topia 7 (2002). Village of the Widows
[n.b.] In a nuclear explosion there are 2 explosions, the first flash, and the deeper longer resonance. In Russian there are two colours for the colour blue, volubly and siniy, dark and light, the darks like that ocean naval operation, the lights that fighter jet, sonic boom over Surrey… turns up the whirring Klockian bass, thought-thinks in a sense with V, we are in the flash stage…and trying to discern the longer deeper resonance primed Shock and awe operates by this nuclear logic, 9/11 that birthed the war on terror by the logic too, all content primed in the flash, time is not a line but an intensive nuclear flash…a material resonance chroma, chroma, chrona, corona remember channel blue is complacency, ignorance but also fear, anxiety channel blue in South China Sea is fear of being locked in…hence the want for deep sea channel to breathe to let the submarines out. Nuclear subs in the arctic…the rotating ball…a continuity from Semey’s blast, from Kola…nuclear children of the atom…exaflop black racks in U.S. modelling an explosion, modelling time, modelling the degradation of arsenals, the change through time, the chromosoma, modelling the future as freight of I.
He is inside the control room again staring out at a city that is diaphanous, vague, contoured outside the plane, with sunsheet coming in northsealed, folding in over the docklands and the canary, his mouth agape at the monitor drooling light into conal retinoid numknuck shelters like rain patter on the Pacific refuge of a mind less slept bleeding for hours.
They’re converging, he’s saying over and over notaloudtrancic – events, dates, times – with Bill Gates on the monitor staring back at him, and a nuclear mushroom cloud transforming to a subatomic virus, a solar corona in the blood vessel. He climbs through his thorax to find the volume control, stumbling on a thousand suns in his lungs.
Bill wheels out a large barrel. April 03 2015.
“When I was a kid the disaster we worried about most was a nuclear war. That’s why we had a barrel like this [he points to the barrel, scrawled in yellow: “Survival Supplies Furnished by Office of Civil Defense Department of Defense 17 1/2 gallons] filled with cans of food and water. When the nuclear attack came we were supposed to go downstairs, hunker down, and eat out of that barrel. Today the greatest risk of global catastrophe doesn’t look like this, instead it looks like this. If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s most likely to be a highly infectious virus, rather than a war, not missiles but microbes. Now part of the reason for this is we have invested a huge amount in nuclear deterrence, but we’ve actually invested very little in a system to stop an epidemic. We are not ready for the next epidemic.”
His mouth’s no longer agape but aslant in a thoughtmode lapping wet against the nuclear chamber built here 3 years prior, 1223 solar sets markedpast, and he knows on a secret why men love the bomb and it’s something holier than the sky: we can circulate it, run our collective pasts by it, with shape, with colour, with flash and boom, but the virus, the virus has no immediate shape, no tangible demonstration of its birth nor death, no telos, and yet death comes still – hooked on a monitor coughing red mutagenic cells, wanting past this but falling into the heavy water real: that the bomb and the virus are not separate but siamese light shafts of the 20th through 21st freightlanes and We, now in the midst of their doppler, as confused as the vines.
Nuclear Inertia = 20th Century Mental Models of Cold War Crashing into 21st in Ill-Preparation for Non-Human Zoogenetic Pandemic with Large Caveat that World will return to Nuclear Cold War Freightlanes following Pandemic Correction. Talk of Great Leveller. Talk of Great Shift. Talk of Great Correction Wrong. End Transmission.
Note Trump-era Red Fear McCarthyism old-frame inertia | the treatment of Tsien, father of the Chinese Rocket all those years ago – see Thread of the Silkworm (Iris Chang, 1996) and https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/03/28/the-man-who-took-china-to-space/
Pax Sinica rising vs. Pax Americana waning is out-dated Cold War filter.
For latter: not a matter of diminishing spheres but transference of energy to new domain:
Space e.g. US Space Force, Space X, Blue Origin
A long way from 1962 when the Pacific Ocean bled its last atmospheric nuclear explosions, now the Atlantic and Pacific dotted by autonomous landing drones and re-entry rockets.
Japan used the southern part of Pingelap Island during hostilities in the Pacific Ocean theater of World War II for a supply base. Allied Forces later attacked it. The presence of foreign troops on the island led to the introduction of a number of infectious diseases, including gonorrhoea, tuberculosis and dysentery, which reduced the population from its pre-war level of around 1000 to 800, and decreased the fertility rate significantly.[1] The arrival of the U.S. Navy in 1945 resulted in the setting up of a democratically elected system alongside the traditional system, which gradually weakened in power. Universal primary education was provided for Pingelapese children and a limited health care scheme was set up to eradicate the diseases introduced during the war.[1] During the 1960s, the Peace Corps and U.S. Air Force settled on the main island. The U.S. Air Force constructed a missile watching station in the northeast of the island and a pier, with work beginning in 1978 on an airstrip, jutting into the lagoon, on the main island.[1] The runway was finished in 1982, and currently Caroline Islands Air makes two or three flights daily to and from the atoll.
A significant proportion of the population has complete achromatopsia due to total absence of working cones in their eye retinas, leaving them with only rods, a recessive genetic disorder that causes total color blindness in sufferers. This condition is known on the island as maskun, meaning literally "not see" in Pingelapese.[6][7] Complete achromatopsia is normally a very rare condition, and its prevalence on the island has been traced back to a population bottleneck in 1775 after a catastrophic typhoon swept through the island, leaving only about 20 survivors. One of these, Doahkaesa Mwanenihsed (the ruler at that time), is now believed to have been a carrier for the underlying genetic condition, but the achromatopsia disorder did not appear until the fourth generation after the typhoon, by which time 2.7% of the Pingelapese were affected. Since achromatopsia is an autosomal recessive disorder, inbreeding between the descendants of Doahkaesa Mwanenised would result in an increased recessive allele frequency.[8] By generation six, the incidence rose to approximately 4.9%,[7] due to the founder effect and inbreeding, with all achromats on the island nowadays tracing their ancestry to Doahkaesa Mwanenihsed.
Today the atoll is still of particular interest to geneticists; due to the small gene pool and rapid population growth, the disorder is now prevalent in almost 10% of the population, with a further 30% being unaffected carriers. (By comparison, in the United States, only 1 in 33,000, or 0.003%, are affected).[9] Leading neurologist Oliver Sacks's 1997 book The Island of the Colorblind[10] references the island. It is reported that one Pingelapese island sea-fisherman with this condition has difficulty seeing in bright sunlight, but at night can see in much fainter light than people with normal vision can; he uses this ability in a boat at night waving a large burning torch about to attract or confuse flying fish, which he then catches; the flying fish act as if the torch is the moon.[11] The commentator said that in his brain, brain capacity intended to process cone signals is instead added to his rod signal processing capacity. Most of the islanders say they "see" red the most prominently; they have a fondness for green as a symbolic love for nature and vegetation, despite never having seen the color.[12]
The explosion carried by atmospheric diffraction to the Island of the Colour BlindThe London Bridge Railer | 51°18’35.11″N | 0°14’25.44″W
I’m writing a history of the world. And in the process my own. The life and times of [ ]. The bit of the twentieth [sic] century to which I’ve been shackled…everything and nothing, fact and fiction, myth and evidence, images and documents…not a linear history, but a kaleidoscope, there is no sequence, everything happens at once. The machines of the new technology, I understand, perform in much the same way: all knowledge is stored, to be summoned up at the flick of a – .
This was the year he rode the subway to the ends of the city, two hundred miles of track. He liked to stand at the front of the first car, hands flat against the glass. The train smashed through the dark. People stood on local platforms staring nowhere. His body fluttered in the fastest stretches. They went so fast sometimes he thought they were on the edge of no-control. The noise was pitched to a level of pain he absorbed as a personal test. Another crazy-ass curve. There was so much iron in the sound of those curves – he could almost taste it, like a toy you put in your mouth when you are little. Workmen carried lanterns along adjacent tracks. He kept a watch for sewer rats. A tenth of a second was all it took to see a thing complete. Then the express stations, the creaky brakes, people bunched like refugees…it did not seem odd to him that the subway held more compelling things than the famous city above. There was nothing important out there, in the broad afternoon, that he could not find in purer form in these tunnels beneath the streets.
So they sit there together. Penelope and Don. The Mixologist and the Subwayler. Brought together in a strange quanta, a distant whaling station, polarine sunset. I am riding a train in falling light back towards the edge of the city, 16 miles of track blazening stopstart into viridescence and some unnoticable height. On clear nights, teenagers watch ablaze in hotbox corsas the city and the distant lights of Heathrow, where planes drop in low sequence. Moved here in 2016, the winter after university when things fell apart [ ] , couldn’t find at first the house one late night [ ] crumpled in a hedge, still-flashed on bikes jarred across Vietnam, drunken Phillipine island wheelies, roughshod across Melbourne into the Auckland night, sleepless under a church spire, hopped Hawaiian to the missile silo Arizonan mountains of Uncle [ ]. The racecourse behind is often traversed by bands of geese at 1945hrs, overing the furlonged loop where Emily Davison was crushed equine and where the sudden drop to open sky is often mistaken for the edge of the world, a marina with a sole bandstand hotel like a watchman to oceanic nether. I remember late one night, returning from a night out in the city, the uberman, thinking we had reached the sea. This is not the sea. I thought it was the sea. Door slamming on 3am fox tampering across the yellow buslane.
The beady eyes at East Croydon’s gridlock loosen out by the time the sun has dropped and the southern is pitched into Tattenham Corner’s endline. In 2018 we railed a car into the caucasian night, the summer England reached the world cup semi final and football was coming home. The cars delirial in the streets, bit-picked instagram stories, Hyde Park drought-like yellow drunkening on a thousand plastic beercups launched blueward. We watched Kane bulwarking the Croats from a listless town in Kazakhstan, arriving by night late on a television winched impossibly high into the ceiling and grainy.
How do you write a history of leviathan, of concrete, glass, steel, cement, dreams, lies, traps, spies, name it, it all connects. I’d be lying to not disclose some vantage already, less from time than the return, a rushed thesis [insert link], a work opportunity out of the blue to New Cross Gate.
I am writing a history. A plot that ties us all in. What did Don say, Penelope now limp on his shoulderblade, after the planes smacked the towers and I was seven. The terrorist, planted in a Florida town, pushing his supermarket trolley, nodding to his neighbour, lives in a far narrower format. This is his edge, his strength. Plots reduce the world…All tactical, linked, layered. He knows who we are and what we mean in the world – an idea, a righteous fever in the brain. Everything happens at once. I read the FT online a week back, Generation Putin (https://www.ft.com/content/4006f332-31a8-11ea-a329-0bcf87a328f2), Maria from Taganrog on the Black Sea in a state of dissolve: ‘We were born in this system. This system is in our brains so it is very difficult to even begin to think about the possibility of changing it.’ Things are changing here, incrementally, until they reach that blip when all things go kinetic, madman Cummings, wielding a scabre to the civil service double-barrelleds stolen from the Bristolian night, spitting chai, as northern powerhouse rebooting like an old Dell in the basement, Gideon smiling over stacks and stacks of Evening Standards, claimant claims rottening deep below redwalls splashed blue in the bluest of nights. England has always been conservative. Forest and village. Namesake and door. It’s wired in the dark regions of our soul. Brendan is pulsing tidally against the evergreens that perimeter the school ground, where a sole motion sensitive outlight is flickering against the darks of an absent sky.
___
11 December 2019
[ ]
Application of [ ] to the part time fixed term Research Assistant Position at the [ ] for Military Health Research, [ ] ref: R5/2749/[ ] | Advert ref: [ ]
Dear [ ]
Please find enclosed my application regarding the part-time fixed term Research Assistant position at the [ ] Centre for Military Health Research (ref: R5/2749[ ]). I would be greatly interested to learn more of the position and the project for which I have familiarised myself with your recent publications in the [ ] Journal of Psychotraumatology and International Review of Psychiatry. I have also familiarised myself with prior research examining the impact of moral injury on US veterans undertaken at the USA National Center for Veterans Studies, and with the recent work of Professor [ ] and Dr. [ ] in adaptive disclosure therapy as a novel treatment approach to war trauma and moral injury.
In particular, [ ] and [ ] write of the complexities of incorporating imaginal exposure exercises in cases of moral injury or traumatic loss, where the emotional processing of the experience and uncensored beliefs about the meaning and implications of an event may be more ambiguous or complex than a core life-threat based event. The authors propose the addition of ‘separate experiential “breakout” sessions, in which participants are encouraged to engage in imaginal conversations wih a key “relevant other” such as the deceased person being grieved or a respected, caring, compassionate, and forgiving moral authority.’ (Adaptive Disclosure: A New Treatment for Military Trauma, Loss, and Moral Injury, 2015, page 9).
In Moral Injury: An Intersection of Psychological and Spiritual Care (2015), Professor [ ] writes of an Afghanistan veteran experiencing prolonged exposure to moral injury concerning an incident of civilian loss of life during a military operation – ‘a sense of turning into a monster himself, his view of others as fundamentally immoral, his sense of being betrayed by the military, and his loss of the spiritual framework that had guided his sense of morality prior to service.’ Professor [ ] documents how the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Mental Health and Chaplaincy program has begun a broader dialogue on moral injury as a dimensional problem and aspect of trauma exposure distinct from posttraumatic stress disorder. Following from this, I have read more broadly into the 5 Eyes Mental Health Research and Innovation Collaborative (5 Eyes MHRIC) and with current research into evidence-based innovations in non-trauma focused treatments such as interpersonal therapy; novel pharmacotherapy; personalized medicine and the broader role of family and support networks in treating moral injury components in current and former military personnel suffering from mental health disorders.
As I understand it, the position advertised will require undertaking a literature review of open source evidence and current research on moral injury and what is known about the effect of individual differences (e.g. age, gender, ethnicity) on susceptibility and resilience to moral injury and the impact of moral injury on an individual’s beliefs and behaviours. In addition, the position will require supporting the broader project as it aims to bring together clinician perspectives with UK veterans’ perspectives toward the development of a standardised approach for treatment of moral injury and toward a framework that more closely supports clinicians’ assessments of the care they deliver to those affected by moral injury. With regards to undertaking research for the project, I bring a year of experience in undertaking open source research from my current part time (0.6FT) position as a Research Assistant to Professor [ ]. In this role, I have been required to undertake primary research and literature reviews toward [ ] forthcoming book with [ ]. The research has held a component of witness trauma and imaginal exposure literature, particularly in relation to [ ]’s investigation with [ ] into experiences of detention and torture among former detainees in [ ] Military Prison, Syria.
With regards to writing and collaborating with the broader research team to prepare final reports for funders and peer reviewed journals, I bring experience in coordinating and delivering research, most recently through an independent initiative set up with fellow students at [ ] and through an investigative human rights report presented in collaboration with [ ] at [ ] Netherlands in 2018. With regards to the administrative requirements of the position vis-a-vis liaising with the project’s funding body, stakeholders and PIs, I bring further professional experience from a 16 month role at [ ] as an Associate coordinating immigration applications for clients from India and the U.S to the UK. As I understand it, the position requires flexibility in terms of location of work, collaboration and input into other studies within the department. This mirrors much of the current arrangements in my position at [ ] I am also familiar with [ ]’s departments, particularly the Department of War [ ] through an affiliation with [ ] , a PhD candidate.
I am cognisant that I do not bring a formal degree in epidemiology or psychology however I hope that my candidacy might be considered initially on the merits of its energy placed into the open source evidence and research on moral injury. There are a number of broader sources I would like to bring in such as your [ ] 2019 paper in the Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps and [ ] et. al’s [ ] 2019 paper in the Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. I would be thrilled, if granted a panel interview, to prepare and present an example of the research I might more systematically bring to the project in the advertised position. Should my candidacy not fit the requirements of the position, I would be thrilled in lieu to explore a dialogue of other ways with which I might become involved in the project as it aligns directly with areas of my own research in cognitive inertia, perception and misperception in international relations that I have previously detailed to Dr. [ ] by email. I have enclosed my curriculum vitae, academic transcript and a former reference from Professor [ ] at the University of [ ] with further details in corroboration of the above. Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to hopefully establishing a dialogue with the project.
Yours sincerely,
[ ]
___
51° 18′ 32.4″ N, 0° 14′ 34.8″ W
The letter arrives, written on the front in bold black font – V.S.R. He takes the dog out to the hill, a mother sits on a bench glaring into the sunset, glints off of the lambrini bottle, saw kids lastweek mock from sons school, her marriage, loss, rolling out into the downs shade, shapes come pouring out of the endline, cross the road to the Texaco, turning corners, sits a distance, searches the initials before opening – claim the suspense for that moment of sundip, coolness, VSR, VSR, little like USSR, VHS, old video cassettes, VSR:
The drunk woman cannot feel the cold, he senses, dogmarlan loosened on the scraps of undefined aside her bench, in memoriam, to, the setting sun it seems, bonebag names etched silver, cool metal running up the spine, VSR, VSR – come away marlan, not there, izzok, clink of bottle, laugh faint, fading across the senescent down – the lightlevel drops a tone leaving him asquint at the now open letter that is post triptych card black, three images an ocean liner, a rocket, a desert of pylons, stretch out, minute font above – blue oceanic deep unconscious – red fast conscious escape velocity – grey, everday dreamsend treadmill.
More shadows have come streaming out of the endline. He turns the postcard, a note in handwritten smudged black:
Veterans of the Silk Roads… Discovery of the New Silk Soul
Splitting Is Eternis; Fissionable Are You.
51.5045° N, 0.0865° W | 01.03.2020 | Dusk
I.F.
Barks now, come apull at the lead, threaten the arrival of another – sorrymut too late for scraps, a plane maps a streak of white entrails against the darkened vista, clink, lambrini, down sorrows gullet, engines carlights now dopplering the sole road that loops below – Veterans of the Silk Roads, Veterans? He stands to leave, marlan sniffing, plants opening, the strange resolve of sunset vigil repeating – minds held to the benches wandering somewhere else, her in them, he in the images, the strange triptych black images, so he slips past the endline and the Texaco, climbs the road, opens the door unawares of him doing with summerlast, on a rooftop in Almaty, watching the sun drop into Kazakh smog billowing his mind. Coordinates. 01 march. Dusk. Splitting. I.F., the New Silk Soul? [Googles: New Silk Soul Bi-stretch silk shorts S$ 146.25 Part of the New Silk Soul collection these light grey shorts have been expertly crafted from an ultra smooth silk-elastane knit, made especially for La Perla in Italy. The perfect blend of lingerie and ready-to-wear these curve-embracing shorts promise both a luxurious skin-feel and superior fit wear after wear. Easy care, wear dawn through dusk and beyond without compromising your comfort or style. Made in Italy. CFILPD0023356_GR0004] What? But a veteran? He is 25.
___
He takes I.F.’s learning to heart.
1. Reality is fundamentally discontinuous and heterogeneous.
2. History and society do not crawl.
3. They make jumps. They go from fracture to fracture, with a few vibrations in between.
4. Yet we believe in the predictable, small incremental progression.
5. Events present themselves to us in a distorted way. Consider the nature of information: of the millions, maybe even trillions, of small facts that prevail before an event occurs, only a few will turn out to be relevant later to your understanding of what happened. Because your memory is limited and filtered, you will be inclined to remember those data that subsequently match the facts, unless you are like the eponymous Funes in the short story by Jorge Luis Borges, “Funes, the Memorious,” who forgets nothing and seems condemned to live with the burden of the accumulation of unprocessed information. (He does not manage to live too long.)
Working in an after-image of dusklight, turn your head away from the fireball, and you get tail-like lesions, remembering I.F.’s murmurings of the Heartland Cafe, Oppenheimer, the bomb over coffee.
He begins climbing through the trove of old documents, his time at Forensic [ ]. He’s like Nicholas Branch in Libra, in his glove-leather armchair, retired senior analyst of the Central Intelligence Agency – a veteran – hired on contract to write the secret history of the assasination of President Kennedy. Six point nine seconds of heat and light. With a copy of Camus’s The Outsider, not pretentious, necessary. Camus always had a sensibility to heat and light.
’Camus’s notebooks are punctuated from their beginnings in 1935, like his earliest lyrical essays, by a series of descriptions of natural phenomena to which he responds with an almost erotic sensitivity: a thin, transparent band of blue sky beneath storm clouds in August 1935; light through branches out of an open window of the room where he was convalescing from tuberculosis in January 1936; the sun above him as he descends a hill, coming out of woods with friends into ‘‘the miraculous daylight’’;26 the joy of sheer immersion in the North African sunlight at the ruins of Tipasa (The Black Side of the Sun, Matthew Sharpe)
In The Outsider, Meursault contorts under oppressive heat and light. By the water shortly before he murders the Arab, sunlight thuds in his head, ‘I clenched my fists in my trouser pockets and keyed up every nerve to fend off the sun and the dark befuddlement it was pouring into me. Whenever a blade of vivid light shot upward from a bit of shell or broken glass lying on the sand, my haws set hard. I wasn’t going to be beatn, and I walked steadily on. Later in court, he tells the judge he killed the Arab ‘because of the sun’.
Camus died on 4 January 1960 when his publisher Michel Gallimard lost control of his car and it crashed into a tree. With a manuscript of the First Man in the mangled wreck, killed instantly Gallimard days later. “The accident seemed to have been caused by a blowout or a broken axle; experts were puzzled by its happening on a long stretch of straight road, a road 30 feet wide, and with little traffic at the time,” Herbert Lottman wrote in his 1978 biography of the author. Catelli believes a passage in Zábrana’s diaries explains why: the poet wrote in the late summer of 1980 that “a knowledgeable and well-connected man” had told him the KGB was to blame. “They rigged the tyre with a tool that eventually pierced it when the car was travelling at high speed.” KGB, or he thinks, light now absented from the window scene outside, because of the –
Low angle October sun streaked through, lesioning eyes on a quiet January road, fraying the chassis into his instant, interminable heart. And in the First Man, last page: ‘today he felt life, youth, people slipping away from him, without being able to hold onto any of them, left with the blind hope that this obscure force that for so many years had raised him above the daily routine, nourished him unstintingly, and been equal to the most difficult circumstances – that, as it had with endless generosity given him reason to live, it would also give him reason to grow old and die without rebellion. He died because of the sun. A tall dark fellow in the VSR, lackspeech, stares at a Black Sea sun through old spectacles, a fried brain loped in the after-image burn of a Chechnyan service, rocking back and forth in lesions between episodes:
Tchijevsky A. L. 1926: Physical Factors of the Historical Process, Translated by Vladimir P. de Smitt, Cycles 1971: 22 pp. 11-27.
The sun is an enormous generator of electric energy and emits it in the form of radiation and induction. The sun is surrounded by an electromagnetic field, the limits of which reach beyond the farthermost planet Neptune, and therefore the earth with its electro-magnetic field is in the sun’s field of tremendous power. […] Episodical leaps or rises in the sun’s activity, given the existence in human societies of polito-economical and other exciting factors, are capable of calling forth a synchronic rising in human collective bodies. Formula: the rising of the sunspot activity transforms the people’s potential energy into kinetic energy. Professor Tchijevsky’s studies in the sphere of synthesizing historical material have enabled him to determine the following morphological law of the historical process.
6. The course of the universal historical process is composed of an uninterrupted sequence of cycles, occupying a period equaling in the average, eleven years and synchronizing in the degree of its military~political activity with the sunspot activity. Each cycle possesses the following historiopsychological characteristics: (a) In the middle points of the cycle, the mass activity of all humanity, assuming the presence in human societies of economical, political or military exciting factors, reaches the maximum tension, manifesting itself in psychomotoric pandemics;; revolutions, insurrections, expeditions, migrations, etc. – thus creating new formations in the existing separate states and new historical epochs in the life of humanity. It‘s accompanied by an integration of the masses, full expression of their activity and a majority government. (b) In the extreme points of the cycle’s course, the tension of the all human military- political activity falls to the minimum, giving way to creative activity, and is accompanied by a general decrease of military or political enthusiasm, by peace and peaceful creative work in the sphere of state organizations, international relations, science and art, with a pronounced tendency toward absolutism in the governing powers and a disintegration of the masses. 7. The maximum of human activities in correlation with the maximum of sunspot activity, expresses itself in the following: (a) The dissemination of different doctrines (political, religious, etc.), the spreading of heresies, religious riots, pilgrimages, etc. (b) The appearance of social, military and religious leaders, reformers, etc. (c) The formation of political, military, religious and commercial corporations, associations, unions, leagues, sects, companies, etc. 8. It is impossible to overlook the fact that pathological epidemics also coincide very frequently with the sunspot maximum periods. 9. Thus the existence of a dependence of the behavior of humanity on sunspot activity should be considered established.
A film trilogy by Anton Vidokle presents a contemporary interpretation of the cosmist worldview. The first film, This Is Cosmos, is a video that mixes excerpts of Fedorov’s writing with texts by Voloshin, Maria Ender, Alexander Chizhevsky, Ilya Kabakov, Andrei Monastirs, and others. The second part, entitled The Communist Revolution Was Caused by the Sun, was shown at the 6th Moscow Biennale of Contemporary Art, and explores some of Chizhevsky’s ideas about medical heliobiology and the relationship between solar cycles and human history.9 While watching the film, the viewer makes a journey to Kazakhstan, where Chizhevsky worked for a long time. Kazakhstan has also been the heart of the Soviet, and now Russian, space programs, as it is the site of the Baikonur Cosmodrome, where Russian rockets are launched into space. Vidokle’s third film is currently in the works. Quite curious in this regard is his sci-fi noir film Sound of the Sun, produced many years ago in collaboration with Natasha Nord. The film deals with the notion that sunlight is sound, and that people behave differently when this sound is amplified. This is a clear reference to Chizhevsky’s heliocentric theories, according to which people’s actions are directly dependent on bursts of solar activity. The cosmist tendency has been clearly legible in post-Soviet art beyond conceptualism. We might recall Leonid Tishkov’s “macaroni cosmism.” Tishkov evoked the cosmists through futuristic designs built from macaroni, including a macaroni tube, dedicated to Tsiolkovsky, for traveling in space, and an “Ionic Sun,” a prickly ball of spaghetti noodles, arranged in rays, that resembled both the sun and Chizhevsky’s renowned chandelier.
Reality is fundamentally discontinuous and heterogeneous. Thumbing now through pages of old investigations with lamplight auroras of dust rising in his nostrils, and the monitor clicking through screens, he has I.F.’s mantra on murmur, crystallising focus:
There is a reality hidden here, that’s right before your eyes, if you want to see it, and it is nuclear.
Why Nixon went to China, it was the bomb program, operating behind the scenes…
Nuclear in angles, like a test site.
Nuclear in sun-end, like a demon.
Nuclear in the long night, like a thief.
He writes in italics in the margins of the pages.
https://forensic-architecture.org/investigation/killing-in-umm-al-hiran
We move from fracture to fracture, but loss is still a landscape rolled out in blue… The fractures
01.12.18 Piled on a Tate Britain floorscape dark, watching the desert edge come up in blue morning light. Retinal lesions on the thermal imaging, heatshots cooling to interminable loss. Minutes prior, confusion comes, screaming against the sky. A voiceover dopplering in softspoken: My name is Keren Manor. I’m a member of a political collective of photographers called Active stills. We document political and social issues in Palestine and in Israel. In the night between the 17th and the 18th of January 2017, I went to the Bedouin village of Umm al-Hiran in the Negev desert, after residents of the village published a call out for activists and for the media to come and document the expected demolition of the village and to stand with them in solidarity. This Bedouin village was demolished so that a Jewish settlement could be built there. Around five something, in the morning I see a huge amount of lights, of police cars, and police that start to run into the village like it was a warzone.I run after the policemen and I start filming. And very shortly after I hear some shots. I realise it is live shooting but I still don’t understand what is going on. Without thinking I just stop the camera and try to find a safe place. The shots continue and I realise something serious is probably going on and I turn on the camera again. From that moment I hear the constant sound of a car horn that lasts more than an hour. It is all a total mess and I don’t understand exactly what is going on, I keep hearing the beeping of the car that is next to me but I cannot see the car. The next morning, it was reported that two people had been killed in the raid. A Palestinian Bedouin man, Yaqub Musa Abu alQi’an. And an Israeli policeman, Erez Levi. According to a tweet by the Israeli police, the deaths were the result of a ‘terror attack’. News reports echoed the account of the police, claiming that Abu Al Qi’an had been killed after intentionally running over Erez Levi.
03.07.19 Haaretz publishes an article – New Footage sheds light on fraught, fatal 2017 episode in Bedouin village – noting how “The newly released footage from policemen’s body cameras shows Abu al-Kiyan losing control of his vehicle after he was shot. The vehicle proceeds on its way at high speed and shots can be heard in the background. After a few seconds the vehicle stops and its horn starts honking. A policeman can be seen opening the door and removing Abu al-Kiyan. “It is unusual to get footage from so many angles regarding a single incident,” he says. “If the Justice Ministry’s department had related to the evidence like we do, they would have clearly seen that the police were responsible for the deaths of Abu al-Kiyan and Erez Levy, and for Odeh’s serious injuries. What we see is a persistent effort to manipulate the evidence, including the failure to provide evidence. The policeman who shot live bullets at Abu-Kiyan and the one who shot at Odeh should be put on trial.
11.04.18 The community of residents of Umm al Hiran announce the end of their long struggle against eviction. Ra’ed al-Qi’an, Yakub’s nephew, says the killing of his uncle has broken the spirit of the residents, and that they intend to leave in order to avoid ‘further bloodshed’. “I am crying as I speak to you, after they coerced us into this agreement that removes us from Umm al-Hiran – where we have lived for 63 years – for racist reasons, to establish a Jewish settlement on the ruins of Umm al-Hiran. He adds: “the agreement was signed at 2 a.m. after heavy pressure, in the presence of the southern police command and under threat that what happened on January 18, 2017, will happen again within days. We were forced to sign the agreement in order to safeguard the safety of the people so that things would not deteriorate and return to what happened in the past with bloodshed and killing.”
12.07.19 (2 years, 5 months & 24 days since)
Reality is fundamentally discontinuous and heterogeneous. I remember the sense I felt from the footage of that night that it was on the threshold of daybreak, the raid occurred in the last hour of dark at 05:30. At around 0600 the helicopter goes away. Light is slowly coming up, the images of the dark night start having a kind of light shade of blue in the aftermath of the killing, and there is an image of blue sky behind the red streaking down Ayman Odeh’s face as he sits dazed on a raised hill.
Nuclear in angles, like a test site.
Nuclear in sun-end, like a demon.
Nuclear in the long night, like a thief.
Scribbling further. Against the cold light of day logic of truth, Umm al Hiran problematizes notions of the secret, truth, deception, light darkness – Splitting Is Eternis, Fissionable Are You:
There is something in Derrida’s Secret (Charles Barbour, 2017) re: the different notions of the secret from Derrida and Levinas, for Derrida, we are saturated in secrets, for Levinas the opposite is the case, a secret and its uncovering is a sudden, transparent illumination, ‘it is a question of exposure without shelter, as under a leaden sun without protective shade’, and ‘exposure without reserve’, This general challenge to secrecy and invisibility, and privileging of beatific transparency, is reinforced in many of Levinas’s other writings. Indeed, it would not be too much to say that, along with being the great recent thinker of ethics, the infinite and the other, Levinas is the great critic of the secret. Thus, in God, Death, and Time, for example, he speaks of the subject ‘bearing witness’, and maintains that ‘there is no refuge for this subject in the secrecy that would protect him from the neighbour’. Rather, he says, ‘it is a question of exposure without shelter, as under a leaden sun without protective shade’ and ‘exposure without reserve’. Where this relates to Umm al Hiran is how Umm problematises the idea of facts emerging in the cold light of day, this entire event is unfolding on the threshold of dawn but as the light rises, the facts do not actually become clearer, depth of vision may become clearer but the depth of the incident is still too durationally packed tight, it is still to tense, too ‘ravelled’, the binaristic view of revelation, the light and darkness, the secret is undone.
This binary is also something explored by Deleuze and Guattari, page 251 part of Deleuze’s and Guattari’s critique of psychoanalysis, and of the psychoanalytic conception of the unconscious and the Oedipus complex. Its primary thrust is to consider the subject of the secret without submitting to a ‘binary machine’, or the simple opposition between revelation and concealment. The secret is not merely something hidden that, with proper techniques, might be revealed (which is how Deleuze and Guattari characterise the Freudian unconscious and the Freudian analysis). It is not about the imperceptible as opposed to the perceptible, but instead a becoming-imperceptible. […] If it is the case that the secret is already exposed, and that its exposure is itself invariably secretive, it is also the case that the secret circulates and roams even while remaining a secret. As Deleuze and Guattari put it, ‘the secret has a way of spreading that is in turn shrouded in secrecy. The secret as secretion. The secret must sneak, insert, or introduce itself into the arena of public forums.’4 Crucially, then, from Deleuze and Guattari’s perspective, the secret is not private in any sense of the word. Indeed, its operation is fundamentally public or, as Deleuze and Guattari also say at this moment in their text, social.
‘The secret was invented by society’, they write; ‘it is a sociological notion. Every secret is a collective assemblage.’ Indeed, for Deleuze “and Guattari, the secret can never be anything ‘static’ like a private property. Rather, and now referring to some of their own technical concepts or vocabulary, ‘only becomings are secrets’. It can never be contained by a fixed and located form. In essence, Deleuze and Guattari propose that, once we reject the notion of a secret as something hidden that might be revealed (or the ‘binary machine’, as we saw above), and try to think of it instead in terms of becomings, we also shift, in more psychoanalytic terms, from ‘hysterical childhood content’ to ‘virile paranoid form’. That is to say, analysis can no longer be about exposing a childhood trauma (that is itself related to and structured by the Oedipus complex). It now must reckon with the eternal semiosis, or the unending signifying chain, of the paranoid mind – a mind that, as soon as one claims to have exposed a hidden truth that is the cause for its symptomatic belief in a fantastic conspiracy, absorbs that supposed truth back into the conspiracy. As Deleuze and Guattari put it, the paranoid mind might be seen to operate in one of two ways. ‘On the one hand’, they write, ‘paranoids denounce the international plot of those who steal their secret . . . or they declare that they have the gift of perceiving the secrets of others’. Here the model of the secret as concealment and revelation retains some force. ‘On the other hand’, however, ‘paranoics act by means of, or else suffer from, rays they emit or receive . . . Influence by rays, and doubling by flight or echo, are what now give the secret its infinite form, in which perceptions as well as actions pass into imperceptibility.
Thinking in terms of the way state erasure, or the withholding of evidence, selective release, suppression of information, or corroboration of a single version of an incident could be explored as an operation on the distribution of the sensible, it is not so much that the secret is under the surface of things, but that it is in circulation in what is said and unsaid, seen and unseen, if a cordon is theorised as something site-specific which closes off and keeps hidden the forensic procedures of the state, then there is also a cordon that moves in the sub-cortical zones of a polity, it concerns the distribution of the sensible, is concerns not what is being searched for but the actual parameters of the search itself – how perception is managed, how media releases are phrased, how video is framed, all work on skewing the distribution of the sensible and what is perceptible in favour of the state or dominant power that be.
WHY IS MY LIFE A STRING OF NUCLEAR SUNSETS
Because life is obliterative…. You are remade over…. massumi…Lambert-Mogiliansky’s highly mathematical quantum model of human beings as collapsing superpositions and Judith Butler’s performative model of agency (which figures centrally in Karen Barad’s approach to desires and beliefs; rather, they make someone a gendered subject with those desires and beliefs in the first place.
a chimera of the human and the artificial. || Shard-light dancing through the skin….
Londongrad as outer satelitte pole of Eurasia for launder + trans-Atlantia dollar conversion is the Corpus Callosum between Two Hemispheres
China (spatial and synthetic)
U.S. (analytic and sequential)
Each composed with the three dimensions of their respective oceanic-continental-space bearing souls.
“Left and right hemispheres are characterized by inbuilt, qualitatively different and mutually antagonistic modes of cognitive processing, the left being basically analytic and sequential, the right spatial and synthetic. A rationale was added for the evolution of cerebral asymmetry based on the functional advantages of having the two cognitive modes develop in separate hemispheres in order to minimize mutual interference.”
When an Idea is Nuclear
THE AURORA BOREALIS WAR
The Delicacy of the Dance – An Inward Motion (China), An Outward Motion (U.S.) | Introversionalis x Extroversionalis | Thucydidean dance
U.S Evangelical Expansionism
Across the Atlantic the foundations of a distinct vision of world order were being laid in the “New World.” As Europe’s seventeenth-century political and sectarian conflicts raged, Puritan settlers had set out to redeem God’s plan with an “errand in the wilderness” that would free them from adherence to established (and in their view corrupted) structures of authority.
Chinese Tianxia
At the opposite end of the Eurasian landmass from Europe, China was the center of its own hierarchical and theoretically universal concept of order. This system had operated for millennia—it had been in place when the Roman Empire governed Europe as a unity—basing itself not on the sovereign equality of states but on the presumed boundlessness of the Emperor’s reach. In this concept, sovereignty in the European sense did not exist, because the Emperor held sway over “All Under Heaven.” He was the pinnacle of a political and cultural hierarchy, distinct and universal, radiating from the center of the world in the Chinese capital outward to all the rest of humankind. The latter were classified as various degrees of barbarians depending in part on their mastery of Chinese writing and cultural institutions (a cosmography that endured well into the modern era). China, in this view, would order the world primarily by awing other societies with its cultural magnificence and economic bounty, drawing them into relationships that could be managed to produce the aim of “harmony under heaven.” Excerpt From: Henry Kissinger. “World Order: Reflections on the Character of Nations and the Course of History”. Apple Books.
THE DELICACY OF THE DANCE – AN INWARD MOTION… THE U.S. AN OUTWARD MOTION…
Two Celestial Bodies….Two Suns.
The Three Body Problem for Londongrad.
The Japanese word for Japan is 日本, which is pronounced Nihon or Nippon and literally means “the origin of the sun”. The character nichi (日) means “sun” or “day”; hon (本) means “base” or “origin” The compound therefore means “origin of the sun” and is the source of the popular Western epithet “Land of the Rising Sun”.The red disc symbolizes the Sun and the red lines are light rays shining from the rising sun. The South Korean parliamentary committee for sports asked the organizers of 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo to ban the Rising Sun flag. According to Korean lawmaker An Min-suk, it could not be a peaceful Olympics with the flag in the stadium. The organizers refused to ban the flag from venues.In September 2019, the Chinese Civil Association for Claiming Compensation from Japan sent a letter to the International Olympic Committee in order to ban the flag.However, most countries who participate in the 2020 Summer Olympics did not request a ban.
The Empire of Japan (大日本帝国, Dai Nippon Teikoku, literally “Empire of Great Japan”)[10] was the historical nation-state[nb 2] and great power that existed from the Meiji Restoration in 1868 to the enactment of the 1947 constitution of modern Japan.[6] Japan’s rapid industrialization and militarization under the slogan Fukoku Kyōhei (富国強兵, “Enrich the Country, Strengthen her Armed Forces”) and Shokusan Kōgyō (殖産興業, “Promote Industry”) led to its emergence as a world power and the establishment of a colonial empire following the First Sino-Japanese War, the Boxer Rebellion, the Russo-Japanese War, and World War I. Economic and political turmoil in the 1920s led to the rise of militarism, nationalism and totalitarianism, eventually culminating in Japan’s membership in the Axis alliance and the conquest of a large part of the Asia-Pacific in World War II.[13] Japan’s armed forces initially achieved large-scale military successes during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945) and the Pacific War. However, after many Allied victories and following the Soviet Union’s declaration of war against Japan on August 9, 1945, and subsequent invasion of Manchuria and other territories, and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Empire surrendered to the Allies on August 15, 1945. A period of occupation by the Allies followed. In 1947, with American involvement, a new constitution was enacted, officially bringing the Empire of Japan to an end. Occupation and reconstruction continued until 1952, eventually forming the current constitutional monarchy known as Japan.
Today the words “Empire of Japan” evoke multiple meanings: one set of images for former colonial subjects, another for former enemies in the Pacific War, and yet another for the Japanese themselves. No epoch did more to inscribe these words with meaning than the period between 1931 and 1945, when Japan moved aggressively to expand its overseas territory, occupying first China and then Southeast Asia, and initiating a series of military conflicts against Nationalist and Communist forces in China, against the Soviet Union, against the United States, and against the British Empire. At the heart of the new empire Japan won and then lost in the military engagements of these years lay the puppet state of Manchukuo in Northeast China. Although Manchukuo was created in 1932, its roots went back to 1905, when Japan acquired a sphere of influence in the southern half of Man- churia as a result of victory in the Russo-Japanese War. A mix of formal and informal elements, the South Manchurian sphere of influence was anchored by long-term leases on the Liaodong Peninsula and on lands held by Japan’s colonial railway company, the South Manchurian Railway, which the Japanese knew as Mantetsu. Over these leased territories, which represented but a small fraction of South Manchuria, Japan ruled directly through a formal colonial apparatus. Over the rest of South Manchuria Japan exerted influence indirectly, through the relationship with local Chi- nese rulers, through economic dominance of the market, and through the constant threat of force by its garrison army.
IF WE ARE SMEAR, WHERE ETHICS? A STRING OF NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS…. REMADE ANEW… I am become bereft, restarter of worlds..
WANTS TO PUT THE WORLD LEADERS INTO SPACE… BUT IN ORDER TO DO SO … HAS TO WORK OUT THEIR WORLDVIEW, UMWELLTSCHATUNG, NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THE COMPOSITION OF EACH INDIVIDUAL SOUL…. blue/red/grey – a 360….
“In Deleuze and Guattari, a plateau is reached when circumstances combine to bring an activity to a pitch of intensity that is not automatically dissipated in a climax. The heightening of energies is sustained long enough to leave a kind of afterimage of its dynamism that can be reactivated or injected into other activities, creating a fabric of intensive states between which any number of connecting routes could exist.”
WHY THEY ARE HOOKED UP LOOKING FRAIL…. STARTED OFF STRONG MEN… GROUND DOWN… DISSOLUTION…
A schizophrenic out for a walk is a better model than a neurotic lying on the analyst’s couch. A breath of fresh air, a relationship with the outside world. Lenz’s stroll, for example, as reconstructed by Buchner. This walk outdoors is different from the moments when Lenz finds himself closeted with his pastor, who forces him to situate himself socially, in relationship to the God of established religion, in relationship to his father, to his mother. While taking a stroll outdoors, on the other hand, he is in the mountains, amid falling snowfiakes, with other gods or without any gods at all, without a family, without a father or a mother, with nature. “What does my father want? Can he offer me more than that? Impossible. Leave me in peace.”1 Everything is a machine. Celestial machines, the stars or rainbows in the sky, alpine machines— all of them connected to those of his body. The continual whirr of machines. “He thought that it must be a feeling of endless bliss to be in contact with the profound life of every form, to have a soul for rocks, metals, water, and plants, to take into himself, as in a dream, every element of nature, like flowers that breathe with the waxing and waning of the moon.”la To be a chlorophyll- or a photosynthesis-machine, or at least slip his body into such machines as one part among the others. Lenz has projected himself back to a time before the man-nature dichotomy, before all the co-ordinates based on this fundamental dichotomy have been laid down. He does not live nature as nature, but as a process of production. There is no such thing as either man or nature now, only a process that produces the one within the other and couples the machines together. Producing-machines, desiring-machines everywhere, schizophrenic machines, all of species life: the self and the non-self, outside and inside, no longer have any meaning whatsoever.
“China and Europe stand at either end of the New Silk Road. His speeches drew attention to the long connections between China and Europe from ancient times along both the land and the sea routes: “We ”“need to build a bridge of common cultural prosperity linking the two major civilizations of China and Europe. China represents in an important way the Eastern civilization, while Europe is the birthplace of the Western civilization” (Xi Jinping, 2014a).”
HONG-SHANG-JING / NY-LON-KONG / ASTA-XI’AN / MOSC-ZEMLYA – STARING INTO THE SUN, LESIONS DYADING ON HIS RETINA… He only sees dyads / triads – a world in quantum entangles… lesions burning futural…nuclear sunsets, each doubled over to theirs, and sees the new silk soul not as a spirit but a playground for the gods, polymorpha, poly-nebula, coronae of heat and cold, and all coming home to our own oblitera, our soul-splitting passage in the wake of the day, dyadic lesions burning the surface.
THE FOCUS ON THE ARCTIC BRIDGE…
Discovery of the New Silk Soul – what is the composition of the New Silk Soul
The return…flight to space…entry to the cult…
Wichita Glen Campbell, Silk Road Veterans…Vietnam…Korea…Afghanistan…Arctic…Novaya Zemlya…
If reality ultimately consists of superpositions, then a key question is how it gets from many possible worlds to the one actual world we observe in the physics lab – from ghostly wave func- tions to well-defined, material particles hitting a screen. Known most commonly (if not precisely) as the ‘collapse’ of the wave function
EACH OF THE VETERANS ARE HOOKED UP LIKE IN INCEPTION TO SOME SERUM THAT ALLOWS THEM TO DREAM… SOME OPIOID SERUM…
Is he refractive, quoting all sorts of esoteric speeches…. Mao Zedong… George Bush…etc…etc…
The world is yours, as well as ours, but in the last analysis, it is yours. You young people, full of vigour and vitality, are in the bloom of life, like the sun at eight or nine in the morning. Our hope is placed on you. The world belongs to you. China’s future belongs to you.
Mao Zedong, ‘Talk at a Meeting with Chinese Students and Trainees in Moscow,’ 17 November 1957
The Three Body Problem | The Theory of Three Worlds was formally announced on 22 February 1974. In a meeting with Zambian president Kenneth Kaunda, Mao Zedong explained: I see the United States and the Soviet Union as the first world … . The United States and the Soviet Union have many nuclear bombs and are both quite wealthy. The second world, including Europe, Japan, Australia, and Canada, have fewer nuclear bombs and are not as wealthy, but remain wealthier than the third world. We are the third world, and the population of the third world is very large. Apart from Japan, all of Asia is in the third world. The entirety of Africa is in the third world, and so too is Latin America
A MOTIF IS THAT THE SOCIETIES WE EACH LIVE IN ARE FAR WEIRDER ARE FAR MORE AMORPHIC… A PLATE OUTSHOT…. A DISTORTED FOREST…
THREE WORLDS…. FIRST WORLD …. SECOND WORLD… THIRD WORLD….
THREE BODY PROBLEM… INABILITY TO PREDICT THE MOVEMENTS OF THE BODIES…LEADS TO AGGRESSION…. THREE BODY PROBLEM AS IT PERTAINS TO LONDON…. WORLD-SYSTEMS THEORY BUT OF THREE DIFFERENT AREAS OF LONDON?
afterlives are potentialities as much as they are historical realities. On this point, the philosopher Alfred North Whitehead is illuminating: ‘A feeling bears on itself the scars of its birth; it recollects as a subjective emotion its struggle for existence; it retains the impress of what it might have been, but is not … . The actual cannot be reduced to mere matter of fact in divorce from the potential.’
Staring at a 2004 satelitte image of his house in putney…. Inequality in parliament should be approached through satelitte images of homes… “a rising tide would lift all boats,” to use an expression that became popular in the postwar era, when the tide did seem to be rising. ” Excerpt From: Thomas Piketty. “Capital and Ideology”.
| LIFE IS A STRING OF LOW-YIELD BOMBS…. INTERSECTING… LARGER BOMBS …WARS…ETC…ETC…
HOOKED UP ON FMRI … PROBING THEIR SOULS….
“the cortex, the outer shell that mediates most so-called higher functions of the brain, and certainly those of which we are conscious, arose out of the underlying subcortical structures which are concerned with biological regulation at an unconscious level; and the frontal lobes, the most recently evolved part of the neocortex, which occupy a much bigger part of the brain in humans than in our animal relatives, and which grow forwards from and ‘on top of’ the rest of the cortex, mediate most of the sophisticated activities that mark us out as human – planning, decision making, perspective taking, self-control, and so on. In other words, the structure of the brain reflects its history: as an evolving dynamic system, in which one part evolves out of, and in response to, another.”
…. A BUNCH OF VETERANS…. DEPTH OF THE INERTIAS YOU COULD NEVER KNOW…. GUATTARI’S LA BORDE…. PARANOIAC.. … A ROOM OF FMRI MONITORS….
Quantum …. suicide…. The judgement (Kafka)
“the brain can be seen as something like a huge country: as a nested structure, of villages and towns, then districts, gathered into counties, regions and even partly autonomous states or lands – a conglomeration of nuclei and ganglia at one level, organisational foci and broader functional regions within specific gyri or sulci (the folds of the cortex) at another, these then forming lobes, and those lobes ultimately forming part of one or other cerebral hemisphere. If it is true that consciousness arises from, or at any rate is mediated by, the sheer density and complexity of neuronal interconnections within the brain, this structure has some important consequences for the nature of that consciousness. The brain should not be thought of as an indiscriminate mass of neurones: the structure of that mass matters.”
IF WE ARE SMEAR, WHERE ETHICS? A STRING OF NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS…. REMADE ANEW… I am become bereft, restarter of worlds..
WANTS TO PUT THE WORLD LEADERS INTO SPACE… BUT IN ORDER TO DO SO … HAS TO WORK OUT THEIR WORLDVIEW, UMWELLTSCHATUNG, NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THE COMPOSITION OF EACH INDIVIDUAL SOUL…. blue/red/grey – a 360….
WHY THEY ARE HOOKED UP LOOKING FRAIL…. STARTED OFF STRONG MEN… GROUND DOWN… DISSOLUTION…The man of ressentiment, as Nietzsche explains, “loves hiding places, secret paths and back doors, everything covert entices him as his world, his security, his refreshment; he understands how to keep silent, how not to forget, how to wait, how to be provisionally self-deprecating and humble.”2 Such a man, Nietzsche concludes, needs very much to believe in some neutral, independent “subject”—the ego—for he is prompted by an instinct of self-affirmation and Jeff-preservation that cares little about preserving or affirming life, an instinct “in which every lie is sancti- fied.”3 This is the realm of the silent majority. And it is into these back rooms, behind the closed doors of the analyst’s office, in the wings of the Oedipal theater, that Deleuze and Guattari weave their way, exclaiming as does Nietzsche that it smells bad there, and that what is needed is “a breath of fresh air, a relationship with the outside world.”
The schizo knows how to leave: he has made departure into something as simple as being born or dying. But at the same time his journey is strangely stationary, in place. He does not speak of another world, he is not from another world: even when he is displacing himself in space, his is a journey in intensity, around the desiring-machine that is erected here and remains here. For here is the desert propagated by our world, and also the new earth, and the machine that hums, around which the schizos revolve, planets for a new sun. These men of desire—or do they not yet exist?—are like Zarathustra. They know incredible suffer- ings, vertigos, and sicknesses. They have their specters. They must reinvent each gesture. But such a man produces himself as a free man, irresponsible, solitary, and joyous, finally able to say and do something simple in his own name, without asking permission; a desire lacking nothing, a flux that overcomes barriers and codes, a name that no longer designates any ego whatever. He has simply ceased being afraid of becoming mad. He experiences and lives himself as the sublime sickness that will no longer affect him. Here, what is, what would a psychiatrist be worth?
A SOCIAL CATASTROPHE and AN ECONOMIC | CHERNOBYL PRAYER | NUCLEAR
THE FAMOUS CARTOON OF ALL OF THE WORLD LEADERS… CHURCHILL ETC… ALL BOUND TOGETHER SUCH THAT IF ONE DOES SOMETHING AN UNCONTROLLABLE CHAIN REACTION OCCURS…. IN WHAT WAY… COULD YOU WRITE UP A PIECE TODAY… OF CURRENT LEADERS… AND A SENSE IN WHICH INERTIA, AS A DEPTH OF CHARACTER…BUT CHARACTER THAT MOVES… INFRASTRUCTURAL SKIRTS…. SKIRTS OF INFRASTRUCTURE…. INERTIA IS NOW A RETARDATION OR SLOWING OF DECISIONAL NEXUS… IT IS BECOME DYNAMITE… DESTROYER OF BONDS…. WORLDVIEWS…inertia… belief…
LONDONGRAD….. PUTIN… VETERANS…. WASHED UP…. Embezzled money through cyprus…
THREE WORLDS…. FIRST WORLD …. SECOND WORLD… THIRD WORLD….
THREE BODY PROBLEM… INABILITY TO PREDICT THE MOVEMENTS OF THE BODIES…LEADS TO AGGRESSION…. THREE BODY PROBLEM AS IT PERTAINS TO LONDON…. WORLD-SYSTEMS THEORY BUT OF THREE DIFFERENT AREAS OF LONDON?
Wang sees people playing a sophisticated virtual-reality video game called Three Body (which was created by the ETO as a recruitment tool) and begins to play himself. The video game portrays a planet whose climate randomly flips between Stable and Chaotic Eras. During Chaotic Eras, the weather oscillates unpredictably between extreme cold and extreme heat, sometimes within minutes. The inhabitants (who are represented as having human bodies) seek ways to predict Chaotic Eras so they can better survive. Unlike humans, they have evolved the special ability to drain themselves of water, turning into a roll of canvas, in order to lie dormant when the Chaotic Eras occur, requiring another person to re-hydrate them. Characters resembling Aristotle, Mozi, Newton, and others try and fail to model the climate as multiple civilizations grow and are wiped out by large-scale disasters. Wang wins acclaim by figuring out how the climate works: (1) the planet Trisolaris has three suns, (2) the suns have different kinds of compositions, and when they are far away from the planet’s surface only the core of the sun can penetrate to the surface, appearing in the sky as a flying star, (3) Stable Eras occur when two suns are far away, and Trisolaris orbits the third, (4) Chaotic Eras occur when Trisolaris is pulled by more than one sun, (5) firestorms happen when two or three suns are close to the planet’s surface, (6) seeing three flying stars causes intense cold because it means all three suns are far away, and (7) eventually the three suns will line up and Trisolaris will plunge into the nearest one and be consumed.
Londongrad as outer satelitte pole of Eurasia for launder + trans-Atlantia dollar conversion is the Corpus Callosum between Two Hemispheres
China (spatial and synthetic)
U.S. (analytic and sequential)
Each composed with the three dimensions of their respective oceanic-continental-space bearing souls.
Oceania, Eurasia, Eastasia of Winston’s.
On the story.. of a satellite colliding, burning up in the atmosphere falling out
Two men meet in the desert…. Freight trains running through the middle of the heads…
trauma…. Imaginal exposure therapy….
Sense of depth but above…
Stepping out of the building, feeling the might of the city awn down the river, the grass opening
Jean Baudrillard Cool Memories V page 13
Intelligence lies in deceleration. But you must first get ahead of things.
Around noon, a gathering darkness, as though it had welled up from the earth itself, not come down from the sky. As though produced by a source of black light, its beam sweeping across the earth at 2000 kilometres per hour. The wind of the esclipese gets up in the gloom. It’s the same silent wind as comes with storms. And cold descends from the solar corona. Path of totality.
Just as there is no ‘objective’ existence of the sky’s blueness (blue is blue and that’s all there is to it), so there is nothing objectively knowable about the movements of the soul. They can only be intuited: psychological azure.
Description of the beam…. The way the city moves underneath… a sensibility to a city turning over…
Note the article in the FT re: manufacturing / how the steel industry remains in our conscience… even though it is less effective as a material strata…
The neuro-image at work over our psyches in Brexit…. Neo-cortical warfare… battle behind the eyes…
Much has been made of why people are left behind from rising boats, is due to an economy being liberalised… leading to competition from cheaper wage labour abroad… a horizontal effect
But there is a deep telluric influence, that of technological changes outpacing the skills of the workforce that exist within it…
There needs to be a party that redefines the idea of a dependency state… how the left is seen as wasteful of money…. For instance creating opportunity for all, there needs to be a more fundamental restructuring in our mindset as to what infrastructure is… it is movement, it is life-affirming gesture not dependency…we are on a beam…
IT IS WRONG TO ALWAYS ASSOCIATE INERTIA WITH INACTIVITY … inertia lies at the heart of our decisional movements/momentums.
ALSO REMEMBER FOCUSING ON INERTIA in RELATION TO A STRATA OF LAND … it is in drone age cinema thet we are described as existing on a modulation….
Modern Slothrop…. But also see Crashed Tooze re: China’s investment in heavy strata, Hebei etc. as inertia, where asset bubbles are in fact inertia’s of spirit and material, outspinning themselves when the plates have moved
Need to remember that it is in the subterraneous dimensions of financing, lending/borrowing that power structures
THE SURFACE OF THE GROUND AS OPTICAL // AS A RETINAL SURFACE WITH WHICH WE SEE THROUGH… SO IN MAPPING THE CHANGES IN THE BUILT FORM, we are tracing the lifeworld of an individual in it, we might speculate how they see the world out from…
The old fault lines of geopolitics have become unstable again. Both Russian and Chinese military vessels and aircraft are now frequently engaged in near misses and close confrontations with those of the United States and its allies. Allegations of nuclear missile launches, even if involving only unarmed missiles, remind us that nuclear and conventional weapons treaties that took a generation to negotiate can be violated or obliterated in the 2 to 60 minutes it takes an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) to reach its target.” GEOPOLITICS AS THE FRICTION BETWEEN TWO JETS, GEOPOLITICS AS VELOCITY… Pippa malmgren…
…a crazy man who works in a room alone… he drops a pin on a satellite image.. then imagines everything he can of someone living there looking out, he collects reports of local towns, what industry in the area, the employment, the birth rate, the death rate, love, loss youtube Baidu telegram..etc.etc.
Imagining what it is like to live in this retinal lake… of concrete… of ….
Lived realities of the everyday, sussed from the depth of a satellite, petri phenomenology.
There is something powerful in satellite images over years, it is perspective where time/space are understood, processes of deindustrialisation…etc. are seen / seeing is believing … how can satellites show you the divide between individuals….e.g. where do the politicians live… where did they grow up…. Relative to others… an individual is not just an interior, an individual carries with them the landscapes, scopes they grew up in…. As if many figurines, dancing with buildings growing outside of them… evolving alongside…. Need to explore writing styles a la Thomas Pynchon…. How the individual evolves up the longitude, they carry latitudes with them…
There’s something beautiful and something sparse about the satellite…. How his dad travelled across..
Perhaps it is to do with time… the way time emanates from objects… the way fragments of landscape are sucked in and framed around the vortices of a project…. A gravitational model of movement…. So when you have videographer content..of travelling the desert steppes etc… this all deforms into the saturnalia of Alat…
It is retinal landscape… behind the eyes…
Montage method…. Of Anaklia promotional video…. Of the minister answering claims of corruption in the TBC …. Of Russia bombing a town nearby in 1990s…. All of it following from the other…. A sort of ambient disorienting dynamic…
Inertia in the reference of maps we use… e.g. Georgia … inertial optics of Russia’s looming presence etc…
The way the built form is a retina… an inertial retina… soviet walls…
Where you have one. Mining the past…. Videos from university…etc. etc.
And you have a section of videos from the trip in China …. This kind of freudian depth charge… of the optical baggage…. The dance of Inertia’s freight in logistics of perception…
It goes back to the idea of two telescopes, one vying into a depth…
One casting out…
The two men meeting to negotiate…. Carrying entire cities, optical freight trains on their back shot through….
There is an overt focus in all ethnography of drilling into a site… its people…its complexity as verticality… less on the transience of the encounter… there is some content in the motorways of system 2 – in the motion past… in airports by night, faces you’ll never meet again… seed dispersions in metallic jet cocks..
The self-evidence of our present perception does not stand the test of time. Our memory plays tricks on us. It is becoming increasingly accepted that a memory is not reproduced. Rather, it is regenerated. A memory is always an event, never a representation. The event of memory varies according to the conditions under which it is produced. Personal memory is an evolving dynamic system that is predicated not on reproduction but on re-creation.
The suppleness of sensation we acquire through habituation is continuous with the suppleness acquired by material objects: a dress folds more easily once a crease is set; a river runs in the banks it established in the last storm; a key turns in the lock with more ease on its three-hundredth turn than on its first turn; a violin absorbs into its interior a way of handling consistent with the musician’s level of skill;7 and the quality of the instrument’s musical habituation partially determines its value to the next buyer. Like the body of the violin, the tissue of the brain can acquire varying levels of sensory acuity.
James pictures the formation of habits of perception as they occur at the neuronal level. The key word linked to “habit” is “plasticity,” which he defines as structures “weak enough to yield to an influence, but strong enough not to yield all at once. (page 77)
Neuronal settling in // navigating the neural tissue of the Silk Roads – places, names, routes, colours, shapes, distances becoming intimate
Each generation bears the burden of acquitting itself of the indictment of reality.
INERTIA is THE SAME DYNAMIC AS MOTIVATED COGNITION: “experience tends to remove the sting of fear that those who are unfamiliar with such conditions might otherwise feel.
Dan Kahan refers to this as “motivated cognition.”70 It describes the social and cultural construction of perception. To a significant degree, we tend to see what we expect to see, and our expectations are the result of experience, memory, and the various cultural and cognitive models that we carry around in our heads to help us make sense of what we see and hear and feel in everyday life. Images do not speak for themselves; what we bring to them help give them voice.”
Law’s entanglekents are entanglements all the way down – against a backdrop of what Christopher Bollas calls the “silent radiant intelligence” of the mind’s attunement to the real.89 In every situated conflict the deci- sion maker’s “evenly suspended attention” mines fragments in sear
I think you could do a coordinates a blip.land re: the coordinates of your house KT18 5RN …. And have the satellite image… trace a journey up the 16mile train from Tattenham to Goldsmiths…
And write a script…. Film scrolling through google earth on room wall, interspersed with dialogue….
Or write in a Pynchonesque style… the ground changing underneath.. all the dimensions …
You could almost have a novel…written as if someone who is fixated by each coordinates visited… by the change… a maddening chase through his labyrinthine own memory a la Umbrella…Will Self…
Worldview //. Reform of the Chinese psyche is the key dimension of the BRI.
I think video and text etc. is actually quite a novel means to screenwrite…. Allows to make allusions… and to carry the text on..
The Inertia / the Smear in Legal Courts…See Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror (2018)
Imagine a dispute at one of the project quarters – litigants vs. The Chinese Constructors …. ‘A freight train running through the middle of my head…’. What retinal landscapes, the images of home, folding Beijing, the climbing scrapers, the rivers, the project quotas… etc..etc…. Shot through, the noise light amidst the cranes, the tear ducts of a falling sun…. The smear….
This also relates to the courtroom… to the inertias of the jury brought in…. To the belief systems that are already there… the smear…. And this smear as a geographical conditional…
A necessity for a cinema of introversion, or one less on divulging the contents of the screen, than the perception of the contents of the screen, the smear of inertias you smack up against the screen, that bleed into the edges beside pixels… the fusion…
I is certainly something missing from IR discussions… inertia … we consign the Chinese century of humiliation to the past, but the past is present affective, like a freight train running through the middle of my head…. inertias…
Need new modes of writing history as present-affective… e.g. Pynchon as the missile of an economy descriptor… Soviet architecture… Soviet walls… Soviet images…Soviet roads…. All freight training through the head ….
Could you set up an imaginary account of a legal dispute… which goes to the Court of Abitration in Astana…. Re: visual evidence… what degrees of information/evidence would the case theoretically construct?
The purpose of this film is like a missile…an ideological bullet enfolding retinal landscapes of immense depth, relief, etc.. geoengineering / retinal engineering // and this is at the heart of Xi Jinping’s efforts to reform the mind of the Chinese individual…neocortical moulding..the unspoken agenda in Xinjiang
Xi Jinping’s Chinese dream – trying to escape the straitjacket of historical materialist decades… The baroque has a mood and mindset of its own; it is made up of recurring visual tropes and storylines. The characteristic markers of the baroque include: the mirror, the labyrinth, the proliferation of fragments, the field of ruins, the spectacle, the dream – and of course the dream within a dream (ad infinitum)… to stimulate the economy as that of thinkers… savants rescued from the wake of fabricants…
In the context of our present pervasive madness that we call normality, sanity, freedom, all our frames of reference are ambiguous and equivocal.
A man who prefers to be dead rather than Red is normal. A man who says he has lost his soul is mad. A man who says that men are machines may be a great scientist. A man who says he is a machine Is ‘depersonalized’ in psychiatric jargon.
A little girl of seventeen in a mental hospital told me she was terrified because the Atom Bomb was inside her. That is a delusion. The statesmen of the world who boast and threaten that they have Doomsday weapons are far more dangerous and far more estranged from ‘reality’ than many of the people on whom the label ‘psychotic’ is affixed.
re: speed, what world is a missile born into… war on terror… see the wikipedia current event, 20 nov 2015… a missile syncs into the rhythm of its day… the soldiers standing as the fireworks explode overhead… swooning under the Caspian moon… image underworld… after the atom bomb, how when the cold war ended, we lost sense of orientation … image underworld, remember Delillo’s description of the atom bomb page…. you could then later…begin experimenting with testimony conducted with a projector, retinal memory room… as an encounter, through which to locate, the inertia of the launch , Russia’s militarism in media as an inertia… look up inertia in relation to missile projection…trajectory… 25 million… Lucy Prebble Monologue… a thought experiment… were I a Russian soldier having just been to the navy day fireworks, watching RT, Ruptly frequently… how would I see the world…. we are always in the wake of a synthetic memory … of the missile images glittering across our eyeballs… we follow them blindly… always in the wake of a streaking moment of metal across the sky….
I am become missile
“8 NOVEMBER YEAR OF THE DEPEND ADULT UNDERGARMENT
INTERDEPENDENCE DAY
GAUDEAMUS IGITUR
Every year at E.T.A., maybe a dozen of the kids between maybe like twelve and fifteen — children in the very earliest stages of puberty and really abstract-capable thought, when one’s allergy to the confining realities of the present is just starting to emerge as weird kind of nostalgia for stuff you never even knew[120] — maybe a dozen of these kids, mostly male, get fanatically devoted to a homemade Academy game called Eschaton. Eschaton is the most complicated children’s game anybody around E.T.A.’d ever heard of. No one’s entirely sure who brought it to Enfield from where. But you can pretty easily date its conception from the mechanics of the game itself. Its basic structure had already pretty much coalesced when Allston’s Michael Pemulis hit age twelve and helped make it way more compelling. Its elegant complexity, combined with a dismissive-reenactment frisson and a complete disassociation from the realities of the present, composes most of its puerile appeal. Plus it’s almost addictively compelling, and shocks the tall.”
“This year it’s been Otis P. Lord, a thirteen-year-old baseliner and calculus phenom from Wilmington DE, who ‘Wears the Beanie’ as Eschaton’s game-master and statistician of record, though Pemulis, ”
“since he’s still around and is far and away the greatest Eschaton player in E.T.A. history, has a kind of unofficial emeritus power of correction over Lord’s calculations and mandate.
Eschaton takes eight to twelve people to play, w/ 400 tennis balls so dead and bald they can’t even be used for service drills anymore, plus an open expanse equal to the area of four contiguous tennis courts, plus a head for data-retrieval and coldly logical cognition, along with at least 40 megabytes of available RAM and wide array of tennis paraphernalia. The vade-mecumish rulebook that Pemulis in Y.P.W. got Hal Incandenza to write — with appendices and sample c:\Pink2\Mathpak\EndStat-path Decision-Tree diagrams and an offset of the most accessible essay Pemulis could find on applied game theory — is about as long and interesting as J. Bunyan’s stupefying Pilgrim’s Progress from This World to That Which Is to Come, and a pretty tough nut to compress into anything lively (although every year a dozen more E.T.A. kids memorize the thing at such a fanatical depth that they sometimes report reciting mumbled passages under light dental or cosmetic anesthesia, years later). But if Hal had a Luger pointed at him and were under compulsion to try, he’d probably start by explaining that each of the 400 dead tennis balls in the game’s global arsenal represents a 5-mega-ton thermonuclear warhead. Of the total number of a given day’s players,[121] three compose a theoretical Anschluss designated AMNAT, another three SOVWAR, one or two REDCHI, another one or two the wacko but always pesky LIBSYR or more formidable IRLIBSYR, and that the day’s remaining players, depending on involved random considerations, can form anything from SOUTHAF to INDPAK to like an independent cell of Nuck insurgents with a 50-click Howitzer and big ideas. Each team is called a Combatant. On the open expanse of contiguous courts, Combatants are arrayed in positions corresponding to their location on the planet earth as represented in The Rand McNally Slightly Rectangular Hanging Map of the World.[122]Practical distribution of total megatonnage requires a working knowledge of the Mean-Value Theorem for Integrals,[123] but for Hal’s synoptic purposes here it’s enough to say that megatonnage is distributed among Combatants according to an integrally regressed ratio of (a) Combatant’s yearly military budget as percentage of Combatant’s yearly GNP to (b) the inverse of stratego-tactical expenditures as percentage of Combatant’s yearly military budget. In quainter days, Combatants’ balls were simply doled out by throws of shiny red Yahtzee-dice. Quaint chance is no longer required, because Pemulis has downloaded Mathpak Unltd.’s elegant EndStat “stats-cruncher software into the late James Incandenza’s fearsome idle drop-clothed D.E.C. 2100, and has shown Otis P. Lord how to dicky the lock to Schtitt’s office at night with a dining-hall meal card and plug the D.E.C. into a three-prong that’s under the lower left corner of the enormous print of Dürer’s ‘The Magnificent Beast’ on the wall by the relevant edge of Schtitt’s big glass desk, so Schtitt or deLint won’t even know it’s on, when it’s on, then link it by cellular modem to a slick Yushityu portable with color monitor out on the courts’ nuclear theater. AMNAT and SOVWAR usually end up with about 400 total megatons each, with the rest inconsistently divided. It’s possible to complicate Pemulis’s Mean-Value equation for distribution by factoring in stuff like historical incidences of bellicosity and appeasement, unique characteristics of perceived national interests, etc., but Lord, the son of not one but two bankers, is a straight bang-for-buck type of apportíoner, a stance the equally bottom-line-minded Michael Pemulis endorses with both thumbs. Pieces of tennis gear are carefully placed within each Combatant’s territories to mirror and map strategic targets. Folded gray-on-red E.T.A. T-shirts are MAMAs —
“Major Metro Areas. Towels stolen from selected motels on the junior tour stand for airfields, bridges, satellite-linked monitoring facilities, carrier groups, conventional power plants, important rail convergences. Red tennis shorts with gray trim are CONFORCONs — Conventional-Force Concentrations. The black cotton E.T.A. armbands — for when God forbid there’s a death — designate the noncontemporary game-era’s atomic power plants, uranium-/ plutonium-enrichment facilities, gaseous diffusion plants, breeder reactors, initiator factories, neutron-scattering-reflector labs, tritium-production reactor vessels, heavy-water plants, semiprivate shaped-charge concerns, linear accelerators, and the especially point-heavy Annular Fusion research laboratories in North Syracuse NNY and Presque Isle ME, Chyonskrg Kurgistan and Pliscu Romania, and possibly elsewhere. Red shorts with gray trim (few in number because strongly disliked by the travelling squads) are SSTRACs — equally low-number but point-intensive Sites of Strategic Command. Socks are either missile installations or antimissile installations or isolated silo-clusters or Cruise-capable B2 or SS5 squadrons — let’s draw the curtain of charity across any more MILABBREVs — depending on whether they’re boys’ tennis socks or boys’ street-shoe socks or girls’ tennis socks with the little bunny-tail at the heel or girls’ tennis socks w/o the bunny-tail. Toe-worn cast-off corporate-supplied sneakers sit open-mouthed and serenely lethal, strongly suggesting the subs they stand for.
In the game, Combatants’ 5-megaton warheads can be launched only with hand-held tennis racquets. Hence the requirement of actual physical targeting-skill that separates Eschaton from rotisserie-league holocaust games played with protractors and PCs around kitchen tables. The paraboloid transcontinental flight of a liquid-fuel strategic delivery vehicle closely resembles a topspin lob. One reason the E.T.A. administration and staff unofficially permit Eschaton to absorb students’ attention and commitment might be that the game’s devotees tend to develop terrific lobs. Pemulis’s lobs can nail a coin on the baseline two out of three times off either side, is why it’s idiotic that he rushes the net so much instead of letting the other guy come in more. Warheads can be launched independently or packed into an intricately knotted athletic supporter designed to open out in midflight and release Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicles — MIRVs. MIRVs, being a profligate use of a Combatant’s available megatonnage, tend to get used only if a game of Eschaton metastasizes from a controlled set of Spasm Exchanges — SPASEX — to an all-out apocalyptic series of punishing Strikes Against Civilian Populations — SACPOP. Few Combatants will go to SACPOP unless compelled by the remorseless logic of game theory, since SACPOP-exchanges usually end up costing both Combatants so many points they’re eliminated from further contention. A given Es-chaton’s winning team is simply that Combatant with the most favorable ratio of points for INDDIR — Infliction of Death, Destruction, and Inca-pacitation of Response — to SUFDDIR — self-evident — though the assignment of point-values for each Combatant’s shirts, towels, shorts, armbands, socks, and shoes is statistically icky, plus there are also wildly involved corrections for initial megatonnage, population density, Land-Sea-Air delivery distributions, and EM-pulse-resistant civil-defense expenditures, so that the official victor takes three hours of EndStat number-crunching and at least four Motrin for Otis P. Lord to confirm.
Another reason why each year’s master statistician has to be a special combination of tech-wonk and compulsive is that the baroque apparatus of each Eschaton has to be worked out in advance and then sold to a kind of immature and easily bored community of world leaders. A quorum of the day’s Combatants has to endorse a particular simulated World Situation as Lord’s stayed up well past several bedtimes to develop it: Land-Sea-Air force-distributions; ethnic, sociologic, economic, and even religious demographics for each Combatant, plus broadly sketched psych-profiles of all relevant heads of state; prevailing weather in all the map’s quadrants; etc. Then everybody playing that day is assigned to a Combatant’s team, and they all sit down over purified water and unfatted chips to hash out between Combatants stuff like mutual-defense alliances, humane-war pacts, facilities for inter-Combatant communication, DEFCON-gradients, city-trading, and so on. Since each Combatant’s team knows only their own Situation-profile and total available megatonnage — and since even out in the four-court theater the stockpiled warheads are hidden from view inside the identical white plastic cast-off industrial-solvent buckets all academies and serious players use for drill-balls[125] — there can be a lot of poker-facing about response-resolve, willingness to go SACPOP, nonnegotiable interests, EM-pulse-immunity, distribution of strategic forces, and commitment to geopolitical ideals. You should have seen Michael Pemulis just about eat the whole world alive during pre-Eschaton summits, back when he played. His teams won most games before the first lob landed.”
What often takes the longest to get a quorum on is each game’s Triggering Situation. Here Lord, like many stellar statistics-wonks, shows a bit of an Achilles’ heel imagination-wise, but he’s got a good five or six years of Eschaton precedents to draw on. A Russo-Chinese border dispute goes tactical over Sinkiang. An AMNAT computracker in the Aleutians misreads a flight of geese as three SOVWAR SSios on reentry. Israel moves armored divisions north and east through Jordan after an El Al airbus is bombed in midflight by a cell linked to both H’sseins. Black Albertan wackos infiltrate an isolated silo at Ft. Chimo and get two MIRVs through SOUTHAF’s defense net. North Korea invades South Korea. Vice versa. AMNAT is within 72 hours of putting an impregnable string of antimissile satellites on line, and the remorseless logic of game theory compels SOVWAR to go SACPOP while it still has the chance.
“On Interdependence Day, Sunday 11/8, game-master Lord’s Triggering Situation unwinds nicely, on Pemulis’s view. Explosions of suspicious origin occur at AMNAT satellite-receiver stations from Turkey to Labrador as three high-level Canadian defense ministers vanish and then a couple of days later are photographed at a Volgograd bistro hoisting shots of Stolichnaya with Slavic bimbos on their knee.[126] Then two SOVWAR trawlers just inside international waters off Washington are strafed by Fi6s on patrol out of Cape Flattery Naval Base. Both AMNAT and SOVWAR go from DEFCON 2 to DEFCON 4. REDCHI goes to DEFCON 3, in response to which SOVWAR airfields and antimissile networks from Irkutsk to the Dzhugdzhur Range go to DEFCON 5, in response to which AMNAT-SAC bombers and antimissile-missile silos in Nebraska and South Dakota and Saskatchewan and eastern Spain assume a Maximum Readiness posture. SOVWAR’s bald and port-wine-stained premier calls AMNAT’s wattle-chinned[127] president on the Hot Line and asks him if he’s got Prince Albert in a can.”
“Another pretty shady explosion levels a SOVWAR Big Ear monitoring station on Sakhalin. General Atomic Inc.’s gaseous diffusion uranium-enrichment facility in Portsmouth OH reports four kilograms of enriched uranium hexafluoride missing and then suffers a cataclysmic fire that forces evacuation of six downwind counties. An AMNAT minesweeper of the Sixth Fleet on maneuvers in the Red Sea is hit and sunk with REDCHI Silkworm torpedoes fired by “LIBSYR MiG25s. Italy, in an apparently bizarre EndStat-generated development Otis P. Lord will only smile enigmatically about, invades Albania. SOVWAR goes apeshit. Apoplectic premier rings AMNAT’s president, only to be asked if his refrigerator’s running. LIBSYR shocks the Christian world by air-bursting a half-megaton device two clicks over Tel Aviv, causing deaths in the low six figures. Everybody and his brother goes to DEFCON 5. Air Force One leaves the ground. SOUTHAF and REDCHI announce neutrality and plead for cool heads. Israeli armored columns behind heavy tactical-artillery saturation push into Syria all the way to Abu Kenal in twelve hours: Damascus has firestorms; En Nebk is reportedly just plain gone. Several repressive right-wing regimes in the Third World suffer coups d’etat and are replaced by repressive left-wing regimes. Tehran and Baghdad announce full dip-mil support of LIBSYR, thus reconstituting LIBSYR as IRLIBSYR. AMNAT and SOVWAR activate all civil defense personnel and armed forces reserves and commence evacuation of selected MAMAs.”
“IRLIBSYR is today represented by Evan Ingersoll, whom Axford keeps growling at under his breath, Hal can hear. A shifty-eyed member of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff vanishes and isn’t photographed anywhere. Albania sues for terms. Crude and apparently amateur devices in the low-kiloton range explode across Israel from Haifa to Ash-qelon. Tripoli is incommunicado after at least four thermonuclear explosions cause second-degree burns as far away as Médenine Tunisia. A 10-kiloton tactical-artillery device air-bursts over the Command Center of the Czech 3rd Army in Ostrava, resulting in what one Pentagon analyst calls ‘a serious wienie roast.’ Despite the fact that nobody but SOVWAR itself has anybody close enough to hit Ostrava from Howitzer-distance, SOVWAR stonewalls AMNAT’s denials and regrets. AMNAT’s president tries ringing SOVWAR’s premier from the air and gets only the premier’s answering machine. ”
“AMNAT is unable to determine whether the string of explosions at its radar installations all along the Arctic Circle are conventional or tactical. CIA/NSA reports that 64% of the civilian populations of SOVWAR’s MAMAs have been successfully relocated below ground in hardened shelters. AMNAT orders evacuation of all MAMAs. SOVWAR MiG25s engage REDCHI aircraft over seas off Tientsin. Air Force Two tries to leave the ground and gets a flat tire. A single one-megaton SS10 evades antimissile missiles and detonates just over Provo UT, from which all communications abruptly cease. Eschaton’s game-master now posits — but does not go so far as to actually assert — that EndStat’s game-theoretic Decision Tree now dictates a SPASEX response from AMNAT.”
“Uninitiated adults who might be parked in a nearby mint-green advertorial Ford sedan or might stroll casually past E.T.A.’s four easternmost tennis courts and see an atavistic global-nuclear-conflict game played by tanned and energetic little kids and so this might naturally expect to see fuzzless green warheads getting whacked indiscriminately skyward all over the place as everybody gets blackly drunk with thanatoptic fury in the crisp November air — these adults would more likely find an actual game of Es-chaton strangely subdued, almost narcotized-looking. Your standard round of Eschaton moves at about the pace of chess between adepts. For these devotees become, on court, almost parodically adult — staid, sober, humane, and judicious twelve-year-old world leaders, trying their best not to let the awesome weight of their responsibilities — responsibilities to nation, globe, rationality, ideology, conscience and history, to both the living and the unborn — not to let the terrible agony they feel at the arrival of this day — this dark day the leaders’ve prayed would never come and have taken every conceivable measure rationally consistent with national strategic interest to avoid, to prevent — not to let the agonizing weight of responsibility compromise their resolve to do what they must to preserve their people’s way of life. So they play, logically, cautiously, so earnest and deliberate in their calculations they appear thoroughly and queerly adult, almost Talmudic, from a distance. A couple gulls fly overhead. A mint-green Ford sedan has passed through the gate’s raised portcullis and is trying to parallel park between two dumpsters in the circular drive behind West House, which is behind and to the neck-straining left of the Gatorade pavilion. There’s an autumnal tang to the air and a brittle gray shell of cloud-cover, plus the constant faraway hum of Sunstrand Plaza’s ATHSCME fan-line.”
Strategic acumen and feel for realism vary from kid to kid, of course. When IRLIBSYR’s Evan Ingersoll starts lobbing warheads at SOVWAR’s belt of Third-Wave reserve silos in the Kazakh, and it becomes pretty clear that AMNAT has won IRLIBSYR to its side by making sinister promises about the ultimate disposition of Israel, Israel, even though nobody’s Israel out there today, seems in a fit of pique to have somehow persuaded SOUTHAF, who today is Brooklyn NY’s little hard-ass Josh Gopnik — the same Josh Gopnik who by the way subscribes to Commentary — to expend all sixteen of its green fuzzy warheads in a debilitating enfilade against AMNAT dams, bridges, and bases from Florida to Baja. Everybody involved orders total displacement of MAMA populations. Then, without any calculation whatever, INDPAK, who today is J. J. Penn — a high-ranked thirteen-year-old but not exactly the brightest log on the Yuletide fire — dumps three poorly tied jockstraps’ worth of MIRVs on Israel, landing most of the megatonnage in sub-Beersheba desert areas that didn’t look much different before the blasts. When roundly kibitzed from the shelter of the Gatorade pavilion under Schtitt’s tower by Troeltsch, Axford, and Incandenza, Penn shrilly reminds them that Pakistan is a Muslim state and sworn foe to all infidelic enemies of Islam, but can do little but fiddle with the strings of his launcher when Pemulis cheerfully reminds him that nobody’s Israel today and there isn’t so much as a Combatant’s sock on that part of the courts. It is not a matter of the principle of thing, ever, in Es-chaton.”
Except for the SOUTHAF flurry and INDPAK boner, 11/8’s game proceeds with much probity and cold deliberation, with even more pauses and hushed, chin-stroking conferences today than tend to be the norm. The only harried-looking person on the 1300-m.2 map is Otis P. Lord, who has to keep legging it from one continent to another, pushing a rolling double-shelf stainless steel food cart purloined from St. John of God Hospital with a blinking Yushityu portable on one shelf and a 256-capacity diskette case about two-thirds full on the other, the shelves’ sides hung with clattering clipboards, Lord having to dramatize manually the effortless dictates of real logic and necessity, verifying that command decisions are allowable functions of situation and capacity (he’d shrugged his shoulders in a neutral Whatever at SOUTHAF and INDPAK), locating necessary data for subterranean premiers and dictators and airsick presidents, removing vaporized articles of clothing from sites of devastating hits and just woppsing them up or folding them over at the sites of near-hits and fizzle yields, triangulating EM-pulse estimates from confirmed hits to authorize or deny communication-capacity, it’s a nerve-racking job, he’s more or less having to play God, tallying kill-ratios and radiation-levels and parameters of fallout, strontium-90 and iodine levels and the likelihood of conflagrations v. firestorms in MAMAs with different Mean-Value skyscraper-heights and combustible-capital indices. Despite chapped hands and a badly running nose, Lord’s response-“time to requests for data is impressive, thanks mainly to the sly D.E.C. hookup and the detailed decision-algorithm files Pemulis had authored three years back. Otis P. Lord informs SOVWAR and AM-NAT that Peoria IL’s topographic flatness ups the effective kill-radius for SOVWAR’s 5-megaton direct hit to 10.1 clicks, meaning half of this MAMA-POP burns to death in evacuatory traffic jams out on Interstate 74. An AMNAT Minuteman can hold an absolute maximum of eight MIRVs irregardless of whether the titanic jockstrap little LaMont Chu promoted out of the sedated Teddy Schacht’s gear bag on the bus Friday night can hold thirteen dead tennis balls. Given standard climatic conditions, the fire area from an air-burst will be 2ir times larger than the blast area. Toronto has enough sub-code skyscrapers within its total area to guarantee a firestorm off a minimum of two strikes within
_______2n__________
(1 / total Toronto area in m.2)
of target center. Five megatons of heavy-hydrogen fusion yields at least 1,400,000 curies worth of strontium-^o, meaning microcephalic kids in Montreal for roughly twenty-two generations, and yes wiseacre McKenna of AMNAT the world will probably notice the difference. Struck and Trevor Axford hoot loudly from under the green GATORADE THIRST AID awning of the open-air pavilion outside the fence along the south side of the East Courts, where (the pavilion) they and Michael Pemulis and Jim Troeltsch and Hal Incandenza are splayed on reticulate-mesh patio chairs in street clothes and with their street-sneakers up on reticulate-mesh footstools, Struck and Axford with suspiciously bracing Gatorades and what looks like a hand-rolled psychochemical cigarette of some sort being passed between them. 11/8 is an E.T.A. day of mandatory total R&R, though the public intoxicants are a bit much. Pemulis has a bag of red-skinned peanuts he hasn’t eaten much of. Trevor Axford has overinhaled from the cigarette and is hunched coughing, his forehead purple. Hal Incandenza is squeezing a tennis ball and leaning out far to starboard to spit into a NASA glass on the ground and struggling with a strong desire to get high again for the second time since breakfast v. a strong distaste about smoking dope with/in front of all these others, especially out in the open in front of Little Buddies, which seems to him to violate some sort of issue of taste that he struggles to articulate satisfactorily to himself. A tooth way back on the upper left is twinging electrically in the cold air. Pemulis, “Pemulis, though from his twitchy right eye he’s clearly had recent recourse to some Tenuate (which helps explain the uneaten nuts), is currently abstaining and sitting on his hands for warmth, peanuts on the floor well away from Hal’s NASA glass. The pavilion is open on all sides and compliments of Stokely-van Camp Corp. and little more than like a big fancy tent with a green felt cover over the expanse’s real grass and white-iron patio furniture with reticulate plastic mesh; it’s mostly used for civilians’ spectation during exhibition matches on the East Show Courts 7, 8, 9; sometimes E.T.A.s cluster under it during drill-breaks in the summer in the heat of the day. The green awning gets taken down when they go into the Lung for the winter. Eschaton traditionally commandeers Courts 6-9, the really nice East Courts, unless there’s legit tennis going on. All the upperclass spectators except Jim Struck are former Eschaton devotees, though Hal and Troeltsch were both marginal. Troeltsch, who’s also pretty clearly had some Tenuate, is left-eye-nystagmic and is calling the action into a disconnected broadcast-headset, but Eschaton’s tough to enliven, verbally, even for the stimulated. Being generally too slow and cerebral.”
Struck is telling Axford to put his hands over his head and Pemulis is telling Axford to hold his breath. Now, in a stress-heightened voice, Otis P. Lord says he needs Pemulis to real quick come zip inside through the Cyclone-fence gate south of Court 12 and walk across the theater’s four-court map to show Lord how to access the EndStat calculation that every thousand Roentgens of straight X and gamma produces 6.36 deaths per hundred POP and for the other 93.64 means reduced lifespans of
(Total R – 100) (.0636(Total R-100)2)
years, meaning nobody’s exactly going to have to be pricing dentures in Minsk, so to speak, in the future. And so on. After about half the planet’s extant megatonnage has been expended, things are looking pretty good for the AMNAT crew. Even though they and SOVWAR are SPASEXing back and forth with chilling accuracy — SOVWAR’s designated launcher is the butch and suspiciously muscular Ann Kittenplan (who at twelve-and-a-half looks like a Belorussian shot-putter and has to buy urine more than quarter-annually and has a way more lush and impressive mustache than for instance Hal himself could raise, and who gets these terrible rages) but so Kittenplan’s landed nothing worse than an indirect hit all afternoon, while AMNAT’s launchman is Todd (‘Postal Weight’) Possalthwaite, an endomorphic thirteen-year-old from Edina MN whose whole infuriating tennis-game consists of nothing but kick serves and topspin lobs, and who’s been the Eschaton MVL[128] for the last two years, and accuracy-wise has to be seen to be believed — still, both sides have artfully avoided the escalation to SACPOP that often takes both super-Combatants right out of the game; and AMNAT’s president LaMont Chu has used the excuse of Gopnik’s emotional strikes against the U.S. South, plus Penn’s arational lobbing at an Israel that at the summit was explicitly placed under AMNAT’s mutual-defense umbrella, has used these as golden tactical geese, racking up serious INDDIR-points against a SOUTHAF and INDPAK whose hasty defensive alliance and shaky aim produce nothing more than a lot of irradiated cod off Gloucester. Whenever there’s a direct hit, Troeltsch sits up straight and gets to use the exclamation he’s hit on for a kind of announcerial trademark: ‘Ho-/y CROW!’ But SOVWAR, beset from two vectors by AMNAT and IRLIBSYR (whose occasional lob Israel’s way AMNAT, drawing a storm of diplomatic protest from SOUTHAF and INDPAK, keeps instructing Lord to log as ‘regrettable mistargetings’), even with cutting-edge civil defense and EMP-resistant communications, poor old SOVWAR is absorbing such serious collateral SUFDDIR that it’s being inexorably impelled by game-theoretic logic to a position where it’s going to pretty much have no choice but to go SACPOP against AMNAT.”
Now SOVWAR premier Timmy (‘Sleepy T.P.’) Peterson petitions O. P. Lord for capacity/authorization to place a scrambled call to Air Force One. ‘Scrambled call’ means they don’t yell at each other publicly across the courts’ map; Lord has to ferry messages from one side the other, complete with inclined heads and hushed tones etc. Premier and president exchange standard formalities. Premier apologizes for the Prince Albert crack. Hal, who’s declining all public chemicals, he’s decided, has a gander at Pemulis’s rough tallies of Combatants’ INDDIR/SUFDDIR ratios so far and agrees to bet Axford a U.S. finski no way AMNAT accepts SOVWAR’s invitation to possible terms. During actionless diplomatic intervals like this, Troeltsch is reduced to saying ‘What a beautiful day for an Eschaton’ over and over and asking people for their thoughts on the game until Pemulis tells him he’s cruising to get dope-slapped. There’s pretty much nobody around: Tavis and Schtitt are off giving what are essentially recruiting-talks at indoor clubs in the west suburbs; Pemulis’d let Tall Paul Shaw take the multi-emblazoned tow truck to take Mario down to the Public Gardens to watch the public I.-Day festivities with the Bolex H64; the local kids often go home for the day; a lot of the rest like to lie in the Viewing Rooms barely moving all I. Day until the dinner gala. Lord tear-asses back and forth between Courts 6 ana 8, food cart clattering (the food cart, which Pemulis and Axford picked up from a kind of a seedy-looking orderly at SJOG hospital that Pemulis knew from Allston, has one of those crazy left front wheels that e.g. seems always to afflict only your particular grocery cart in supermarkets, and makes a hell of a clattering racket when rushed), ferrying messages which the 18-and-Under guys can tell AMNAT and SOVWAR are making deliberately oblique and obtuse so Lord has to do that much more running: God is never a particularly popular role to have to play, and Lord this fall has already been the victim of several boarding-school-type pranks too puerile even to detail. J. A. L. Struck Jr., who as usual has made a swine of himself with the suspiciously bracing cups of Gatorade, is abruptly ill all over his own lap and then sort of slumps to one side in his patio-chair with his face slack and white and doesn’t hear Pemulis’s quick analysis that Hal might as well give Axhandle the $ right now, because LaMont Chu can parse a Decision Tree with the best of them, and the D. Tree’s now indicating peace terms in whatever a D. Tree’s version of neon letters is, because the biggest priority for AMNAT right at 1515h. is to avoid having to SACPOP with SOVWAR, since if the game stops right now AMNAT’s probably won, whereas if they SACPOP with SOVWAR, trading massive infliction of INDDIR for massive body-shots of SUFDDIR, staying more or less even with each other, AM-NAT’ll still be the same number of points ahead of SOVWAR overall, but it’ll have taken such heavy SUFDDIR debits that IRLIBSYR — never forget IRLIBSYR, brilliantly if obnoxiously Imam’d today by eleven-year-old eye-browless Evan Ingersoll of Binghamton NNY — by staying out of the SACPOP-fest and lobbing sporadically at SOVWAR just often enough to rack up serious INDDIR but not quite enough to piss SOVWAR off enough to provoke the retaliatory SSlO-wave that would mean significant SUFDDIR, could well have a serious shot at overtaking AMNAT for the overall Eschaton, especially when you factored in the f(x) advantages for bellicosity and nonexistent civil defense. At some point Axford has passed the remainder of the cigarette back over toward Struck without looking to see that Struck is no longer in his chair, and Hal finds himself taking the proffered duBois “and smoking dope in public without even thinking about it or having consciously decided to go ahead. Sure enough, poor red-faced runny-nosed Lord is making way too many clattering trips between Courts 6 and 8 for it to mean anything but peace terms. Evan Ingersoll is positively strip-mining his right nostril. Finally Lord stops with the running back and forth and positions himself in the ad service box of Court 7 and loads a new diskette into the Yushityu. Struck moans something in a possibly foreign tongue. All the other upperclass spectators have scooted their chairs well away from Struck. Troeltsch extends a blood-blistered palm and rubs the tips of the hand’s fingers together at Hal, and Hal forks over the fin without handing the thin cigarette back over to Axford, somehow. Pemulis has leaned forward intently with his pointy chin in his hands; he seems completely absorbed.”
“Interdependence Day Y.D.A.U.’s Eschaton enters probably its most crucial phase. Lord, at his cart and portable TP, puts on the white beanie (n.b.: not the black or the red beanie) that signals a temporary cessation of SPASEX between two Combatants but allows all other Combatants to go on pursuing their strategic interests as they see fit. SOVWAR and AMNAT are thus pretty vulnerable right now. SOVWAR’s Premier Peterson and Air Marshal Kittenplan, carrying their white janitorial stockpile-bucket between them, walk across Europe and the Atlantic to parley with AMNAT President Chu and Supreme Commander Possalthwaite in what looks to be roughly Sierra Leone. Various territories smolder quietly. The other players are mostly standing around beating their arms against their chests to stay warm. A few hesitant white flakes appear and swirl around and melt into dark stars the moment they hit court. A couple ostensible world leaders run here and there in a rather unstatesmanlike fashion with their open mouths directed at the sky, trying to catch bits of the fall’s first snow. Yesterday it had been warmer and rained. ”
Axford speculates about whether snow will mean Schtitt might consent to inflate the Lung even before the Fundraiser two weeks hence. Struck is threatening to fall out of his chair. Pemulis, leaning forward intently, wearing his Mr. Howell yachting cap, ignores everyone. He hates to type and keeps his tallies via pencil and clipboard a la deLint. The idling Ford sedan is conspicuous for the excruciated full-color old Nunhagen Aspirin ad on the green of its right rear door. Hal and Axford are passing what looks to the Combatants like a suckerless Tootsie-Roll stick back and forth between them, and occasionally to Troeltsch. Trevor (‘The Axhandle’) Axford has a total of only three-and-a-half digits on his right hand. From West House you can hear Mrs. Clarke and the time-and-a-half holiday kitchen staff preparing the Interdependence Day gala dinner, which always includes dessert.”
Now REDCHI, itself quietly trying to rack up some unanswered INDDIR, sends a towering topspin Job into INDPAK’s quadrant, scoring what REDCHI claims is a direct hit on Karachi and what warheadless INDPAK claims is only an indirect hit on Karachi. It’s an uneasy moment: a dispute such as this would never occur in the real God’s real world, since the truth would be manifest in the actual size of the actual wienie roast in the actual Karachi. But God here is played by Otis P. Lord, and Lord is number-crunching so fiendishly at the cart’s Yushityu, trying to confirm the verisimilitude of the peace terms AMNAT and SOVWAR are hashing out, that he can’t even pretend to have seen where REDCHI’s strike against INDPAK landed w/ respect to Karachi’s T-shirt — which is admittedly kind of mashed and woppsed up, though this could be primarily from breezes and feet — and in his lapse of omniscience cannot see how he’s supposed to allocate the relevant INDDIR- and SUFDDIR-points. Troeltsch doesn’t know whether to say ‘Holy CROW!’ or not. Lord, vexed by a lapse it’s tough to see how any mortal could have avoided, appeals over to Michael Pemulis for an independent ruling; and when Pemulis gravely shakes his white-hatted head, pointing out that Lord is God and either sees or doesn’t, in Eschaton, Lord has an intense little crying fit that’s made abruptly worse when now J. J. Penn of INDPAK all of a sudden gets the idea to start claiming that now that it’s snowing the snow totally affects blast area and fire area and pulse-intensity and maybe also has fallout implications, and he says Lord has to now completely redo everybody’s damage parameters before anybody can form realistic strategies from here on out.
Pemulis’s chairlegs shriek and make red-skin peanuts spill out in a kind of cornucopic cone-shape and he’s up in his capacity as sort of eminence grise of Eschaton and ranging up and down just outside the theater’s chain-link fencing, giving J. J. Penn the very roughest imaginable side of his tongue. Besides being real sensitive to any“theater-boundary-puncturing threats to the map’s integrity — threats that’ve come up before, and that as Pemulis sees it threaten the game’s whole sense of animating realism (which realism depends on buying the artifice of 1300 m.2 of composition tennis court representing the whole rectangular projection of the planet earth) — Pemulis is also a sworn foe of all Penns for all time: it had been J. J. Penn’s much older brother Miles Penn, now twenty-one and flailing away on the grim Third-World Satellite pro tour, playing for travel-expenses in bleak dysenteric locales, who when Pemulis first arrived at E.T.A. at age eleven had christened him Michael Penisless and had had Pemulis convinced for almost a year that if he pressed on his belly-button his ass would fall off.[129]”
“It’s snowing on the goddamn map, not the territory, you dick!’ Pemulis yells at Penn, whose lower lip is out and quivering. Pemulis’s face is the face of a man who will someday need blood-pressure medication, a constitution the Tenuate doesn’t help one bit. Troeltsch is sitting up straight and speaking very intensely and quietly into his headset. Hal, who in his day never wore the beanie, and usually portrayed some marginal nation somewhere out in the nuclear boondocks, finds himself more intrigued by Penn’s map/ territory faux pas than upset by it, or even amused.
Pemulis turns back to the pavilion and seems to be looking at Hal in some kind of appeal: ‘Jaysusl”
“Except is the territory the real world, quote unquote, though!’ Axford calls across to Pemulis, who’s pacing like the fence is between him and some sort of prey. Axford knows quite well Pemulis can be fucked with when he’s like this: when he’s hot he always cools down and becomes contrite.”
“Struck tries to yell out a Kertwang on Pemulis but can’t get the megaphone he makes of his hands to fit over the mouth.
‘The real world’s what the map here stands for!’ Lord lifts his head from the Yushityu and cries over at Axhandle, trying to please Pemulis.
‘Kind of looks like real-world-type snow from here, M.P.,’ Axford calls out. His forehead’s still maroon from the coughing fit. Troeltsch is trying to describe the distinction between the symbolic map of the gear-littered courts and the global strategic theater it stands for using all and only sports-broadcast cliches. Hal looks from Axhandle to Pemulis to Lord.”
“Struck finally falls out of his chair with a clunk but his legs are still somehow entangled in the legs of the chair. It starts to snow harder, and dark stars of melt begin to multiply and then merge all over the courts. Otis Lord is trying to type and wipe his nose on his sleeve at the same time. J. Gopnik and K. McKenna are running around well outside their assigned quadrants with their tongues outstretched.
‘Real-world snow isn’t a factor if it’s falling on the fucking map!’
Ann Kittenplan’s crew-cutted head now protrudes from the kind of rugby-scrum AMNAT’s and SOVWAR’s heads of state form around Lord’s computational food cart. ‘For Christ’s sake leave us alone!’ she shrieks at Pemulis. Troeltsch is going ‘Oh, my’ into his headset. O. Lord is struggling with the cart’s protective umbrella, his head’s beanie’s little white propeller rotating in a rising wind. A light dusting of snow is starting to appear in the players’ hair.
“It’s only real-world snow if it’s already in the scenario!’ Pemulis keeps directing everything at Penn, who hasn’t said a word since his original suggestion and is busy sort of casually kicking the Karachi-shirt over into the Arabian Sea, clearly hoping the original detonation will get forgotten about in all the metatheoretical fuss. Pemulis rages along the East Courts’ western fence. The combination of several Tenuate spansules plus Eschaton-adrenaline bring his blue-collar Irish right out. He’s a muscular but fundamentally physically narrow guy: head, hands, the sharp little wad of cartilage at the tip of Pemulis’s nose — everything about him seems to Hal to taper and come to a point, like a bad El Greco. Hal leans to spit and watches him pace like a caged thing as Lord works feverishly over EndStat’s peace-terms decision-matrix. Hal wonders, not for the first time, whether he might deep down be a secret snob about collar-color issues and Pemulis, then whether the fact that he’s capable of wondering whether he’s a snob attenuates the possibility that he’s really a snob. Though Hal hasn’t had more than four or five total very small hits off the public duBois, this is a prime example of what’s sometimes called ‘marijuana thinking.’ You can tell because Hal’s leaned way over to spit but has gotten lost in a paralytic thought-helix and hasn’t yet spit, even though he’s right in bombing-position over the NASA glass. It also occurs to him that he finds the real-snow/unreal-snow snag in the Eschaton extremely abstract but somehow way more interesting than the Eschaton itself, so far.”
IRLIBSYR’s strongman Evan Ingersoll, all of 1.3 m. tall, warmed by baby-fat and high-calorie cerebral endeavor, has been squatting on his heels like a catcher just west of Damascus, spinning his Rossignol launcher idly in his hand, watching the one-sided exchange between Pemulis and Ingersoll’s roommate J. J. Penn, who’s now threatening to quit and go in for cocoa if they can’t for once play Eschaton without the big guys horning in again like always. There’s a tiny whirring sound as Ingersoll’s mental gears grind. From the duration of the little Sierra Leone summit and the studious blankness on everybody’s face it’s pretty clear that SOVWAR and AMNAT are going to come to terms, and the terms are likely to involve SOVWAR agreeing not to go SACPOP against AMNAT in return for AMNAT letting SOVWAR go SACPOP against Ingersoll’s IRLIBSYR, because if SOVWAR goes SACPOP against an IRLIBSYR that can’t have many warheads left in the old bucket by now (Ingersoll knows they know) then SOVWAR’ll get to rack up a lot of INDDIR without much SUFDDIR, while inflicting such SUFDDIR on IRLIBSYR that IRLIBSYR’ll be effectively eliminated as a threat to AMNAT’s commanding lead in points, which is what has the most utility in the old game-theoretic matrix right now. The exact utility transformations are too oogly for an Ingersoll who’s still grappling with fractions, but he can see clearly that this’d be the most remorselessly logical best-interest-conducive scenario for both LaMont Chu and especially the Sleepster, Peterson, who’s hated Ingersoll for months now anyway without any good reason or cause or anything, Ingersoll can just somehow tell.
Hal, paralyzed and absorbed, watches Ingersoll bob on his haunches and shift his stick from hand to hand and cerebrate furiously and logically conclude, then, that IRLIBSYR’s highest possible strategic utility lies in AMNAT and SOVWAR failing to come to terms. Hal can almost visualize a dark lightbulb going on above Ingersoll’s head. Pemulis is telling Penn that there’s a critical distinction between horning in and letting asswipes like Jeffrey Joseph Penn run roughshod over the delimiting boundaries that are Eschaton’s very life-blood. Chu and Peterson are nodding soberly at little things they’re saying to each other while Kittenplan cracks her knuckles and Possalthwaite bounces a warhead idly on his strings.”
“So now Evan Ingersoll rises from his squat now only to bend again and take a warhead out of IRLIBSYR’s ordnance-bucket, and Hal seems to be the only one who sees Ingersoll line up the vector very carefully with his slim thumb and take a lavish backswing and fire the ball directly at the little circle of super-Combatant leaders in West Africa. It’s not a lob. It flies straight as if shot from a rifle and strikes Ann Kittenplan right in the back of the head with a loud thock. She whirls to face east, a hand at the back of her bristly skull, scanning and then locking on Damascus, her face a stony Toltec death-mask.”
“Pemulis and Penn and Lord and everyone else all freeze, shocked and silent, so there’s just the weird glittered hiss of falling snow and the sounds of a couple crows interfacing in the pines over by HmH. The ATHSCME fans are silent, and four sweatsock-shaped clouds of exhaust hang motionless over the Sunstrand stacks. Nothing moves. No Eschaton Combatant has ever intentionally struck another Combatant’s physical person with a 5-megaton thermonuclear weapon. No matter how frayed players’ nerves, it’s never made a lick of sense. A Combatant’s megatonnage is too precious to waste on personal attacks outside the map. It’s been like this unspoken but very basic rule.”
“Ann Kittenplan is so shocked and enraged that she stands there transfixed, quivering, her sights locked on Ingersoll and his smoking Rossignol. Otis P. Lord feels at his beanie.
Ingersoll now makes a show of examining the tiny nails of his left hand and casually suggests that IRLIBSYR has just scored a direct 5-megaton contact-burst against SOVWAR’s entire launch capacity, namely Air Marshal Ann Kittenplan, and that plus also AMNAT’s own launch capacity, plus both Combatants’ ordnance and heads of state, all lie well within the blast’s kill-radius — which by Ingersoll’s rough calculations extends from the Ivory Coast to the doubles alley’s Senegal. Unless of course that kill-radius is somehow altered by the possible presence of climatic snow, he adds, beaming.
Pemulis and Kittenplan now each let loose with a linear series of anti-Ingersoll invectives that drown each other out and make the trees’ crows take slow flight.”
But Otis Lord — who’s watched the exchange, ashen, and has called up something relevant on EndStat’s TREEMASTER metadecision subdirectory — now, to everyone’s horror, removes from around his neck a shoelace with a little nickel-colored key and bends to the small locked so-lander box on the food cart’s bottom shelf and as everyone watches in horror opens the box and with near-ceremonial care exchanges the white beanie on his head for the red beanie that signifies Utter Global Crisis. The dreaded red UGC beanie has been donned by an Eschaton game-master only once before, and that was over three years ago, when human input-error on EndStat tallies of aggregate SUFDDIR during a three-way SACPOP free-for-all yielded an apparent ignition of the earth’s atmosphere.
Now a real-world chill descends over the grainily white-swirled landscape of the nuclear theater.”
“Pemulis tells Lord he cannot believe his fucking eyes. He tells Lord how dare he don the dreaded red beanie over such an obvious instance of map-not-territory equivocationary horseshit as Ingersoll’s trying to foist.
Lord, bent to the cart’s blinking Yushityu, responds that there seems to be a problem.”
“Ingersoll is whistling and pretending to do the Charleston between Abu Kemal and Es Suweida, using his racquet like a hoofer’s cane.
Hal finally spits.
Under Pemulis’s wild-eyed stare, Lord clears his throat and calls out to Ingersoll, tentatively positing that today’s pre-game Triggering-Situation negotiations established no valid strategic target areas in the postage-stamp-sized nation of Sierra Leone.”
“Ingersoll calls back across the Mediterranean that target areas of keen strategic interest appeared in Sierra Leone at the exact moment the heads of state and total launch capacities of AMNAT and SOVWAR took it upon themselves to traipse into Sierra Leone. That Sierra Leone thenceforward as of that moment has, or rather had, he pretends to correct with a smile, become a de facto SSTRAC. If presidents and premiers wanted to leave the protection of their territories’ defense-nets and hold cliquey little other-Combatant-excluding parleys in some hut somewhere that was up to them, but Lord had been wearing the white beanie that explicitly authorized the overexploited and underdeveloped defenders of the One True Faith of the world to keep on pursuing their strategic interests, and IRLIBSYR was now keenly interested in the aggregate INDDIR-points it had coming to them for just now vaporizing both super-Combatants’ strategic capacities with one Flaming-Sword-of-The-Most-High-like strike.
Ann Kittenplan keeps taking a couple quivery steps toward Ingersoll and getting restrained and pulled back by LaMont Chu.”
Sleepy T.P.’ Peterson, who always looks a little dazed even in the best of circumstances, asks Otis P. Lord to define equivocationary for him, causing Hal Incandenza to laugh out loud despite himself.”
“Just outside the theater’s fence, Pemulis is bug-eyed with fury — not impossibly ‘drine-aggravated — and is literally jumping up and down in one spot so hard that his yachting cap jumps slightly off his head with each impact, which Troeltsch and Axford confer and agree they have previously seen occur only in animated cartoons. Pemulis howls that Lord is in his vacillation appeasing Ingersoll in Ingersoll’s effort to fatally fuck with the very breath and bread of Eschaton.[130] Players themselves can’t be valid targets. Players aren’t inside the goddamn game. Players are part of the apparatus of the game. They’re part of the map. It’s snowing on the players but not on the territory. They’re part of the map, not the cluster-fucking territory. You can only launch against the territory. Not against the map. It’s like the one ground-rule boundary that keeps Eschaton from degenerating into chaos. Eschaton gentlemen is about logic and axiom and mathematical probity and discipline and verity and order. You do not get points for hitting anybody real. Only the gear that maps what’s real. Pemulis keeps looking back over his shoulder to the pavilion and screaming ‘Jaysus!”
IngersolPs roommate J. J. Penn tries to claim that the vaporized Ann Kittenplan is wearing several articles of gear worth mucho INDDIR, and everyone tells him to shut up. The snow is now coming down hard enough to compose an environment, and everybody outside the sheltered pavilion looks gauzily shrouded, from Hal’s perspective.
Lord is crunching madly away at the TP under the just-opened protection of an old beach umbrella a previous game-master had welded to the top of the food cart. Lord wipes his nose against the same shoulder that’s clamping a phone to his ear, awkwardly, and reports he’s checked the D.E.C.’s Eschaton-Axiom directory via Pink2-capable modem and that unfortunately with all due respect to Ann and Mike it doesn’t seem to explicitly say players with strategic functions can’t become target-areas if they traipse around outside their defense-nets. LaMont Chu says how come point-values for actual players have never been assigned, then, for Pete’s sake, and Pemulis shouts across that that’s so totally beside the point it doesn’t matter, that the reason players aren’t explicitly exempted in the ESCHAX.DIR is that their exemption is what makes Eschaton and its axioms fucking possible in the first place. A kind of pale boat-wake of exhaust exits the idling Ford sedan off behind the pavilion and widens as it rises, dispersing. Pemulis says because otherwise use your heads otherwise nonstrategic emotions would get aroused and Combatants would be whacking balls at each other’s physical persons all the time and Eschaton wouldn’t even be possible in its icily elegant game-theoretical form. He’s stopped jumping up and down, at least, Troeltsch observes.”
“Players’ exemption from strikes goes without saying, Pemulis says; it’s like preaxiomatic. Pemulis tells Lord to consider what he’s doing very carefully, because from where Pemulis is standing Lord looks to be willing to very possibly compromise Eschaton’s map for all time. Girls 16’s/18’s prorector Mary Esther Thode putts from left to right behind the pavilion on the long driveway from the circular drive to the portcullis and halts her scooter and lifts her helmet’s tinted visor and yells across for Kittenplan to put a hat on if she’s going to play in the snow in a crew-cut. This even though Kittenplan isn’t even strictly in Ms. Thode’s like umbrella of authority, Axford observes to Troeltsch, who relays this fact into his headset. Hal moves his mouth around to try to gather up spit in a mouth that’s gotten rather dry, which when you have a plug of Kodiak in is not very pleasant. Ann Kittenplan has been suffering from what look like almost Parkinsonian tremors for the last few minutes, her face writhing and her mustache almost standing right out straight. LaMont Chu repeats his claim that there’s no way players even with strategic functions can ever be legit target-areas if no INDDIR/SUFDDIR values have been entered for them in EndStat’s tally-function. Pemulis orders Chu not to distract Otis Lord from the incredibly potent and lethal ground Lord’s letting Ingersoll lead them onto. He says none of them have ever even seen the true meaning of the word crisis yet. Ingersoll calls over to Pemulis that his emeritus veto-power is only over Lord’s calculations, not over today’s game’s God’s decisions about what’s part of the game and what isn’t. Pemulis invites Ingersoll to do something anatomically impossible. Pemulis asks LaMont Chu and Ann Kittenplan if they’re just going to stand there with their thumbs in their bottoms and let Lord let Ingersoll eliminate Eschaton’s map for keeps for one slimy cheesy victory in just one day’s apocalypse”
“Kittenplan has been trembling and feeling at the back of her vein-laced head and looking across the Mediterranean at Ingersoll like somebody who knows they’ll go to prison for what they want to do. Axford posits certain very unlikely physical conditions under which what Pemulis told Ingersoll to do to himself wouldn’t be totally impossible. Hal spits thickly and gathers and tries to spit again, watching. Troeltsch broadcasts the fact that there’s always a queer vague vitaminish stink about Mary Esther Thode that he never can quite place. There’s the sudden tripartite whump of three Empire Waste Displacement vehicles being propelled above the cloud-cover to points far north. Hal identifies Thode’s ambient odor as the stink of thiamine, which for reasons best known to Thode she takes a lot of; and Troeltsch broadcasts the datum and refers to Hal as a ‘close source,’ which strikes Hal as odd and somehow off in a way he can’t quite name. Kittenplan shakes Chu’s arm loose and darts over and extracts a warhead from SOVWAR’s portable stockpile and shouts out that well OK then if players can be targets then in that case: and she “fires a real screamer at IngersolPs head, which Ingersoll barely blocks with his Rossignol and shrieks that Kittenplan can’t launch anything at anything because she’s been vaporized by a 5-megaton contact-burst. Kittenplan tells Ingersoll to write his congressman about it and over LaMont Chu’s pleas for reasoned discussion takes several more theoretically valuable warheads out of the industrial-solvent bucket and gets truly serious about hitting Ingersoll, moving steadily east across Nigeria and Chad, causing Ingersoll to run due north across the courts’ map at impressive speed, abandoning IRLIBSYR’s ammo-bucket and tear-assing up through Siberia crying Foul. Lord’s mewing ineffectually for order, but some of the other Combatants’ staffs have begun to smell that Evan Ingersoll’s become fair game for cruelty — the way kids can seem to smell this sort of thing out with such uncanny acuity — and REDCHPs General Secretary and an AM-NAT vector-planning specialist and Josh Gopnik all start moving northeast over the map firing balls as hard as they can at Ingersoll, who’s dropped his launcher and is shaking frantically at the chained gate on the fence’s north side, where Mrs. Incandenza has decided she doesn’t want kids exiting the East Courts and trampling her calliopsis; and these little kids can hit balls exceptionally hard. Hal is now unable to gather enough spit to spit. One warhead hits Ingersoll in the neck and another solidly in the meat of the thigh. Ingersoll begins to limp around in small circles holding his neck, crying in that slow-motion shuddery way little kids have when they’re crying more at the fact of being hurt than at the hurt itself. Pemulis is walking backwards away from the south fence back toward the pavilion and has both arms up in either appeal or fury or something else. Axford tells Hal and Troeltsch he wishes he didn’t feel the dark thrill he felt watching Ingersoll get pummeled. Some filmy red peanut-skin has gotten into Jim Struck’s hair as he lies there motionless. O. P. Lord attempts to rule that “Ingersoll is no longer on the four courts of Eschaton’s earth-map and so isn’t even theoretically a valid target-area. It doesn’t matter. Several kids close in on Ingersoll, triangulating their bombardment, T. Peterson on point. Ingersoll is hit several times, once right near the eye. Jim Troeltsch is up and running to the fence wanting to stop the thing, but Pemulis catches him by his headset’s cord and tells him to let them all lie in their own bed. Hal, now leaning forward, steeple-fingered, finds himself just about paralyzed with absorption. Trevor Axford, fist to his chin, asks Hal if he’s ever just simply fucking hated somebody without having any idea why. Hal finds himself riveted at something about the degenerating game that seems so terribly abstract and fraught with implications and consequences that even thinking about how to articulate it seems so complexly stressful that being almost incapacitated with absorption is almost the only way out of the complex stress. ”
“Now INDPAK’s Penn and AMNAT’s McKenna, who have long-standing personal bones to pick with Ann Kittenplan, peel off and gather ordnance and execute a pincer movement on Ann Kittenplan. She is hit twice from behind at close range. Ingersoll has long since gone down and is still getting hit. Lord is ruling at the top of his lungs that there’s no way AMNAT can launch against itself when he gets tagged right on the breastbone by an errant warhead. Clutching his chest with one hand, with the other he flicks the red beanie’s propeller, never before flicked, whose flicked spin heralds a worst-case-&-utterly-decontrolled-Armageddon-type situation. Timmy Peterson takes a ball in the groin and goes down like a sack of refined flour. Everybody’s scooping up spent warheads and totally unrealistically refiring them. The fences shudder and sing as balls rain against them. Ingersoll now resembles some sort of animal that’s been run over in the road. Troeltsch, who’s looking for the first time at the idling sedan by West House’s dump-sters and asking if anybody knew anybody who drove a Nunhagen-Aspirin-adverting Ford, is the only upperclass spectator who doesn’t seem utterly silently engrossed. Ann Kittenplan has dropped her racquet and is charging McKenna. She takes two contact-bursts in the breast-area before she gets to him and lays McKenna out with an impressive left cross. LaMont Chu tackles Todd Possalthwaite from behind. Struck looks to have wet his pants in his sleep. J. J. Penn slips on a grounded warhead near Fiji and goes spectacularly down. The snowfall makes everything gauzy and terribly clear at the same time, eliminating all visual background so that the map’s action seems stark and surreal. Nobody’s using tennis balls now anymore. Josh Gopnik punches LaMont Chu in the stomach, and LaMont Chu yells that he’s been punched in the stomach.”
“Ann Kittenplan has Kieran McKenna in a headlock and is punching him repeatedly on the top of the skull. Otis P. Lord lets down the beach umbrella and starts pushing his crazy-wheeled food cart at a diskette-rattling clip toward 12’s open south gate, still flicking furiously at the red beanie’s propeller. Struck’s hair is steadily accreting nut-skins. Pemulís is under cover but still standing, his legs well apart and his arms folded. The figure in the green Ford still hasn’t moved once. Troeltsch says he for his own part wouldn’t be just sitting and lying there if any of the Little Buddies under his personal charge were out there getting potentially injured, and Hal reflects that he does feel a certain sort of intense anxiety but can’t sort through the almost infinite-seeming implications of what Troeltsch is saying fast enough to determine whether the anxiety is over something about what he’s seeing or something in the connection between what Troeltsch is saying and the degree to which he’s absorbed in what’s going on out inside the fence, which is a degenerative chaos so complex in its disorder that it’s hard to tell whether it seems choreographed or simply chaotically disordered. LaMont Chu is throwing up into the Indian Ocean. Todd Possalthwaite has his hands to his face and is shrieking something about his ‘doze.’ It is now, beyond any argument or equivocation, snowing. The sky is off-white. Lord and his cart are now literally making tracks for the edge of the map. Evan Ingersoll hasn’t moved in several minutes. Penn lies in a whitening service box with one leg bent beneath him at an impossible angle. Someone way off behind them has been blowing an athletic whistle. Ann Kittenplan begins to chase REDCHI’s General Secretary south across the Asian subcontinent at top speed. Pemulis is telling Hal he hates to say he told them so. Hal can see Axford leaning way forward sheltering something tiny from the wind as he flicks at it with a spent lighter. It occurs to him this is the third anniversary of Axhandle losing a right finger and half his right thumb.”
“Fierce little J. Gopnik is flailing at the air and telling whoever wants it to come on, come on. Otis P. Lord and his cart sail clattering across Indochina toward the southern gate. Hal is suddenly aware that Troeltsch and Pemulis are wincing but is not himself wincing and isn’t sure why they are wincing and is looking out into the fray trying to determine whether he should be wincing when REDCHI’s General Secretary, calling loudly for his mother and in full flight as he looks over his shoulder at Ann Kittenplan’s contorted face, barrels directly into Lord’s speeding food cart. There’s a noise like the historical sum of all cafeteria accidents everywhere. 3.6-MB diskettes take flight like mad bats across what uncovered would be the baseline of Court 12. Different-colored beanies spill from the rolling solander box, whose lock’s hasp is broken and protrudes like a tongue as it rolls. The TP’s monitor and modem and Yushityu chassis, with most of Eschaton’s nervous system on its hard drive, assume a parabolic southwest vector. The heavy equipment’s altitude is impressive. An odd silent still moment hangs, the TP aloft. Pemulis bellows, his hands to his cheeks. Otis P. Lord hurdles the bent forms of food cart and General Secretary and sprints low over the court’s map’s snow, trying to save hardware that’s now at the top of its rainbow’s arc. It’s clear Lord won’t make it. It’s a slow-motion moment. The snowfall’s more than heavy enough now, Hal thinks, to excuse Lord’s not seeing LaMont Chu directly before him, on his hands and knees, throwing up. Lord impacts Chu’s arched form at about knee-level and is spectacularly airborne. The idling Ford reveals a sudden face at the driver’s-side window. Axford is holding the lighter’s chassis up to his ear and shaking it. Ann Kittenplan is ramming REDCHI’s leader’s face repeatedly into the mesh of the south fence. Lord’s flight’s parabola is less spectacular on the y-axis than the TP’s has been. The Yushityu’s hard-drive chassis makes an indescribable sound as it hits the earth and its brightly circuited guts come out. The color monitor lands on its back with its screen blinking ERROR at the white sky. Hal and everyone else can project Lord’s flight’s own terminus an instant before impact. For a brief moment that Hal will later regard as completely and uncomfortably bizarre, Hal feels at his own face to see whether he is wincing. The distant whistle patweets. Lord does indeed go headfirst down through the monitor’s screen, and stays there, his sneakers in the air and his warm-up pants sagging upward to reveal black socks. There’d been a bad sound of glass. Penn flails on his back. Possalthwaite, Ingersoll, and McKenna bleed. The second shift’s 1600h. siren down at Sunstrand Power & Light is creepily muffled by the no-sound of falling snow.
October 28, 1984
Is It O.K. To Be A Luddite?
By THOMAS PYNCHON
As if being 1984 weren’t enough, it’s also the 25th anniversary this year of C. P. Snow’s famous Rede Lecture, ”The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution,” notable for its warning that intellectual life in the West was becoming increasingly polarized into ”literary” and ”scientific” factions, each doomed not to understand or appreciate the other. The lecture was originally meant to address such matters as curriculum reform in the age of Sputnik and the role of technology in the development of what would soon be known as the third world. But it was the two-culture formulation that got people’s attention. In fact it kicked up an amazing row in its day. To some already simplified points, further reductions were made, provoking certain remarks, name-calling, even intemperate rejoinders, giving the whole affair, though attenuated by the mists of time, a distinctly cranky look.
Today nobody could get away with making such a distinction. Since 1959, we have come to live among flows of data more vast than anything the world has seen. Demystification is the order of our day, all the cats are jumping out of all the bags and even beginning to mingle. We immediately suspect ego insecurity in people who may still try to hide behind the jargon of a specialty or pretend to some data base forever ”beyond” the reach of a layman. Anybody with the time, literacy and access fee these days can get together with just about any piece of specialized knowledge s/he may need. So, to that extent, the two-cultures quarrel can no longer be sustained. As a visit to any local library or magazine rack will easily confirm, there are now so many more than two cultures that the problem has really become how to find the time to read anything outside one’s own specialty.
What has persisted, after a long quarter century, is the element of human character. C. P. Snow, with the reflexes of a novelist after all, sought to identify not only two kinds of education but also two kinds of personality. Fragmentary echoes of old disputes, of unforgotten offense taken in the course of long-ago high- table chitchat, may have helped form the subtext for Snow’s immoderate, and thus celebrated, assertion, ”If we forget the scientific culture, then the rest of intellectuals have never tried, wanted, or been able to understand the Industrial Revolution.” Such ”intellectuals,” for the most part ”literary,” were supposed, by Lord Snow, to be ”natural Luddites.’’ Except maybe for Brainy Smurf, it’s hard to imagine anybody these days wanting to be called a literary intellectual, though it doesn’t sound so bad if you broaden the labeling to, say, ”people who read and think.” Being called a Luddite is another matter. It brings up questions such as, Is there something about reading and thinking that would cause or predispose a person to turn Luddite? Is it O.K. to be a Luddite? And come to think of it, what is a Luddite, anyway?
HISTORICALLY, Luddites flourished in Britain from about 1811 to 1816. They were bands of men, organized, masked, anonymous, whose object was to destroy machinery used mostly in the textile industry. They swore allegiance not to any British king but to their own King Ludd. It isn’t clear whether they called themselves Luddites, although they were so termed by both friends and enemies. C. P. Snow’s use of the word was clearly polemical, wishing to imply an irrational fear and hatred of science and technology. Luddites had, in this view, come to be imagined as the counterrevolutionaries of that ”Industrial Revolution” which their modern versions have ”never tried, wanted, or been able to understand.”
But the Industrial Revolution was not, like the American and French Revolutions of about the same period, a violent struggle with a beginning, middle and end. It was smoother, less conclusive, more like an accelerated passage in a long evolution. The phrase was first popularized a hundred years ago by the historian Arnold Toynbee, and has had its share of revisionist attention, lately in the July 1984 Scientific American. Here, in ”Medieval Roots of the Industrial Revolution,” Terry S. Reynolds suggests that the early role of the steam engine (1765) may have been overdramatized. Far from being revolutionary, much of the machinery that steam was coming to drive had already long been in place, having in fact been driven by water power since the Middle Ages. Nevertheless, the idea of a technosocial ”revolution,” in which the same people came out on top as in France and America, has proven of use to many over the years, not least to those who, like C. P. Snow, have thought that in ”Luddite” they have discovered a way to call those with whom they disagree both politically reactionary and anti-capitalist at the same time.
But the Oxford English Dictionary has an interesting tale to tell. In 1779, in a village somewhere in Leicestershire, one Ned Lud broke into a house and ”in a fit of insane rage” destroyed two machines used for knitting hosiery. Word got around. Soon, whenever a stocking- frame was found sabotaged – this had been going on, sez the Encyclopedia Britannica, since about 1710 – folks would respond with the catch phrase ”Lud must have been here.” By the time his name was taken up by the frame-breakers of 1812, historical Ned Lud was well absorbed into the more or less sarcastic nickname ”King (or Captain) Ludd,” and was now all mystery, resonance and dark fun: a more-than-human presence, out in the night, roaming the hosiery districts of England, possessed by a single comic shtick – every time he spots a stocking-frame he goes crazy and proceeds to trash it.
But it’s important to remember that the target even of the original assault of 1779, like many machines of the Industrial Revolution, was not a new piece of technology. The stocking-frame had been around since 1589, when, according to the folklore, it was invented by the Rev. William Lee, out of pure meanness. Seems that Lee was in love with a young woman who was more interested in her knitting than in him. He’d show up at her place. ”Sorry, Rev, got some knitting.” ”What, again?” After a while, unable to deal with this kind of rejection, Lee, not, like Ned Lud, in any fit of insane rage, but let’s imagine logically and coolly, vowed to in vent a machine that would make the hand-knitting of hosiery obsolete. And he did. According to the encyclopedia, the jilted cleric’s frame ”was so perfect in its conception that it continued to be the only mechanical means of knitting for hundreds of years.”
Now, given that kind of time span, it’s just not easy to think of Ned Lud as a technophobic crazy. No doubt what people admired and mythologized him for was the vigor and single-mindedness of his assault. But the words ”fit of insane rage” are third-hand and at least 68 years after the event. And Ned Lud’s anger was not directed at the machines, not exactly. I like to think of it more as the controlled, martial-arts type anger of the dedicated Badass.
There is a long folk history of this figure, the Badass. He is usually male, and while sometimes earning the quizzical tolerance of women, is almost universally admired by men for two basic virtues: he is Bad, and he is Big. Bad meaning not morally evil, necessarily, more like able to work mischief on a large scale. What is important here is the amplifying of scale, the multiplication of effect.
The knitting machines which provoked the first Luddite disturbances had been putting people out of work for well over two centuries. Everybody saw this happening – it became part of daily life. They also saw the machines coming more and more to be the property of men who did not work, only owned and hired. It took no German philosopher, then or later, to point out what this did, had been doing, to wages and jobs. Public feeling about the machines could never have been simple unreasoning horror, but likely something more complex: the love/hate that grows up between humans and machinery – especially when it’s been around for a while – not to mention serious resentment toward at least two multiplications of effect that were seen as unfair and threatening. One was the concentration of capital that each machine represented, and the other was the ability of each machine to put a certain number of humans out of work – to be ”worth” that many human souls. What gave King Ludd his special Bad charisma, took him from local hero to nationwide public enemy, was that he went up against these amplified, multiplied, more than human opponents and prevailed. When times are hard, and we feel at the mercy of forces many times more powerful, don’t we, in seeking some equalizer, turn, if only in imagination, in wish, to the Badass – the djinn, the golem, the hulk, the superhero – who will resist what otherwise would overwhelm us? Of course, the real or secular frame-bashing was still being done by everyday folks, trade unionists ahead of their time, using the night, and their own solidarity and discipline, to achieve their multiplications of effect.
It was open-eyed class war. The movement had its Parliamentary allies, among them Lord Byron, whose maiden speech in the House of Lords in 1812 compassionately argued against a bill proposing, among other repressive measures, to make frame-breaking punishable by death. ”Are you not near the Luddites?” he wrote from Venice to Thomas Moore. ”By the Lord! if there’s a row, but I’ll be among ye! How go on the weavers – the breakers of frames – the Lutherans of politics – the reformers?” He includes an ”amiable chanson, ” which proves to be a Luddite hymn so inflammatory that it wasn’t published till after the poet’s death. The letter is dated December 1816: Byron had spent the summer previous in Switzerland, cooped up for a while in the Villa Diodati with the Shelleys, watching the rain come down, while they all told each other ghost stories. By that December, as it happened, Mary Shelley was working on Chapter Four of her novel ”Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus.”
If there were such a genre as the Luddite novel, this one, warning of what can happen when technology, and those who practice it, get out of hand, would be the first and among the best. Victor Frankenstein’s creature also, surely, qualifies as a major literary Badass. ”I resolved . . .,” Victor tells us, ”to make the being of a gigantic stature, that is to say, about eight feet in height, and proportionably large,” which takes care of Big. The story of how he got to be so Bad is the heart of the novel, sheltered innermost: told to Victor in the first person by the creature himself, then nested inside of Victor’s own narrative, which is nested in its turn in the letters of the arctic explorer Robert Walton. However much of ”Frankenstein’s” longevity is owing to the undersung genius James Whale, who translated it to film, it remains today more than well worth reading, for all the reasons we read novels, as well as for the much more limited question of its Luddite value: that is, for its attempt, through literary means which are nocturnal and deal in disguise, to deny the machine.
Look, for example, at Victor’s account of how he assembles and animates his creature. He must, of course, be a little vague about the details, but we’re left with a procedure that seems to include surgery, electricity (though nothing like Whale’s galvanic extravaganzas), chemistry, even, from dark hints about Paracelsus and Albertus Magnus, the still recently discredited form of magic known as alchemy. What is clear, though, despite the commonly depicted Bolt Through the Neck, is that neither the method nor the creature that results is mechanical.
This is one of several interesting similarities between ”Frankenstein” and an earlier tale of the Bad and Big, ”The Castle of Otranto” (1765), by Horace Walpole, usually regarded as the first Gothic novel. For one thing, both authors, in presenting their books to the public, used voices not their own. Mary Shelley’s preface was written by her husband, Percy, who was pretending to be her. Not till 15 years later did she write an introduction to ”Frankenstein” in her own voice. Walpole, on the other hand, gave his book an entire made-up publishing history, claiming it was a translation from medieval Italian. Only in his preface to the second edition did he admit authorship.
THE novels are also of strikingly similar nocturnal origin: both resulted from episodes of lucid dreaming. Mary Shelley, that ghost-story summer in Geneva, trying to get to sleep one midnight, suddenly beheld the creature being brought to life, the images arising in her mind ”with a vividness far beyond the usual bounds of reverie.” Walpole had awakened from a dream, ”of which, all I could remember was, that I had thought myself in an ancient castle . . . and that on the uppermost bannister of a great staircase I saw a gigantic hand in armour.”
In Walpole’s novel, this hand shows up as the hand of Alfonso the Good, former Prince of Otranto and, despite his epithet, the castle’s resident Badass. Alfonso, like Frankenstein’s creature, is assembled from pieces – sable-plumed helmet, foot, leg, sword, all of them, like the hand, quite oversized – which fall from the sky or just materialize here and there about the castle grounds, relentless as Freud’s slow return of the repressed. The activating agencies, again like those in ”Frankenstein,” are non-mechanical. The final assembly of ”the form of Alfonso, dilated to an immense magnitude,” is achieved through supernatural means: a family curse, and the intercession of Otranto’s patron saint.
The craze for Gothic fiction after ”The Castle of Otranto” was grounded, I suspect, in deep and religious yearnings for that earlier mythical time which had come to be known as the Age of Miracles. In ways more and less literal, folks in the 18th century believed that once upon a time all kinds of things had been possible which were no longer so. Giants, dragons, spells. The laws of nature had not been so strictly formulated back then. What had once been true working magic had, by the Age of Reason, degenerated into mere machinery. Blake’s dark Satanic mills represented an old magic that, like Satan, had fallen from grace. As religion was being more and more secularized into Deism and nonbelief, the abiding human hunger for evidence of God and afterlife, for salvation – bodily resurrection, if possible – remained. The Methodist movement and the American Great Awakening were only two sectors on a broad front of resistance to the Age of Reason, a front which included Radicalism and Freemasonry as well as Luddites and the Gothic novel. Each in its way expressed the same profound unwillingness to give up elements of faith, however ”irrational,” to an emerging technopolitical order that might or might not know what it was doing. ”Gothic” became code for ”medieval,” and that has remained code for ”miraculous,” on through Pre-Raphaelites, turn-of-the-century tarot cards, space opera in the pulps and the comics, down to ”Star Wars” and contemporary tales of sword and sorcery.
TO insist on the miraculous is to deny to the machine at least some of its claims on us, to assert the limited wish that living things, earthly and otherwise, may on occasion become Bad and Big enough to take part in transcendent doings. By this theory, for example, King Kong (?-1933) becomes your classic Luddite saint. The final dialogue in the movie, you recall, goes: ”Well, the airplanes got him.” ”No . . . it was Beauty killed the Beast.” In which again we encounter the same Snovian Disjunction, only different, between the human and the technological. But if we do insist upon fictional violations of the laws of nature – of space, time, thermodynamics, and the big one, mortality itself – then we risk being judged by the literary mainstream as Insufficiently Serious. Being serious about these matters is one way that adults have traditionally defined themselves against the confidently immortal children they must deal with. Looking back on ”Frankenstein,” which she wrote when she was 19, Mary Shelley said, ”I have an affection for it, for it was the offspring of happy days, when death and grief were but words which found no true echo in my heart.” The Gothic attitude in general, because it used images of death and ghostly survival toward no more responsible end than special effects and cheap thrills, was judged not Serious enough and confined to its own part of town. It is not the only neighborhood in the great City of Literature so, let us say, closely defined. In westerns, the good people always win. In romance novels, love conquers all. In whodunitsses we know better. We say, ”But the world isn’t like that.” These genres, by insisting on what is contrary to fact, fail to be Serious enough, and so they get redlined under the label ”escapist fare.”
This is especially unfortunate in the case of science fiction, in which the decade after Hiroshima saw one of the most remarkable flowerings of literary talent and, quite often, genius, in our history. It was just as important as the Beat movement going on at the same time, certainly more important than mainstream fiction, which with only a few exceptions had been paralyzed by the political climate of the cold war and McCarthy years. Besides being a nearly ideal synthesis of the Two Cultures, science fiction also happens to have been one of the principal refuges, in our time, for those of Luddite persuasion.
By 1945, the factory system – which, more than any piece of machinery, was the real and major result of the Industrial Revolution – had been extended to include the Manhattan Project, the German long-range rocket program and the death camps, such as Auschwitz. It has taken no major gift of prophecy to see how these three curves of development might plausibly converge, and before too long. Since Hiroshima, we have watched nuclear weapons multiply out of control, and delivery systems acquire, for global purposes, unlimited range and accuracy. An unblinking acceptance of a holocaust running to seven- and eight-figure body counts has become – among those who, particularly since 1980, have been guiding our military policies – conventional wisdom.
To people who were writing science fiction in the 50’s, none of this was much of a surprise, though modern Luddite imaginations have yet to come up with any countercritter Bad and Big enough, even in the most irresponsible of fictions, to begin to compare with what would happen in a nuclear war. So, in the science fiction of the Atomic Age and the cold war, we see the Luddite impulse to deny the machine taking a different direction. The hardware angle got de-emphasized in favor of more humanistic concerns – exotic cultural evolutions and social scenarios, paradoxes and games with space/ time, wild philosophical questions – most of it sharing, as the critical literature has amply discussed, a definition of ”human” as particularly distinguished from ”machine.” Like their earlier counterparts, 20th-century Luddites looked back yearningly to another age – curiously, the same Age of Reason which had forced the first Luddites into nostalgia for the Age of Miracles.
But we now live, we are told, in the Computer Age. What is the outlook for Luddite sensibility? Will mainframes attract the same hostile attention as knitting frames once did? I really doubt it. Writers of all descriptions are stampeding to buy word processors. Machines have already become so user-friendly that even the most unreconstructed of Luddites can be charmed into laying down the old sledgehammer and stroking a few keys instead. Beyond this seems to be a growing consensus that knowledge really is power, that there is a pretty straightforward conversion between money and information, and that somehow, if the logistics can be worked out, miracles may yet be possible. If this is so, Luddites may at last have come to stand on common ground with their Snovian adversaries, the cheerful army of technocrats who were supposed to have the ”future in their bones.” It may be only a new form of the perennial Luddite ambivalence about machines, or it may be that the deepest Luddite hope of miracle has now come to reside in the computer’s ability to get the right data to those whom the data will do the most good. With the proper deployment of budget and computer time, we will cure cancer, save ourselves from nuclear extinction, grow food for everybody, detoxify the results of industrial greed gone berserk – realize all the wistful pipe dreams of our days.
THE word ”Luddite” continues to be applied with contempt to anyone with doubts about technology, especially the nuclear kind. Luddites today are no longer faced with human factory owners and vulnerable machines. As well-known President and unintentional Luddite D. D. Eisenhower prophesied when he left office, there is now a permanent power establishment of admirals, generals and corporate CEO’s, up against whom us average poor bastards are completely outclassed, although Ike didn’t put it quite that way. We are all supposed to keep tranquil and allow it to go on, even though, because of the data revolution, it becomes every day less possible to fool any of the people any of the time. If our world survives, the next great challenge to watch out for will come – you heard it here first – when the curves of research and development in artificial intelligence, molecular biology and robotics all converge. Oboy. It will be amazing and unpredictable, and even the biggest of brass, let us devoutly hope, are going to be caught flat-footed. It is certainly something for all good Luddites to look forward to if, God willing, we should live so long. Meantime, as Americans, we can take comfort, however minimal and cold, from Lord Byron’s mischievously improvised song, in which he, like other observers of the time, saw clear identification between the first Luddites and our own revolutionary origins. It begins:
As the Liberty lads o’er the sea
Bought their freedom, and cheaply, with blood,
So we, boys, we
Will die fighting, or live free,
And down with all kings but King Ludd!
https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/12/1219787_re-fwd-oh-gosh-.html
Standing 309.6 metres (1,016 ft) at its highest point, and 308.5 metres (1,012 ft) at the highest point of its steelwork,[19] The Shard became the tallest building in the European Union in December 2011,[55] and the tallest completed building in Europe on 30 March 2012. It is taller than Frankfurt‘s Commerzbank Tower at 259 m (850 ft) the record holder between 1997 and 2005 and three later skyscrapers of Moscow: the Triumph-Palace, Naberezhnaya Tower, and City of Capitals. These three had each held the title for roughly 2 1⁄2 years. The Shard was overtaken by a fourth such tower in November 2012: the 339-metre (1,112 ft) Mercury City Tower.[60][61] The Shard is set to be surpassed as the tallest European building outside Russia by the 310 metre (1,017 ft) Varso Tower, Warsaw, Poland upon its completion in 2020, and the 323-metre (1,060 ft) Hermitage Plaza building, which is planned to be completed in La Défense, Paris, in 2024. The Shard was developed by Sellar Property Group on behalf of LBQ Ltd and is jointly owned by Sellar Property (5%) and the State of Qatar (95%).[9] The Shard is managed by Real Estate Management (UK) Limited on behalf of the owners.
A digitally added version of the Shard can be seen in the 2006 movie Children Of Men. At the beginning of this movie, as the main character, Theo leaves a coffee shop, a tall pointed building can be seen in the background. As the Shards construction only began in 2009, three years after the movie was filmed. The movie took place in 2027, sixteen years after The Shard was due to be completed. In December 2011, a group of recreational trespassers calling themselves the Place Hackers evaded security and made their way to the top of the Shard building site, climbing one of the tallest cranes in the process.[87] They later posted photographs of the London skyline taken from the top of the Shard on the Internet and received wide media attention. One member of the group, Oxford University researcher Bradley Garrett, later revealed to various news outlets that over 20 urban explorers had made their way to the top of the building during its construction.[88] In a 2012 article for Domus magazine, Garrett wrote that “the conceptual barrier to places in our cities is brought about by a process of engineered exclusion” and that the explorers were “cultivating the creative city that money can’t buy”.[89] BASE jumpers reportedly jumped from The Shard more than a dozen times between 2009 and 2012. Four jumps were reportedly made by Essex roofer Dan Witchalls, who had filmed one attempt with a helmet-mounted camera. The highest jump was said to have been from a height of 260 metres (850 ft).[90] In March 2016 another person BASE jumped from The Shard.[91]
Laundry Business
March 7 2014
On Monday, a British civil servant was photographed arriving in Downing Street for a national security council meeting with an open document in his hand. We could read for ourselves lines from a confidential report on how Prime Minister David Cameron’s government should respond to the Crimea crisis. It recommended that Britain should “not support, for now, trade sanctions,” nor should it “close London’s financial center to Russians.” Any moralizing remnant of the British Empire is gone; it has turned back to the pirate England of Sir Walter Raleigh. Britain’s ruling class has decayed to the point where its first priority is protecting its cut of Russian money — even as Russian armored personnel carriers rumble around the streets of Sevastopol. But the establishment understands that, in the 21st century, what matters are banks, not tanks.
The Russians also understand this. They know that London is a center of Russian corruption, that their loot plunges into Britain’s empire of tax havens — from Gibraltar to Jersey, from the Cayman Islands to the British Virgin Islands — on which the sun never sets. British residency is up for sale. “Investor visas” can be purchased, starting at £1 million ($1.6 million). London lawyers in the Commercial Court now get 60 percent of their work from Russian and Eastern European clients. More than 50 Russia-based companies swell the trade at London’s Stock Exchange. The planning regulations have been scrapped, and along the Thames, up go spires of steel and glass for the hedge-funding class. Britain’s bright young things now become consultants, art dealers, private banker and hedge funders. Or, to put it another way, the oligarchs’ valets.
The Shard — the Qatari-owned, 72-floor skyscraper above the grotty Southwark riverside — is a symbol of that change. The Shard encapsulates the new hierarchy of the city. On the top floors, “ultra high net worth individuals” entertain escorts in luxury apartments. By day, on floors below, investment bankers trade incomprehensible derivatives. Come nightfall, the elevators are full of African cleaners, paid next to nothing and treated as nonexistent. The acres of glass windows are scrubbed by Polish laborers, who sleep four to a room in bedsit slums. And near the Shard are the immigrants from Lithuania and Romania, who broke their backs on construction sites, but are now destitute and whiling away their hours along the banks of the Thames. The Shard is London, a symbol of a city where oligarchs are celebrated and migrants are exploited but that pretends to be a multicultural utopia. Here, in their capital city, the English are no longer calling the shots. They are hirelings.
An Elephant Sitting Still (Chinese: 大象席地而坐, “Dà Xiàng Xídì Érzuò“) is a 2018 Chinese film written, directed and edited by Hu Bo. The first and last film of the novelist-turned-director Hu, who committed suicide soon after finishing his film on 12 October 2017 at the age of 29, it is based on a story with the same title from his 2017 novel Huge Crack.[2][3] It made its world premiere in the Forum section of the 68th Berlin International Film Festival.[4][5][6] The film had won acclaim from other established directors such as Bela Tarr, Wang Bing, Ang Lee and Gus Van Sant.[7]
In the northern Chinese city of Manzhouli, it is said that there is an elephant that simply sits still and ignores the world. Manzhouli becomes an obsession for the protagonists of the film, a longed-for escape from the downward spiral in which they find themselves (the film is set in Jingxing County, Hebei province). Among them is schoolboy Wei Bu (Peng Yuchang), on the run after accidentally pushing classmate Yu Shuai, who had been bullying him, down the stairs. Wei Bu’s classmate Huang Ling (Wang Yuwen) has run away from her mother and fallen for the charms of the school’s deputy dean. Yu Shuai’s older brother, Yu Cheng (Zhang Yu), feels responsible for the suicide of a friend after sleeping with his wife. Wang Jin (Liu Congxi) is a sprightly pensioner whose daughter and son-in-law want to offload him onto a nursing home. In virtuoso visual compositions, the film tells the story of one single suspenseful day from dawn to dusk, when the train to Manzhouli is set to depar
Excerpt From: David Foster Wallace. Infinite jest: a novel
The Thai Canal, also known as Kra Canal or Kra Isthmus Canal, refers to proposals for a canal that would connect the Gulf of Thailand with the Andaman Sea across the Kra Isthmus in southern Thailand. It is envisaged that such a canal would improve transportation in the region, similar to the Panama Canal and Suez Canal. The canal would provide an alternative to transit through the Straits of Malacca and shorten transit for shipments of oil to Japan and China by 1,200 km.[1] China refers to it as part of its 21st century maritime Silk Road. Proposals for the canal in 2015 measure 102 kilometres long, 400 meters wide and 25 meters deep. Plans for a canal have been discussed and explored at various times, but have not been implemented.[2] Cost and environmental concerns have been weighed against the potential economic and strategic benefits. In February 2018, Thailand’s Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha declared that the canal was not a government priority.[3] But, on 16 January 2020, the Thai House of Representatives agreed to set up a committee within 120 days to study the Thai Canal project.[2]
The idea of a Kra Canal has been proposed in modern times since the 1930s, but has never materialized due to high cost and environmental repercussions.[9] The Strait of Malacca, just under 1,000 kilometres (620 mi) long, is narrow, less than 2.5 kilometres (1.6 mi) at the narrowest, and just 25 metres (82 ft) deep at its shallowest point. It is used by many oil tankers, bulk carriers and container ships. It is estimated that some 80% of Japan’s and South Korea’s oil and natural gas supplies pass through it. The strait, the world’s busiest shipping route, saw a record 84,000 vessels sail through it in 2016.[10] Its yearly capacity is 120,000 vessels. The Maritime Institute of Malaysia forecasts that by 2025, about 140,000 vessels and freighters will seek to transit the strait. A canal would reduce shipping times between the South China Sea and the Andaman Sea two or three days and reduce distance travelled by at least 1,200 kilometres compared with the strait.[10] Bunker fuel savings for a 100,000 dwt (deadweight) oil tanker could be as much as US$350,000 per trip.[11] In early-2015, calls for yet another feasibility study of the canal were put forward, a leading proponent being the Thai-Chinese Culture and Economic Association of Thailand (TCCEAT). Supporters of the canal believe that it would end Thailand’s economic slump and make it a “global shipping and economic hub, rivalling the Panama Canal”.[12] On 15 May 2015, a memorandum of understanding was signed by the China-Thailand Kra Infrastructure Investment and Development company / 中泰克拉基础设施投资开发有限公司 in Guangzhou to advance the project.[13][14] On 19 May 2015 the Thai government denied reports that an agreement had been signed with China to construct the canal. The canal would take an estimated ten years to complete at a cost of US$28 billion In 2005, an internal report prepared for U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was leaked to The Washington Times, spelling out China’s strategy of underwriting construction of the canal across the Kra Isthmus, with Chinese port facilities and refineries, as part of its “string of pearls” strategy of forward bases and energy security.[15] The Chinese plan called for construction over ten years employing roughly 30,000 workers at a cost of between US$20–25 billion.[16] THE KRA CANAL AND THAI SECURITY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=523kTqtyhug
The Nicaraguan Canal (Spanish: Canal de Nicaragua), formally the Nicaraguan Canal and Development Project (also referred to as the Nicaragua Grand Canal, or the Grand Interoceanic Canal) was a proposed shipping route through Nicaragua to connect the Caribbean Sea (and therefore the Atlantic Ocean) with the Pacific Ocean. Scientists were concerned about the project’s environmental impact, as Lake Nicaragua is Central America’s key freshwater reservoir[4] while the project’s viability was questioned by shipping experts and engineers.[5] Construction of a canal using the San Juan River as an access route to Lake Nicaragua was first proposed in the early colonial era. The United States abandoned plans to construct a waterway in Nicaragua in the early 20th century after it purchased the French interests in the Panama Canal. In June 2013, Nicaragua’s National Assembly approved a bill to grant a 50-year concession to finance and manage the project to the private HK Nicaragua Canal Development Investment (HKND) headed by Wang Jing, a Chinese billionaire.[6][7][8][9][10][11] The concession could have been extended for another 50 years once the waterway was operational.[12] In 2015, media reports suggested the project would be delayed and possibly cancelled because Wang’s personal wealth declined greatly as a result of the 2015–16 Chinese stock market crash.[5][13] “Major works” such as dredging were to take place after the finishing of a Pacific Ocean wharf, whose construction was planned to start in late 2016.[5] The Nicaraguan government failed to present reliable information about whether or not the project can be financed, thus casting doubt over whether it would be completed.[14][15][16][17] The HKND Group stated that financing would come from debt and equity sales and a potential initial public offering (IPO).[5] By May 2017, no concrete action had been reportedly taken constructing the canal and further doubts were expressed about its financing.[18] In February 2018, analysts widely viewed the project as defunct,[1][3][19] though the head of the project insisted work was on-going[1] and HKND retained the legal rights to the concession for the canal as well as side projects.[20] Despite HKND vanishing, the Nicaraguan government indicates that it will go ahead with the 908 km2 dry land expropriations anywhere within Nicaragua, under land expropriation Canal Law 840.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_interoceanic_canals
On Optical Inertia
A landscape has no fixed meaning, no privileged vantage point. It is oriented only by the itinerary of the passerby.
The Annihilation of Inertia: Dostoevsky and Metaphysics (Liza Knapp, 2016)
Page 2
In the meditation on eternal life written on his wife’s death, Dostoevsky touches on the main metaphysical concerns he embodies in his fictional works.8 Foremost among these is the struggle to annihilate inertia and achieve eternal life. Dostoevsky’s fictional universe is beset by inertia and other physical laws. While some heroes struggle by various means to annihilate this mechanical force, others submit to it. Dostoevsky uses a hero’s response to this mechanical principle to reveal the hero’s stance on the ultimate questions of human existence, those he himself pondered at the time of his wife’s death.
Dostoevsky’s early training as an engineer in a sense prepared him for this metaphysical dimension to his thinking by acquainting him with the principles of physics whose implications he later explored in his works. At the Academy of Military Engineers, where he began studies in 1838, Dostoevsky took at least one course in physics.9 He gave up the military and engineering in 1844, but his interest in science outlived this short career. On 27 March 1854, Dostoevsky, in exile for political activity that nearly led to his execution, asked his brother to send him books, imploring him to “understand how necessaiy this spiritual food” was.
Page 3
Inertia, the mechanical principle whose “annihilation,” Dostoevsky thought, would result in eternal life, figured prominently in the physics and philosophy of his time. Isaac Newton had posited inertia as an innate property of all physical matter in the first law of motion of his Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica [Mathematical principles of natural philosophy] of 1687. In part as a consequence of the efforts of Peter the Great (who might even have met Newton in London) to import Western science into Russia, Newtons doctrines quickly became known in Russia and were to play an important role in the new Saint Petersburg Academy of Sciences.
Page 4
When Newton referred to the force of inertia (or vis e), he meant the innate resistance to change exhibited by all physical bodies, whether in rest or in a state of uniform motion. In Dostoevsky’s works, the concept figures as kosnost’, as inertsiia, or more covertly as an unnamed mechanical force that makes the natural world appear as a machine.
Definitions of this physical principle are often couched in negative terms, portraying inertia as an inability to change. The physics textbook Dostoevsky asked his brother to send him defines inertia in such terms: “Any body which is at rest cannot begin to move on its own. Any body which is in motion cannot change its state of motion on its own.”20 Subsequently I. Fan-der-Flit, characterizing inertia in the Brockhaus-Efron Encyclopedia, wrote: “The attribute of inertia is a strictly negative attribute; it is the absolute inability of bodies to change their motion.”21 Definitions of this sort make inertia appear as a defect or vice, whereas Newton originally formulated the principle in positive terms: “Every body continues [perseveres] in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a right line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed upon it.”22
Page 19
Dostoevsky’s confessional heroes, like Augustine and Rousseau, dis cover inertia within themselves. Inertia causes them to resist change, it prevents new acts, it chains them to past habits, and it sometimes even makes action of any sort impossible. Like Augustine, they recognize the pernicious effects of inertia as well as the threat it poses to free will. Unlike Rousseau, they do not approve of inertia just because it is “natural.” Yet Dostoevsky’s confessional heroes, the underground man, and the husband in “The Meek One,” fail to overcome the inertia and mechanical forces in their lives. Consequently their confessions end without resolution, leaving their heroes more frustrated than before. Their vision of inertia naturally becomes more tragic than that of Augustine (who disarmed the threat of inertia) and that of Rousseau (who discounted the threat to begin with).
Page 22
The underground man has grown so used to his will being inoperative that he has given up trying to change. He explains that this resistance to change comes about with the realization that you will certainly never become another person and that even if in fact there were still time and faith left to change yourself into something else, as like as not, you yourself would not want to change; and if you should have the desire to do so, why even then you wouldn’t do anything because, as it turns out, there is, it seems, nothing to change yourself into. And the essential thing and the end result is that all this occurs as a result of the normal and fundamental laws of hyperdeveloped consciousness and as a result of the inertia directly resulting from these laws and, consequently, not only do you not change but, what’s more, you simply don’t do anything at all. (5:102)
He has surrendered to his inertia; he uses this inertia and “the normal and fundamental laws of hyper-developed consciousness” as an excuse for doing nothing.
Inertia explains why the underground man has not been able to “be come” anything: “Not only could I not become evil, I could not even manage to become anything; not evil, not good, not a scoundrel, not an honest man, not a hero and not an insect” (5:100). In not being able to become anything, the underground man resembles Rousseau, who maintained that he was kept in a state of mediocrity, “far from great virtues and even further from great vices “ by his natural tendency to inertness.
Page 23
The underground man declares that his inertia results, at least partly, from the abnormal conditions in which he lives. In particular, he blames the hypertrophy of his consciousness (of which inertia is the “fruit”) on the Petersburg environment: “I swear to you, ladies and gentlemen, being too conscious is a disease, a true, honest-to-goodness disease. For human use, ordinary human consciousness would be more than enough, that is, half or a fourth of that portion which falls to the lot of the sophisticated man of our miserable nineteenth century, who, moreover, has the double-barreled misfortune of residing in Petersburg, the most abstract and contrived city on the whole face ofthe earth” (5:101).
Page 24
The underground mans defense of free will is full of irony, however, since it comes from someone who admits that his life is determined by the “normal and fundamental laws of hyperdeveloped consciousness” and “the inertia directly resulting from these laws” (5:102). Although the underground man presents the natural man as his “antithesis,” they are alike in that both the underground man and the men of action submit to determinism. (In this sense, Dostoevsky clearly does not present the underground man as a viable and/or desirable alternative to the man of action. His point is that both are ultimately materialists, who bow to scientific law.) The “laws of hyperdeveloped consciousness” are at least as tyrannical as, and, as the underground mans confession reveals, a form of, the laws of nature.
The mechanical principles ruling the lives of the natural, active men might initially appear to differ greatly from the “conscious inertia” of the underground, which means “sitting with arms at rest” and not moving at all. But the men of action blindly continue in uniform motion over which they have no control. In this manner, both types of existence discussed in the underground man’s confession—his own conscious stasis and the men of action’s mindless motion—are actually determined by the same law, which in Newton’s formulation embraces the blind continuance of both motion and rest or the inability to change either of these states.25 In Notes from the Underground, both the underground man and the men of action have lost the capacity for freely willed, self-generated, and self-directed motion. They have no vital force.
Inertia is the Strongest Force in International Relations (Peter Henne, 2018-11-05)
Details continue to trickle out about the horrific assassination of Saudi dissident and writer Jamal Khashoggi. This has captured the attention of foreign policy experts, who have questioned the alliance’s importance and suggested ways to punish Saudi Arabia. Concern about this incidents has spread beyond experts, however. My students and I have frequently debated what will happen to the US-Saudi alliance. And I recently appeared on WCAX in Burlington to discuss what comes next. To both audiences–and in contrast to some commentators–I gave the unsatisfying answer of “not much.” Time after time on the issues I follow dramatic transformations seem about to occur, only to fade as the world moves on. As a result, I’m increasingly convinced that inertia drives international relations.
Let’s just look at what has happened since Khashoggi’s murder. There was the possibility of sanctions against Saudi officials, businesses pulling out, or even an end to US support for the Saudi war in Yemen. A few things did happen. The United States withdrew the visas of a few Saudi officials. Criticism of the war in Yemen grew, and Congress invoked the Magnitsky Act. But that’s about it. Trump can easily avoid acting on the Magnitsy Act and a GOP-held Congress will do little to push him on it. Calls for further investigation into the US role in Yemen haven’t progressed to action. Businesses have quietly kept working with the Saudis. And the visa revocation was mostly symbolic.
Some may say US inaction is due to Trump’s inflated obsession with Saudi arms deals, or the Trump Administration’s reliance on Saudi Arabia to combat Iran. But I think it’s more than that. This sort of thing—dramatic event, possible widespread ramifications, and then…nothing—happens a lot. I’d argue that this is a sign of the power of inertia in international relations: things tend to stay in the state they are, whether in motion or at rest.
In my Middle East politics classes, we discuss current (or relatively current events) and students frequently ask whether some current event will be “the big one” that changes everything. And I keep disappointing them. Just a few examples:
Paul Virilo – Polar Inertia
When a young media figure was recently asked what really filled him with dread, he replied: ‘The idea that everything might become static, that the machine might grind to a halt. That’s why I never take more than ten days’ holiday. I’m terrified of immobility.’ This fore- boding, worthy of a driver afraid of running out of petrol, reveals the hypertension of people living today. Everybody can easily imagine the standstill that will certainly affect them one day or another, not only the sclerosis due to old age and loss of reflexes, but a behav- ioural inertia due to speed and the reduced depth of field of their immediate activities.
Moral Inertia
“We witness horrific things happening in the world all the time, yet do little to stop them. It sometimes seems as though we are watching a film over whose outcome we have no control, rather than participating in reality. Indeed, we are watching a film, since many of these things appear on the television news. Surely, though, the script is not fixed as it would be in a film it is open-ended. We could influence the characters and the events. Why do we, often, not do so?
I intend the phrase moral inertia in the title of this book to convey primarily the notion of moral inaction. In the science of physics, one meaning of the word inertia is “the tendency of a body at rest to stay at rest.” In common parlance, too, inertia is generally associated with inaction or torpor. By moral inertia I mean the tendency of people to remain morally at rest, or unperturbed, in the face of social evils. Such evils may include cruelty perpetrated on individuals or on whole nations, decisions taken that needlessly cause degradation of the biosphere, forms of communication that massively stifle truth, and so forth.”
There is an optical inertia…. In which we view the world through a static Mercator map….
Necessity to build a new optics… a lyricism which moves and orients through google earth pro … situated testimony but marauding, cross-corroborating news articles…. PDFs… etc.
Vis-a-vis cross-corroborating – you could have timecodes underneath the video….
And show the links to the newspaper articles..etc..
North-south dimensions as significant as east-west dimensions… you need to climb into the worldview in each site.
Black Sea – Caspian dyad
Indian Ocean – Pacific Ocean dyad
Dyads are a big thing in Chinese analysis – how to link up provinces that formerly competed in a trophy chase….
Opened to the optics of dyad analysis through Dariusz Wojcik’s work etc. in dyad analysis of NY-LON
The future as chronoscopic exposure on a film of satellite image….
Time as not successional, time as facilities built with time horizons emanating, oozing from them…. Time emanates from facilities.
Lightness across territory as a Sinoforensics where relations of territory / investment / shift are understoof through the optics of synchronicity rather than causality.
Write as if the world is pregnant.. e.g. Thomas Pynchon…
“a large part of human belief about future events rests on the frequency with which they or similar events have occurred in the past. Indeed, when a customer walks in the door of the restaurant, we believe, based on our past encounters with similar customers, that she probably wants tea. But if she first orders scones, we become even more certain. In fact, we might even suggest it: “I presume you want tea with that?” Bayes’s rule simply lets us attach numbers to this reasoning process. From Table 3.1, we see that the prior probability that the customer wants tea (meaning when she walks in the door, before she orders anything) is two-thirds. But if the customer orders scones, now we have additional information about her that we didn’t have before. ”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belief_perseverance – Belief perseverance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semmelweis_reflex
http://cpcchina.chinadaily.com.cn/2010-10/15/content_13918199.htm
SEEK TRUTH FROM FACTS
I. EMANCIPATING THE MIND IS A VITAL
POLITICAL TASK
When it comes to emancipating our minds, using our heads, seeking truth from facts and uniting as one in looking to the future, the primary task is to emancipate our minds. Only then can we, guided as we should be by Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought, find correct solutions to the emerging as well as inherited problems, fruitfully reform those aspects of the relations of production and of the superstructure that do not correspond with the rapid development of our productive forces, and chart the specific course and formulate the specific policies, methods and measures needed to achieve the four modernizations under our actual conditions.
Only if we emancipate our minds, seek truth from facts, proceed from reality in everything and integrate theory with practice, can we carry out our socialist modernization programme smoothly, and only then can our Party further develop Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought. In this sense, the debate about the criterion for testing truth is really a debate about ideological line, about politics, about the future and the destiny of our Party and nation.
Seeking truth from facts is the basis of the proletarian world outlook as well as the ideological basis of Marxism. Just as in the past we achieved all the victories in our revolution by following this principle, so today we must rely on it in our effort to accomplish the four modernizations. Comrades in every factory, government office, school, shop and production team as well as comrades in Party committees at the central, provincial, prefectural, county and commune levels — all should act on this principle, emancipate their minds and use their heads in thinking questions through and taking action on them.
The more Party members and other people there are who use their heads and think things through, the more our cause will benefit. To make revolution and build socialism we need large numbers of pathbreakers who dare to think, explore new ways and generate new ideas.
http://english.qstheory.cn/selections/201302/t20130227_213716.htm
Belt and Road as a revolution on the cognitive level of all Chinese
There are two foundations of seeking truth from facts: investigation and study
Firstly, investigation and study. Investigation and study embody the values of scientific policy-making. Deng Xiaoping said that one only has the right to speak after he has conducted investigation and study. We must proceed from objective realities in raising issues, summarizing experiences, and working out policies, regardless of whether we are in a meeting, making a proposal, or drafting a document. This is what seeking truth from facts is about. The CPC has always regarded investigation and study as the prerequisite for all policy-making efforts. In his essay “Oppose Book Worship,” Mao Zedong said, “Investigation may be likened to the long months of pregnancy, and solving a problem to the day of birth. To investigate a problem is, indeed, to solve it.” A correct strategy can only come from practical experience, and from investigation and study. Chen Yun said the hardest thing about making a decision is getting the facts straight first. Ninety percent of our time should be devoted to studying the situation, and ten percent to making a decision. Only then will a policy decision be well founded.
U.S. policy is an inversion of this 10% to study 90% to making a decision
See Brian Massumi – ontopower…. Effecting the situation you want to walk into..
https://theconversation.com/profiles/amy-glasmeier-761068
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4e1f/68bac35fc0fe099c4397aed305b18a785d1c.pdf
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDRS/Resources/477365-1327504426766/8389626-1327510418796/Chapter-8.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bureaucratic_inertia
https://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2015/03/16/beijings-problem-with-political-inertia/
https://www.cambridgescholars.com/inertia-of-history
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/543363/pdf
https://faculty.bmcc.cuny.edu/faculty/upload/Ally-NormativeInertia….pdf
WHAT WE ARE SEEING IS THE COLLISION OF TWO SCHOOLS…. THE PREEMPTIVE… US.. 10% DELIBERATION 90% ACTION. vs. THE CHINESE ‘truth from facts’ – 90% DELIBERATION and 10% ACTION
In the wake of an inertial streak… the Martin Luther missile carved open too much optimism…. The double movement…. Social acceleration out accelerating political inertia…. The movemen to return back …
IMPLICIT BIAS .. AS INERTIAL FRAMES…
Individual lives like flies on a beam of firelight.. in Folding Beijing…. Individuals strapped to the shifting body of giant structures…. Borne back ceaselessly into the past…
How does Mark Duggan … glitter across the eyeballs.. I remember at the time I had thought he was shot from the helicopter…
Into the collective inertial retina rooms…. And now his son… the drill rap lyrics…seaside towns dealing drugs at dawn…. Hard hitting lyrics of a life lived…. Outside the frame…. Anachronistic temporal outsiders, carriers of residual difference who literally embody a past time, violate the chronology of present time, and represent a threat to future time, the Future Sound of London, the hum of stock sheets, and real estate purchase and pints poured through AMEX cards on Canary Wharf.
What about a practice of getting up a map of a city … picking a street and house at random then going to that house an interviewing them … their life story.. .their neighbourhood… their depth… the glittering city behind their eyes that you could never know.
WHAT IS THE ROLE OF SYSTEM 2 THINKING IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ?
https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/465165.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Aae3615cacd07f4d65d080f3113f99899
Memory is architectonic: it concerns originally the very ground of all our behaviors: the world. Understood as an evential, memory is not “in us,” in the form of remembrances, but outside of us in the world, since it is the very manner in which the world, as the articulated totality of our possibilities, originally configured by inaugurating events, happens for us, envelops us, and hangs over us. The eventualities in question are not the vestiges of a past buried or disappeared, but the very manner in which the having-taken-place is present for the advenant, like a dimension of the world itself.
NO MEMORY IS NUCLEAR
Memory is the non-empirical undergoing of all that which, in the “past,” has struck, reached, and sometimes wounded us, that is to say,of these possibilities in play in events that drew the very contours of our history and determined the manner in which we ourselves, for ourselves, undergo and understand our singularity. These possibilities are not first “inus,” in a psychological form, but they are addressed to us and befall us from the world as the correlate of all our attitudes: they are present in all that we are present to, and in the significant context conditioning the very presence of all that we can be present to: the world. Only the possible is truly unforgettable. This is why memory does not have to do with facts, but germinates at the heart of events insofar as they, though past, bear the seeds of an irreducible future. A germinal memory of the possible as such,which can be conjugated only in the future perfect tense: what the adve-nant remembers is that which, in the “past,” still has a future for him: the event itself. “Memory,” affirms Peguy, “digs and dives and probes into the event”: it is “central and axial” to the event, and “being in the event, con- sists essentially and above all in not going out from it, in remaining there and in going up into it from within.”
Freedom as a conceptual pinning, freedom to pivot the camera lens…freedom to move inside a milieu …. thickness, weight, balance, a question of space and time,, could Azerbaijan ween itself off of the black gold beneath its belly…
Development is a question of timing … of riding the wavebreak out of the grain silos…
Caspian…missiles launching into the Syrian theatre…
That huge moon, hanging above the Caspian glimpsed from Baku by night.
There’s a moment in Don Delillo’s Underworld when Marian gets in a hot air balloon….
The reds…. The blues…
Blip in a radar…
Colour moves…
Concluding on optical inertia….
If we are smear where ethics?
Speak about the lateralising of the soul….
So we had Freudian depth schematic…. The primordial oceanic soup at the base…. The conscious above…. Lay the three dimensions out thus…. The slow substrata..blue…. The fast spectacle…. Then the mundane grey top layer….
Then maybe shift the narrative to discuss the lateralisation of the soul… Deleuze and Guattari… in a logistical world…. Disorder is not so much a phenomenon of childhood depth than of laterality….
Lay the three dimensions out laterally on the screen…. This tension… explore…
BUT TO SUGGEST COLOURS MOVE… ALSO SUGGEST THEY HOLD TIME….
Bring in Dugin in The Last War of the World-Island…
Note how the space-faring layer… requires conscious thought… an overconscience against death… ‘environmental inversion’. While the natural situation is such that the environment surrounds and humans are surrounded, the construction of the absolute island creates a situation in which humans themselves design and set up the surroundings in which they will later reside. This virtually means: surrounding the surroundings, encompassing the encompassing, carrying the carrying…seize that which seizes us…. Page 308, Sloterdijk.
Saunders en J. van Brakel
Summary: Colour: An Exosomatic Organ?
According to the state of the art in psychology and philosophy, colour sensations are located in a ‘quality space’. This space has three dimensions: hue (the chromatic aspect of colour), saturation (the ‘intensity’ of hue), and brightness. This space is structured further via a small number of primitive hues or landmark colours, usually four (red, yellow, green, blue) or six (if white and black are included). It has also been suggested that there are eleven semantic universals – the six colours previously mentioned plus orange, pink, brown, purple, and grey. Against the standard view, we argue that colour might better be regarded as the outcome of a social-historical developmental trajectory in which there is mutual shaping of philosophical presuppositions, scientific theories, experimental practices, technological tools, rhetorical frameworks, and their intercalated and recursive interactions with the lifeworld. That is: the domain of colour (the three-dimensional quality space) is the outcome of interactive processes of scientific, instrumental, industrial, and everyday lifeworlds.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v19/n20/john-kerrigan/when-eyesight-is-fully-industrialised
Speed destroys colour,’ wrote Paul Morand in 1937: ‘when a gyroscope is spinning fast everything goes grey.’
But then Virilio writes of the sea…. Opening….
The discovery of the of the sea is a precious experience that bears thought. Seeing the oceanic horizon is indeed anything but a secondary experience; it is in fact an event in consciousness of underestimated consequences.
I have forgotten none of the sequences of this finding in the course of a summer when recovering peace and access to the beach were one and the same event. With the barriers removed, you were henceforth free to explore the liquid continent; the occupants had returned to their native hinterland
The clearest feeling was still one of absence; the immense beach of La Baule was deserted, there were less than a dozen of us on the loop of blond sand, not a vehicle was to be seen on the streets; this had been a frontier that an army had just abandoned, and the meaning of this oceanic immensity was intertwined with this aspect of the deserted battlefield.
But let us get back to the sequences of my vision. The rail car I was on, and in which I had been imagining the sea, was moving slowly through the Brière plains. The weather was superb and the sky over the low ground was starting, minute by minute, to shine. This well-known brilliance of the atmosphere approaching the great reflector was totally new; the transparency I was so sensitive to was greater as the ocean got closer, up to that precise moment when a line as even as a brushstroke crossed the horizon : an almost glaucous gray-green line, but one that was extending out to the limits of the horizon. It’s color was disappointing, compared to the sky’s luminescence, but the expanse of the oceanic horizon was truly surprising: could such a vast space be void of the slightest clutter? Here was the real surprise: in length, breadth, and depth the oceanic landscape had been wiped clean. Even the sky was as divided up by clouds, but the sea seemed empty in contrast. From such a distance there was no way of determining anything like foam movement. My loss of bearings was proof that I had entered a new element; the sea had become a desert, and the August heat made that all the more evident – this was a white-hot space in which sun and ocean had become a magnifying glass scorching away every relief and contrast. Trees, pines, etched-out dark spots; the square in front of the station was at once white and void – that particular emptiness you feel in recently abandoned places. It was high noon, and the luminous verticality and liquid horizontality composed a surprising climate.
Advancing in the midst of houses with gaping windows, I was anxious to set foot on my first beach.
The discovery of the of the sea is a precious experience that bears thought. Seeing the oceanic horizon is indeed anything but a secondary experience; it is in fact an event in consciousness of underestimated consequences.
As I approached Ocean Boulevard, the water level began to rise between the pines and the villas; the ocean was getting larger, taking up more and more space in my angle of vision. Finally, while crossing the avenue parallel to the shore, the earth line seemed to have plunged into the undertow, leaving everything smooth, no waves and little noise. Yet another element was here before me: the hydrosphere.
When calling to mind the reasons that made the bunkers so appealing to me almost twenty years ago, I see it clearly now as a case of intuition and also as a convergence between the reality of the structure and the fact of its implantation alongside the ocean: a convergence between my awareness of spatial phenomena – the strong pull of the shores – and their being the locus of the works of the “Atlantic Wall” (Atlantikwall) facing the open sea, facing out into the void. (Bunker Archaeology, Paul Virilio, 1975)
As light from distant stars is deflected by an imposing mass, favouring the illusion of gravitational optics, our perception of depth might well be a kind of visual plunge, comparable to the fall of bodies in the law of universal gravitation. If so, the perspective of the real space of the Quattrocentro would have been early scientific evidence of this. In fact, from the moment in history, optics becomes kinematic. Galileo was to supply proof of this in the face of all opposition. With the Renaissance perspectivists, we ‘fall’ into the volume of the visible spectacle as though by the force of gravity; literally the world opens up before us. Much later, physiologists will discover that the faster you move from one place to another, the further ahead your eyes adapt. From then on, the old ‘vanishing lines vertigo’ is coupled with the projection involved in focusing one’s eyes. To illustrate this sudden magnification of vision as a result of an increase in speed, here is the tale of a parachutists, a free fall specialist:
‘Eyeballing consists in visually assessing the distance between you and the ground the whole time you are falling. You evaluate your height and work out the exact moment you need to open your parachute based on a dynamic visual impression. When you are flying in a plane at an altitude of 600 metres, you don’t have anything like the visual impression you have when you clear this altitude in a high-speed vertical fall. When you are at 2,000 metres, you can’t see the ground approaching. But when you reach the 800 to 600 metre mark, you start to see it ‘coming’. The sensation becomes scary pretty quickly because of ground rush, the ground rushing up at you. The apparent diameter of objects increases faster and faster and you suddenly have the feeling you are not seeing them getting closer but seeing them move apart suddenly, as though the ground were splitting open.
This account is invaluable as it illustrates in a truly gravitational way the dizziness induced by perspective, its apparent weightiness. To this ‘eyeballer’, perspective geometry appears for what it has never ceased to be: a headlong rush of perception in which the very rapidity of free fall reveals the fractal nature of vision that results from high-speed eye adaptation. In this experience, at a certain distance, at a certain moment, the ground no longer approaches, but parts and splits open, going suddenly from a ‘whole’ dimension with no receding lines, to a ‘fractional’ dimension in which the visible spectacle gapes open. The horizon of visibility of the ‘faller’ prior to being smashed to smithereens depends essentially on the speed at which his eyes adapt, focusing and an imperceptible time freeze depending on the mass of his body itself. The path’s being defines the subject’s perception through the object’s mass. The falling body suddenly becomes the body of the fall. (Open Sky, Paul Virilio, 1997).
Optical Unconscious
Optical inertia….
How does sense of time / sense of space change during war…. Do the pupils dilate in the glint of falling bombs…
Three dimensions of the soul….
River Elegy. Maybe return to the motif.. of the blue to left…. River elegy on the right…
Freedom as a conceptual pinning, freedom to pivot the camera lens…freedom to move inside a milieu …. thickness, weight, balance, a question of space and time,, could Azerbaijan ween itself off of the black gold beneath its belly…
Development is a question of timing … of riding the wavebreak out of the grain silos…
Caspian…missiles launching into the Syrian theatre… That huge moon hanging above the Caspian glimpsed from Baku by night
The Launderer, Laundering, washes his conscience over in the tumble dryer, cleans out, remedial blue
Capturing the pulse of parallel lines, parallax lines converging in the Incident of COVID-19
Background Image : 06:25 April 20 2020 Shard East Solar
Dominion from Sea to Sea: Pacific Ascendancy and American Power (Bruce Cumings, 2009)
This book develops a Pacific perspective on America’s relationship to the world, standing in James Polk’s Washington a century and a half ago and coming down to the present, drawing a fairly straight line all the way from the origin and development of California and the West ultimately to the heartland of the People’s Republic of China. If Walt Whitman and historian Richard Drinnon had not thought of it first, “facing West” would be the title of this book. In other words, this is not a book about the West or about American involvement in the Pacific. It is about both, as a way of erasing the line between domestic and international perspectives. In exploring the contemporary American ascendancy, I attempt to join together what other authors usually treat separately: domestic and international history, international relations and political economy, and both sides of a vigorous Pacific economy. This book is also about technological change, and how sharp leaps forward in economic growth created a bicoastal national economy that has led the world for more than a century, a development that also transformed, undercut, or simply crushed original American conceptions of the continent they first inhabited nearly 400 years ago: a garden, an Eden, Arcadia, someday a Utopia.
Most of the American literature on international affairs remains deeply imbued with Atlanticism, but I will argue for a dual posture: an Atlanticist dimension in our relations with Europe and a Pacific dimension that began with the frontier and mid-nineteenth-century relations with East Asia, but which in the past half-century has come to rival and perhaps surpass our Atlantic relations, giving us a new way to make sense of the American position in the world. The global leader that the United States replaced had the same curiosity as the one that was going to hold sway in the current century: Great Britain and Japan both occupy small islands, set just far enough away from the mainland to breed a solipsistic sense of ineffable superiority (indeed, for the British, “continentalism” connotes European provincialism). Once the United States was also called an “island country,” sheltered by two great oceans. It was the only great power that for more than a century was entirely self-sufficient unto itself and therefore invulnerable to external dependencies, and the only power with vast reaches yet to be filled up with people and enterprise (save for Russia’s frigid and still-undeveloped frontier in Siberia, or the deserts and mountains of China’s Central Asian steppe, still home to tribes and nomads). The American position in the world, however, owes much to its being the first hegemonic power to inhabit an immense land mass: not an island empire like England or Pacific Century-pretender Japan, but a continent open at both ends to the world’s two largest oceans. The United States is the only great power with long Atlantic and Pacific coasts, making it simultaneously an Atlantic and a Pacific nation. The historic dominance of Atlanticists, gazing upon a Europe whose civilization gave birth to our own, averts our eyes from this fact (indeed, the continental divide still makes a New Yorker uncomfortable in Los Angeles-and vice versa).
I want to put forth a “Pacificist” interpretation of America’s role and position in the world, or for short, a non-Atlanticist text. But “Pacificist” sounds too much like “pacifist” (and is a synonym for it according to the Oxford English Dictionary), which is hardly my intent, nor is it to critique or supplant Atlanticism. That is a venerable narrative, kept alive in our time by people like Henry Kissinger, for the world, and the late Samuel Huntington (WhoAre We?), for the ethnic core that shaped it: Anglo-Saxons. It would be boorish to point out that most Atlanticists seem to know very little about our Pacific involvements, or East Asia itself; Kissinger’s multivolume tome is the best memoir of a secretary of state since Dean Acheson’s Present at the Creation, but when it comes to trying to understand Japan or China, one is a kabuki play and the other is boxes-within-boxes. My main themes are these, recurring throughout the analysis: (r) the American singularity of a thickly settled and still dynamic Atlantic Coast and Middle Border (the Midwest, as it was long called), and an even more vibrant Pacific Coast that keeps reinventing itself; (2) the expansion of settlers through a continent perceived as empty and unspoiled, a limitless garden-or Eden, or Arcadia-requiring only white settler fertilization to bloom into Utopia, and the absence in the same narrative of any means of comprehending the relentless industrialization that began to transform this garden nearly two centuries ago and has never quit; (3) the white settler encounter with people of color, which was and remains fundamentally different from American interaction with Europeans; (4) American relations with East Asia which, beginning more than i5o years ago with Perry’s “opening” ofJapan on the heels of Polk’s war with Mexico, have never conformed to the Atlanticist narrative and in fact depart dramatically from it; (5) the tipping point that 1941 signified in our interactions with East Asia and the rest of the world, which ultimately became more important and determining than our historical relations with Europe-since Pearl Harbor the United States has operated differently in the Pacific compared to the Atlantic, and this increasingly seems to be the way we operate globally-leading to the deepest divisions with our traditional Atlantic allies since the victory in 1945; (6) the role of the central state in developing the West and especially California; (7) the global archipelago of military bases that arose during the Korean War and the cold war and that has its strongest impact in the Pacific; and (8) a state-funded digital revolution in the past half-century that is a core element of American preeminence.
The Pacific is the world’s largest ocean, indeed it is the planet’s “biggest single feature,” in Colin McEvedy’s words; twice the size of the Atlantic, it occupies about one-third of the earth’s surface. It also has more islands than any other ocean, about 25,ooo. Few books with Pacific in the title fail to dwell on the islands-and their romance, exoticism, and freewheeling ways (think of Michener’s South Pacc). This book isn’t about that vast ocean or that romance. The equator marks off the southern boundary of my interest. It isn’t that the southern region is unimportant: it’s that American interactions with East Asia are much more important. They began with China, Hawaii, Japan, and Korea, then a war with Spain over the Philippines, then the Pacific War; since Pearl Harbor we have fought three major wars in East Asia (one win, one draw, one loss)-and since roughly the same time, the opposite shores of the northern Pacific have had world-historical industrial booms. The Pacific West has been an engine of growth for more than i5o years. The gold rush touched off the Americanization and multiethnic peopling of California, and industrial agriculture, citrus, the discovery of oil, movies, and real estate booms followed on its heels. The Roaring Twenties was not just an era of flappers and the Charleston, but years of pioneering innovation when Californians first sampled the seductive possibilities of mass consumption and mass culture that the rest of the world now absorbs as part of its lifestyle: automobiles, suburbs, radios, Hollywood films, professional sports, “consumer durables” like refrigerators. And a sharp-eyed Willa Cather noticed: “The whole world broke apart in 1922 or thereabouts”; America “had got ahead wonderfully, but somehow ahead on the wrong road,” she thought. At that time American industry perfected both mass production and the means to digest the same goods-en masse. The 192os capped an amazingly quick American rise to world preeminence: the United States had 29 percent of global industrial production in the i88os, 36 percent by 1913 (compared to Britain’s 14 percent), and 42 percent in 1929-the highest percentage ever, save for the abnormal period just after World War II when all the advanced industrial economies had suffered extensive war damage, except for the unscathed United States (which temporarily held half of all global production). Southern California occupied the horizon of 192os-style mass consumption, a new form of pioneering that defined the third industrial revolution (autos, assembly line mass production often called Fordism).1
The successive administrations of Franklin D. Roosevelt provided the turning point from continental isolation to global involvement. When he was “Mr. New Deal,” an open spigot of federal spending brought the direct involvement of the national government into the extensive development of the Far West, and especially water and power; the New Deal built massive infrastructures (like the Grand Coulee Dam) and managed and developed western farmlands and the immense water works necessary to till them. When Roosevelt was “Mr. Win-the-War,” under emergency conditions federal administrators authorized and subsidized hundreds of new war-related industries in Southern California, the Bay Area, Portland, and Seattle, thus accomplishing the industrialization of the Pacific West while the gross national product doubled in five years. The emergence of Los Angeles as a major industrial city in the space of one decade (1940-50) symbolized this continental “market completion,” and another huge shot in the arm came via the Korean crisis and permanent cold war defense spending at historically unprecedented levels. The stage was thus set for the American political economy to grow in tandem with both Atlantic and Pacific interests and involvements.
Defense firms like Lockheed failed several times before the war but flourished thereafter, all through the cold war and until its end, when defense contracts began drying up. (In 1996 Disney spent $45 million to turn Lockheed’s Stealth aircraft design facility, long known as “the Skunk Works,” into an animation studio.)2 Just as this happened, however, new information-age industries drove America’s Pacific economy out of recession and into the longest peacetime boom in American history. Boeing teamed with Microsoft to transform Seattle from a backwater to a major Pacific Rim city in the space of one decade (roughly 1980-90), Intel and Nike brought Portland out of the 197os-8os doldrums of an old economy based on resource exports (mainly timber), and California recaptured its leading-edge position in the national economy as Silicon Valley made northern California richer even than Southern California. I will argue that the core of California’s incessant industrial innovation resides in a peculiar combination of youthful initiative and fulsome state funding, a phenomenon that goes back to the Depression and World War II, and trades on California’s salutary distance from the dominant institutions of the East. Other parts of the American West will interest us: Texas, an anomalous aspect of the story, is nonetheless part of it. Like the Pacific Coast states, it also fronts on an ocean, but the other western states do not and thus belong to a different narrative. This book asserts that the United States cannot be understood without knowing the West; that in the past i5o years the country has been shaped more dramatically by the West and American Pacific involvements than by any other region; that one state-California-is a more dramatic shaper of national destiny than any other; and that America’s position in the world, the ultimate whole we are trying to understand, is inexplicable without grasping the intertwined power of the coastal states and U.S. dominance across the expansive oceans on which they gaze.
I think this is a story of the past and the present, but many will think it is prophecy-a claim on the future. It doesn’t matter, really; paradoxically, the old and timeworn traditions of western history return to us today with a new freshness, as the search for India or a northwest passage to the Orient or Berkeley’s westward march of empire or America as the “middle country” linking Asia and Europe acquire a true depth of meaning with an ascendant Pacific trade, and more importantly with the mingling of diverse peoples and cultures, now so casual and unexceptionable on the West Coast and in much of the country. American destiny is finally and thoroughly intertwined with Mexico, China, Korea, Japan, Vietnam, and again finally, India. The emergence of the United States after 1941 as a simultaneous Atlantic and Pacific power, operating at a cutting-edge technological pace on both coasts and at many places in between (Chicago, Houston, Denver) is the central idea of this book, and I believe it is the essential basis of a global hegemony that has reached no more than early middle age in our time, if that. The central problem of the book is how to understand and explain the difference between an Atlantic-facing internationalism and a Pacific-facing expan sionism, the twin sides of America’s relation to the world. Just in time, as if history relishes an illustrative counterpoint, along came a westerner with the most finely honed example of the expansionist tendency since James Polk, Teddy Roosevelt, or Douglas MacArthur: George W. Bush. But I began working on this book years before he came into office, and I am forced to admit that I thought things were moving in the other direction-toward a new internationalism (called “globalization”) in both Europe and East Asia, which Bill Clinton seemed to understand and forward effortlessly.4 Today it appears that unless extraordinary efforts are made to overcome our historic unilateralism and easy recourse to the use of force in Asia, thus to engage and involve the East Asian countries in a spirit of equality and mutual advantage, this century is going to have prolonged and devastating consequences for world peace.
Depth is not automatic. re: Belt and Road
Orbit yourself in
Parallax here is an entire
series of theThere is an entire series of the modes of parallax in different domains of modern theory: quantum physics (the wave-particle duality); the parallax of neurobiology (the realization that, when we look behind the face into the skull, we find nothing; “there’s no one at home” there, just piles of gray matter—it is difficult to tarry with this gap between meaning and the pure Real); the parallax of ontological difference, of the discord between the ontic and the transcendental-ontological (we cannot reduce the ontological hori- zon to its ontic “roots,” but neither can we deduce the ontic domain from the onto- logical horizon; that is to say, transcendental constitution is not creation); the parallax of the Real (the Lacanian Real has no positive-substantial consistency, it is just the gap between the multitude of perspectives on it); the parallax nature of the gap between desire and drive (let us imagine an individual trying to perform some simple manual task—say, grab an object which repeatedly eludes him: the moment he changes his at- titude, starting to find pleasure in just repeating the failed task, squeezing the object which, again and again, eludes him, he shifts from desire to drive);10 the parallax of the unconscious (the lack of a common measure between the two aspects of Freud’s the- oretical edifice, interpretations of the formations of the unconscious [The Interpretation of Dreams, The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious] and theo- ries of drives [Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, and so on])
Claude Lévi-Strauss’s exemplary analysis, from Structural Anthropology, of the spatial dis- position of buildings in the Winnebago, one of the Great Lakes tribes, might be of some help here.The tribe is divided into two subgroups (“moieties”), “those who are from above” and “those who are from below”; when we ask an individual to draw on a piece of paper, or on sand, the ground-plan of his or her village (the spatial disposi- tion of cottages), we obtain two quite different answers, depending on his or her be- longing to one or the other subgroup. Both perceive the village as a circle; but for one subgroup there is within this circle another circle of central houses, so that we have two concentric circles, while for the other subgroup the circle is split in two by a clear di- viding line. In other words, a member of the first subgroup (let us call it “conservative- corporatist”) perceives the ground-plan of the village as a ring of houses more or less symmetrically disposed around the central temple, whereas a member of the second (“revolutionary-antagonistic”) subgroup perceives his or her village as two distinct heaps of houses separated by an invisible frontier. . . . The point Levi-Strauss wants to make is that this example should in no way entice us into cultural relativism, ac- cording to which the perception of social space depends on the observer’s group- belonging: the very splitting into the two “relative” perceptions implies a hidden reference to a constant—not the objective, “actual” disposition of buildings but a traumatic kernel, a fundamental antagonism the inhabitants of the village were unable to symbolize, to account for, to “internalize,” to come to terms with, an imbalance in social relations that prevented the community from stabilizing itself into a harmonious whole.The two perceptions of the ground-plan are simply two mutually exclusive endeavors to cope with this traumatic antagonism, to heal its wound via the imposition of a balanced symbolic structure. It is here that one can see in what precise sense the Real intervenes through anamorphosis. We have first the “actual,” “objec- tive” arrangement of the houses, then its two different symbolizations which both dis- tort the actual arrangement in an anamorphic way. However, the “Real” here is not the actual arrangement, but the traumatic core of some social antagonism which distorts the tribe members’ view of the actual arrangement of the houses in their village.
This means that, ultimately, the status of the Real is purely parallactic and, as such, non- substantial: is has no substantial density in itself, it is just a gap between two points of perspective, perceptible only in the shift from the one to the other. The parallax Real is thus opposed to the standard (Lacanian) notion of the Real as that which “always returns to its place”—as that which remains the same in all possible (symbolic) uni- verses: the parallax Real is, rather, that which accounts for the very multiplicity of ap- pearances of the same underlying Real—it is not the hard core which persists as the Same, but the hard bone of contention which pulverizes the sameness into the multi- tude of appearances. In a first move, the Real is the impossible hard core which we can- not confront directly, but only through the lenses of a multitude of symbolic fictions, virtual formations. In a second move, this very hard core is purely virtual, actually non- existent, an X which can be reconstructed only retroactively, from the multitude of symbolic formations which are “all that there actually is.”
Take Walter Benjamin’s notion of revolution as redemption-through-repetition of the past:17 apropos of the French Revolution, the task of a true Marxist historiography is not to describe the events as they really were (and to explain how these events gen- erated the ideological illusions that accompanied them); the task is, rather, to unearth the hidden potentialities (the utopian emancipatory potentials) which were betrayed in the actuality of revolution and in its final outcome (the rise of utilitarian market capitalism).The point of Marx is not primarily to make fun of the wild hopes of the Jacobins’ revolutionary enthusiasm, to point out how their high emancipatory rheto- ric was just a means used by the historical “cunning of reason” to establish vulgar commercial capitalist reality; it is to explain how these betrayed radical-emancipatory potentials continue to “insist” as historical specters and to haunt the revolutionary memory, demanding their enactment, so that the later proletarian revolution should also redeem (lay to rest) all these past ghosts. . . .
This parallax split, however, is itself caught up in a parallax: it can be viewed as con- demning us to permanent anxiety, but also as something that is inherently comical.This is why Kierkegaard insisted that there is a comical side to Christianity: is there anything more comical than Incarnation, this ridiculous overlapping of the Highest and the Lowest, the coincidence of God, creator of the universe, and a miserable man?75 Take the elementary comical scene from a film: after the trumpets announce the King’s entrance into the royal hall, the surprised public sees a miserable crippled clown who enters staggering…this is the logic of Incarnation.
The only proper Christian comment on Christ’s death is thus: “La commedia è finita . . .”. And, again, the point is that the gap that separates God from man in Christ is purely one of parallax: Christ is not a per- son with two substances, immortal and mortal. Perhaps this would also be one way of distinguishing between Gnosticism and Christianity: the problem with Gnosticism is that it is all too serious in developing its narrative of ascent toward Wisdom, that it misses the humorous side of religious experience—Gnostics are Christians who miss the joke of Christianity. . . . (And, incidentally, this is why Mel Gibson’s Passion is ultimately an anti-Christian film: it totally lacks this comic aspect.)77
And it is only this that brings us to Mankell’s true achievement: among today’s writers, he is a unique artistoftheparallaxview.Thatistosay,thetwoperspectives—thatoftheaffluentYstadand that of Maputo—are irretrievably “out of sync,” so that there is no neutral language enabling us to translate one into the other, even less to posit one as the “truth” of the other. All we can ultimately do in today’s conditions is to remain faithful to this split as such, to record it. Every exclusive focus on the First World topics of late-capitalist alienation and commodification, of ecological crisis, of the new racisms and intoler- ances, and so on, cannot but appear cynical in the face of raw Third World poverty, hunger, and violence; on the other hand, attempts to dismiss First World problems as trivial in comparison with “real” permanent Third World catastrophes are no less a fake—focusing on the “real problems” of the Third World is the ultimate form of escapism, of avoiding confrontation with the antagonisms of one’s own society. Take Fredric Jameson’s succinct description (from the 1980s) of the deadlock of the dia- logue between the Western New Left and the Eastern European dissidents, the absence of any common language between them:
To put it briefly, the East wishes to talk in terms of power and oppression; the West in terms of culture and commodification.There are really no common denominators in this initial struggle for discursive rules, and what we end up with is the inevitable comedy of each side muttering irrelevant replies in its own favorite language.
In his Being No One,Thomas Metzinger proposes a further brain-sciences variation: Plato was right—with the proviso that there is no one (no observing subject) in the cave.The cave, rather, projects itself (its entire machinery) onto the screen: the theater of shadows works as the self-representation (self-model) of the cave. In other words, the observ- ing subject itself is also a shadow, the result of the mechanism of representation: the “Self” stands for the way a human organism experiences itself, appears to itself, and there is no one behind the veil of self-appearance, no substantial reality:
The illusion is irresistible. Behind every face there is a self. We see the signal of con- sciousness in a gleaming eye and imagine some ethereal space beneath the vault of the skull, lit by shifting patterns of feeling and thought, charged with intention. An essence. But what do we find in that space behind the face, when we look?
The brute fact is there is nothing but material substance: flesh and blood and bone and brain. . . .You look down into an open head, watching the brain pulsate, watching the surgeon tug and probe, and you understand with absolute conviction that there is nothing more to it.There’s no one there.
Is this not the ultimate parallax—this absolute gap between the experience of en- countering somebody and the “nothing behind” of the open skull? It seems that, with this cognitivist naturalization of the human mind, the process described by Freud as the progressive humiliations of man in modern sciences reached its apogee.
When, in his seminar on The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, Lacan claims that the “sovereign Good is das Ding,”this identification of the highest Good with the evil Thing can be properly understood only as involving a parallax shift: the very thing which, viewed from a proper distance, looks like the supreme Good changes into repulsive Evil the moment we come too near it.This is also why it is wrong to oppose the Christian God of Love to the Jewish God of cruel justice: excessive cruelty is the necessary obverse of Christian Love, and, again, the relationship between these two is one of parallax: there is no “substantial” difference between the God of Love and the God of excessive- arbitrary cruelty, lo ’mperador del doloroso regno, it is one and the same God who appears in a different light only due to a parallax shift of our perspective.
My sense of self exists because it gives me an interface with the world. I’m “me” for in- teractions, but my “I” doesn’t substantially exist, in the sense that it can’t be localized anywhere. . . . An emergent property, which is produced by an underlying network, is a coherent condition that allows the system in which it exists to interface at that level— that is, with other selves or identities of the same kind.You can never say, “This property is here; it’s in this component.” In the case of autopoiesis, you can’t say that life—the condition of being self-produced—is in this molecule, or in the DNA, or in the cellu- lar membrane, or in the protein. Life is in the configuration and in the dynamical pat-
Here we encounter the minimum of “idealism” which defines the notion of Self: a Self is precisely an entity without any substantial density, without any hard kernel that would guarantee its consistency. If we penetrate the surface of an organism, and look deeper and deeper into it, we never encounter some central controlling element that would be its Self, secretly pulling the strings of its organs.The consistency of the Self is thus purely virtual; it is as if it were an Inside which appears only when viewed from the Outside, on the interface-screen—the moment we penetrate the interface and en- deavor to grasp the Self “substantially,” as it is “in itself,” it disappears like sand between our fingers.Thus materialist reductionists who claim that “there really is no self” are right, but they nonetheless miss the point. At the level of material reality (inclusive of the psychological reality of “inner experience”), there is in effect no Self: the Self is not the “inner kernel” of an organism, but a surface-effect. A “true” human Self functions, in a sense, like a computer screen: what is “behind” it is nothing but a network of “selfless” neuronal machinery.
Hegel’s thesis that “subject is not a substance” has thus to be taken quite literally: in the opposition between the corporeal-material process and the pure “sterile” appearance, subject is appearance itself, brought to its self- reflection; it is something that exists only insofar as it appears to itself. This is why it is wrong to search behind the appearance for the “true core” of subjectivity: behind it there is, pre- cisely, nothing, just a meaningless natural mechanism with no “depth” to it.
The Biopolitical Parallax
So where are we today? The first insight that suggests itself is that, in contrast to Fas- cism and Stalinism, two “totalitarian” systems preaching the sacrificial mobilization of the entire social body, a kind of permanent state of exception, our late capitalism is characterized by an unprecedented permissiveness.
This is why, in our secular societies of choice, people who maintain a substantial religious belonging are in a subordinate position: even if they are allowed to practice their belief, this belief is “tolerated” as their idiosyncratic personal choice/opinion; the moment they present it publicly as what it is for them (a matter of substantial belonging), they are accused of “fundamentalism.” This means that the “subject of free choice” (in the Western “tolerant” multicultural sense) can emerge only as the result of an extremely violent process of being torn out of one’s particular life-world, being cut off from one’s roots.
The deadlock of “resistance” brings us back to the topic of parallax: all is needed is a slight shift in our perspective, and all the activity of “resistance,” of bombarding those in power with impossible “subversive” (ecological, feminist, antiracist, anti- globalist . . .) demands, looks like an internal process of feeding the machine of power, providing the material to keep it in motion.The logic of this shift should be univer- salized: the split between the public Law and its obscene superego supplement con- fronts us with the very core of the politico-ideological parallax: the public Law and its superego supplement are not two different parts of the legal edifice, they are one and the same “content”—with a slight shift in perspective, the dignified and impersonal Law looks like an obscene machine of jouissance. Another slight shift, and the legal regu- lations prescribing our duties and guaranteeing our rights look like the expression of a ruthless power whose message to us, its subjects, is: “I can do whatever I want with you!” Kafka, of course, was the inimitable master of this parallax shift with regard to the edifice of legal power: “Kafka” is not so much a unique style of writing as a weird innocent new gaze upon the edifice of the Law which practices a parallax shift of perceiving a gigantic machinery of obscene jouissance in what previously looked like a dignified edifice of the legal Order.
the same goes for the ultimate parallax of political economy, the gap between the reality of everyday material social life (people interacting among themselves and with nature, suffering, consuming, and so on) and the Real of the speculative dance of Cap- ital, its self-propelling movement which seems to be disconnected from ordinary re- ality. We can experience this gap very tangibly when we visit a country where life is obviously in a shambles, we see a lot of ecological decay and human misery; the econ- omist’s report we read afterward however, informs us that the country’s economic sit- uation is “financially sane.”. . . Marx’s point here is not primarily to reduce the second dimension to the first (to demonstrate how the supranatural mad dance of com- modities arises out of the antagonisms of “real life”); his point is, rather, that we cannot properly grasp the first (the social reality of material production and social interaction) without the second: it is the self-propelling metaphysical dance of Capital that runs the show, that provides the key to real-life developments and catastrophes.
The deadlock of “resistance” brings us back to the topic of parallax: all is needed is a slight shift in our perspective, and all the activity of “resistance,” of bombarding those in power with impossible “subversive” (ecological, feminist, antiracist, anti- globalist . . .) demands, looks like an internal process of feeding the machine of power, providing the material to keep it in motion.The logic of this shift should be universalized: the split between the public Law and its obscene superego supplement confronts us with the very core of the politico-ideological parallax: the public Law and its superego supplement are not two different parts of the legal edifice, they are one and the same “content”—with a slight shift in perspective, the dignified and impersonal Law looks like an obscene machine of jouissance. Another slight shift, and the legal regu- lations prescribing our duties and guaranteeing our rights look like the expression of a ruthless power whose message to us, its subjects, is: “I can do whatever I want with you!” Kafka, of course, was the inimitable master of this parallax shift with regard to the edifice of legal power: “Kafka” is not so much a unique style of writing as a weird innocent new gaze upon the edifice of the Law which practices a parallax shift of perceiving a gigantic machinery of obscene jouissance in what previously looked like a dignified edifice of the legal Order. https://twitter.com/nickusen/status/1118253255195275265?lang=en – need parallax tweaks in our perception of finance / London / UK not tired pitchfork shouts at tall towers
Recent research has stressed the importance of wartime experience itself, and especially the role of mass military conscription in legitimizing progressive taxation and nearly confiscatory rates on the highest incomes and largest fortunes after the war. After so much working-class blood had been shed, it was impossible not to demand an unprecedented effort on the part of the privileged classes to liquidate the war debt, rebuild the country, and pave the way to a more just society. Some scholars go so far as to conclude that such steeply progressive taxes could not have been implemented without World War I; without a similar (and at this point improbable) experience of mass military conscription in the twenty-first century, it is argued, no such progressive tax will ever again see the light of day. As interesting as these speculations are, they strike me as overly rigid and deterministic. Rather than pretend to be able to identify the causal impact of any particular event, it seems to me more promising to see confluences of crises as endogenous switch points reflecting deeper causes. Each such switch point opens the way to a large number of possible future trajectories. The actual outcome then depends on how actors mobilize and seize on shared experiences and new ideas to change the course of events. World War I was not an exogenous event catapulted to Earth from Mars. It was arguably caused, at least in part, by very serious social inequalities and tensions in pre-1914 European society. Economic issues were also very powerful. […] Furthermore, the central role of World War I in the collapse of ownership society does not mean that we should neglect the importance of other major events of the period, including the Bolshevik Revolution and the Great Depression. These various crises might have unfolded differently and fit together in various ways, and the analysis of numerous countries and their varied trajectories shows that it is difficult to isolate the effects of the war from those of other events […]
To recapitulate: the end of ownership society was due more than anything else to a political-ideological transformation. Reflection and debate around social justice, progressive taxation, and redistribution of income and wealth, already fairly common in the eighteenth century and during the French Revolution, grew in amplitude in most countries in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, owing largely to the very high concentration of wealth generated by industrial capitalism as well as to educational progress and the diffusion of ideas and information. What led to the transformation of the inequality regime was the encounter between this intellectual evolution and a range of military, financial, and political crises, which were themselves due in part to tensions stemming from inequality. Along with political-ideological changes, popular mobilizations and social struggles played a central role, with specificities associated with each country’s particular national history. But there were also common experiences, increasingly widely shared and interconnected throughout the world, which could accelerate the spread of certain practices and transformations. Things will probably be much the same in the future.
Resonance waves from an Event that is Parallactic Nuclear | collision of inertias, shockwave propagation – what political-ideological transformation comes from is seismic, contingent, in the air, like dust